Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Further questions about Touch in Standalone Mode

2010-12-07 Thread garym
I'm mentioned this is all these threads, but I do agree with the "TRY IT" idea. My brother is using the "tiny SbS" with an attached USB drive holding about 50,000 mp3 files (most with embedded artwork) and it works very well. The TOUCH is wifi connected and he also has a BOOM (wifi) that is connec

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Further questions about Touch in Standalone Mode

2010-12-07 Thread Skinny
Well, regarding the usability of the built-in server, "try it!" :D Based on what I've read about people struggling with TinySBS (the built-in version of the server on the Touch), it's generally not very good (yet?). Whatever you do, don't let fuzzing about with the internal server get in your way

Re: [SlimDevices: Touch] Further questions about Touch in Standalone Mode

2010-12-07 Thread Soulkeeper
micsei;593198 Wrote: > Is the fact that the disk should not be filled by more than 80% > confirmed. This is a universal "truth", and not limited to the Touch. No harddisk of any type, in any use, anywhere, should ever be kept at more than 80% full (says Confucius). ;) So I doubt confirmation is n

[SlimDevices: Touch] Further questions about Touch in Standalone Mode

2010-12-06 Thread micsei
Hi Dear Touch users. I am new to this forum and my name is Michel. My Touch should arrive in a few days and I would like to use it in standalone mode with a self-powered 3.5’’ WD Elements 1.5T USB drive. Getting the touch to work well in standalone mode seems tricky. Although I gathered a number o