[Touch-packages] [Bug 1742744] [NEW] machinectl import-tar hangs when the import file is multi-streamed

2018-01-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Public bug reported: When trying to use machinectl import-tar to import a compressed rootfs tarball, if the compression is multi-streamed then the import hangs after the first stream. Either the multi-stream import should work, or it should be detected and an error output. Environment: Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591510] Re: lxc-copy: unrecognized option '--backingstorage'

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release:16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 linux-image-virtual: - Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 +   Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 linux-image-extra-virtual: - Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 +   Installed: 4.4.0.24.25

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591513] Re: lxc-copy: bdev/bdev.c: bdev_copy: 381 no such block device type: overlay

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
After some experimentation I've found that with no 'linux-image-extra- virtual' package installed (whether it's installed or not makes no difference) and all other package versions at the same level the command does work when the backing store is specified as 'overlayfs' instead of 'overlay'.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591510] Re: lxc-copy: unrecognized option '--backingstorage'

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release:16.04 - linux-image-virtual: - Installed: 4.4.0.22.23 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 + linux-image-virtual: + Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 + linux-image-extra-virtual: + Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 Man

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591513] Re: lxc-copy: bdev/bdev.c: bdev_copy: 381 no such block device type: overlay

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release: 16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 linux-image-virtual: - Installed: 4.4.0.22.23 + Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 + linux-image-extra-virtual: + Installed: 4.4.0.24.25 Man ref:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591510] Re: lxc-copy: unrecognized option '--backingstorage'

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release:16.04 + linux-image-virtual: + Installed: 4.4.0.22.23 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 Man ref: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/lxc-copy.1.html Problem: The man package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591513] Re: lxc-copy: bdev/bdev.c: bdev_copy: 381 no such block device type: overlay

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release: 16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 + linux-image-virtual: + Installed: 4.4.0.22.23 Man ref: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/lxc-copy.1.html Problem: The man package references

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591510] Re: lxc-copy: unrecognized option '--backingstorage'

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
** Description changed: Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release:16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 Man ref: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/lxc-copy.1.html Problem: The man package references '-B' and '--backingstorage' as aliases of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591513] [NEW] lxc-copy: bdev/bdev.c: bdev_copy: 381 no such block device type: overlay

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Public bug reported: Description: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release: 16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 Man ref: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/lxc-copy.1.html Problem: The man package references 'overlay' as a backing storage type, but when the following command is

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591510] [NEW] lxc-copy: unrecognized option '--backingstorage'

2016-06-11 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Release:16.04 lxc:   Installed: 2.0.1-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 Man ref: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/man1/lxc-copy.1.html Problem: The man package references '-B' and '--backingstorage' as aliases of one another, but when the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1412758] Re: mirror method should with with file location

2015-03-30 Thread Jesse Pretorius
@r0lf Agreed that it is easy enough to workaround, so I wouldn't call it an urgent requirement - however, having to stand up a web server to host a file in the environment is an overhead which could be avoided if using a file was an option. When using configuration management tooling like ansible,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1412758] [NEW] mirror method should with with file location

2015-01-20 Thread Jesse Pretorius
Public bug reported: It'd be really great if the mirror method could be configured to use a local file for the mirror list. eg in /etc/apt/source.list.d/mysoftware.list deb mirror://file://apt/mirrors/mysoftware.txt trusty main Instead of pulling the file via http (as per current behaviour) and