[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

And now OPTIONS has to be exported, and probably should be protected against being empty in the new file. So it becomes ${OPTIONS:-} and ${1:-} What else have I missed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] Re: Xsessions has_option code error with fix

Bother. There is a third problem, a scope issue of some sort. The errors in ~/.xsession.error go away if "has_options" is moved from Xsession to its own file in Xsession.d I don't see why sourceing it should make any difference, but it does. $ cat /etc/X11/Xsession.d/00 has_option () { # Ens

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1995236] [NEW] Xsessions has_option code error with fix

Public bug reported: Jammy Jellyfish 22.04.1 LTS and others. There have been numerous bug reports and failed fixes for this over several years and releases. There are a couple of problems in /etc/X11/Xsessions where it fails to handle options, causing bogus error messages and, doubtless, many err

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885310] [NEW] Unable to add local printer. cups hanging

Public bug reported: Initially added epson c60 stylus but it installed with filter error. Deleted printer from cups , added new printer. Added the epson printer , selected the .ppd file that worked in 1904 and clicked add printer. Cups just sits and thinks. Same happens if I use the applications/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1848900] [NEW] blank display with Eoan Ermine live DVD on Rysen 2200G

Public bug reported: Regression with Ryzen 3 2200G, UEFI Asrock B450 Pro4 motherboard and 55-75 Hz monitor. Booting Xubuntu 19.10 live iso with safe graphics options did give a stable desktop display, but xubuntu@xubuntu:~$ xrandr xrandr: Failed to get size of gamma for output default Screen 0:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550846] Re: package identification is awful

Why is this still "incomplete"? What more needs to be added? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550846 Title: package identification is awful Status in appor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550846] Re: package identification is awful

I've just booted a few different releases. A live pre-release DVD of Mythbuntu from a few day ago does behave with "ubuntu-bug linux" and "ubuntu-bug apport" although it could have done better with; "ubuntu-bug kernel", "ubuntu-bug ubuntu-bug", "ubuntu-bug ubuntu", and "ubuntu-bug apport-bug". Th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1550846] [NEW] package identification is awful

Public bug reported: Recently I reported a bug against the kernel - apport made this very difficult. The instructions at clearly state that the correct thing to do is to report kernel bugs against the package "linux". That does not work. "ubuntu-b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481158] Re: sfdisk gets cylinder calculation wrong when using sectors

I suspect that this causes a problem that later versions do not clean up. In this case the sequences was (probably) partition with Trusty, install Trusty, delete Trusty, , install Wily (without re- partitioning). The current partition table as displayed by fdisk on Trusty is clearly wrong fo