Oliver, except it's not a phone, it's a converged computing device; I
use file:/// browsing in my desktop and expect to be able to do the same
when I replace my desktop with my phone, monitor, keyboard, and mouse.
John, I agree that the long run should definitely include an AppArmor
profile on
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Andrew, if you're using lightdm then you've got a different bug. Could
you open a new bug with ubuntu-bug apparmor and provide a description of
the problem you're having and include the relevant DENIED lines from
your logs?
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there. I repro'd using telegram.org's Linux client.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there. I was able to reproduce it 2 out of 6 tries,
so it doesn't seem to always happen every time, but it does happen.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
I think it is unclear what the desired result is here. On 15.10 when I
press quickly you can see the alt-tab switcher appear for a few milli-
seconds before the desired window appears, but just barely. Does this
count as a pass or a failure?
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Core Unity developers will not be adding any new features to Unity 7 at
this stage. As part of the big bug clear up for 16.04 this bug is being
marked as Opinion. While this bug is affecting you, and potentially
others, we are not considering working on it so it won't get fixed by
us. Other
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 874734 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874734
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 874734
Alt-Backtick Keyboard Shortcut Can Not Be Disabled
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797081
Title:
[dash] does not remember the user's
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. Unfortunately we can’t
work out how to recreate this bug from your description. Please describe
the process you go through to trigger this bug and then change the bug
status to NEW. See this page for more information.
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there. The system settings happily accept F1 as a
proper binding and it worked as expected.
** Changed in: unity
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311
Title:
Resizing windows by grabbing window
I was able to reproduce this on the latest version of Ubuntu (15.10) by
dragging a hyperlink from the browser to the edge of the screen, and
then letting it go (it doesn't matter where). The launcher will then not
reveal until (or equivalent) is pressed. This isn't the only way
to reproduce this,
I have been unable to reproduce this bug in the latest version of Ubuntu
(15.10). If someone still experiencing it could provide some hints
towards that end it would be immensely helpful. You don't seem to be
able to drag much over the launcher anymore (as George suggested might
reproduce it
I cannot reproduce this on the latest version of Ubuntu (15.10). Using a
mostly black wallpaper and Unity changes its colour to a dark blue/black
that looks just fine.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
As part of the big bug clear up for 16.04 this bug is being marked as
Opinion. While this bug is affecting you, and potentially others, we are
not considering working on it so it won't get fixed by us. Other
developers are free to pick this up and work on it. Sorry that we can't
offer you help at
Sebastien, makes sense, the global menubar doesn't seem to have window
titles in 14.04 LTS anyway.
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: unity
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Core Unity developers will not be adding any new features to Unity 7 at
this stage. As part of the big bug clear up for 16.04 this bug is being
marked as Opinion. While this bug is affecting you, and potentially
others, we are not considering working on it so it won't get fixed by
us. Other
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
I have been able to reproduce this in 15.10 to an extent. The window
rolls up and the titlebar disappears, but I haven't experienced any
screen artifacts or freezes on my Intel graphics.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940603
Title:
white box randomly shows up at top left corner
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu (15.04 and 15.10) and
cannot reproduce it. This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe
the problem to still exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please
comment on why that is
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1446081
Title:
Incorrect scaling of launcher icons
Status in Unity:
Confirmed
Reproduced on Ubuntu 15.10. As soon as I press "q" the dash closes.
** Changed in: unity
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
using the steps provided in the comment above and the bug is still
there.
A good workaround is to simply press the for for a second. You
can then grab the launcher's focus as before.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
Will, excellent. I too see an external usb keyboard works fine, built-in
lenovo t530 keyboard fails. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489205
Title:
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there. I usually work around it by changing the HUD
key combination to +, but this might not work for someone who
uses the HUD extensively (I do not).
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there. I reproduced by opening the context menu on
the desktop.
** Tags added: ubuntu-bugscrub-triaged
** Tags removed: ubuntu-bugscrub-triaged
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
As part of the big bug review for 16.04 LTS I have tested this on 15.10
and the bug is still there.
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
This isn't really a bug in Unity. If you turn off mouse pointer
integration (under the "Machine" menu) to prevent the host from stealing
the focus everything works like a charm. This means that with pointer
integration enabled and auto hide turned on when the mouse reaches the
edge of the screen
** Tags added: desktop-bugscrub-triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1490170
Title:
Dash displays "nothing that matches your search" before beginning a
Steps to reproduce: Under System Settings -> Privacy disable file and
application recording and clear all usage data (in the "Files and
Application" tab) and disable online dash results from the "Search"
tab.
The dash will now claim there is nothing to match your unprovided
"search".
--
You
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug. We have tried to
recreate this on the latest release of Ubuntu and cannot reproduce it.
This bug is being marked as Invalid. If you believe the problem to still
exist in the latest version of Ubuntu please comment on why that is the
case and change
dino99, I'm pretty sure you made a mistake here -- this particular
message has been included in every upgrade since time immemorial and is
likely to be around for as long as people still have gdk-pixbuf
installed. That error message you quoted is completely useless.
That's part of what makes this
Brendan, did you otherwise find the document useful? It's aged enough
that I've contemplated removing it entirely (or more likely, removing it
from our package builds to reduce the burden on builders, but that's
only worth doing if the thing itself is worth keeping...)
Is it worth keeping as-in?
Do you know if a CVE has been assigned for this issue?
Thanks
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to freetype in Ubuntu.
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Public bug reported:
aa-genprof / aa-autodep could automatically add #include
rules to the generated profiles.
pfak in #apparmor said it is tedious to do by hand and even more
annoying when it isn't already there.
Thanks
** Affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
I'm not sure how this got into a state where awk wasn't available. So,
I'm resetting to apt since it feels like something went wrong somewhere
other than OpenSSL.
** Package changed: openssl (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Are you sure that the Ubuntu OpenSSH should be running 'inside' the
crouton environment? Does crouton run things in a VM, or chroot, or full
containers?
There's many X11 errors mentioned there, are they indicative of bigger
problems in the crouton environment?
This is probably worth a parallel
It's complicated by the desire to avoid needing the CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE
capability in dhcpd. Some more information (but for a different file) is
at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1186662
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
Public bug reported:
I use unity 7 as a pseudo-tiling window manager: I slide terminals and
firefox to the sides of the screen to get them to automatically expand
to fill half of the screen space, similar to the Windows 7 feature.
I stack a firefox over urxvt on one side of the screen and use
Public bug reported:
I filed a new bug as requested in Bug #1108342
ctrl+alt+arrows works for up, down, left, right, up+right, down+left,
down+right. It does not work for up+left.
When I filed 1108342 I mentioned that this behaviour used to work in
12.04 LTS. I no longer have an easy way to
** Also affects: apparmor
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1489196
Title:
aa-genprof should display a clear
si nici un raspuns?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445595
Title:
Empty Trash Results in File Windows Opening
Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
New
Status
Public bug reported:
After changing the timezone the time displayed in the date/time
indicator is still in my old time zone. I sent a signal to the
indicator-datetime-service process, and after it restarted the correct
time was displayed.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package:
Andre, as I described in the previous comment, this bug is now useless
because it has been abused for too many tasks.
Please file a new bug, so that your logs and information can be
collected.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
how do we repair this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445595
Title:
Empty Trash Results in File Windows Opening
Status in One Hundred Papercuts:
New
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
There's a kernel stack dump in the logs and IO errors to block devices,
this is probably a kernel or hardware issue instead of X11 issue.
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) = linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
** Information type changed from Public Security to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unity in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1466137
Title:
unity --replace kills my session
Status in Unity:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
The following messages from your dmesg look like trouble..
[ 6196.836017] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x50)
[ 6196.836036] ata1.01: exception Emask 0x50 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x40d0802 action 0x0
frozen
[ 6196.836041] ata1.01: SError: { RecovComm HostInt PHYRdyChg CommWake 10B8B
DevExch }
[
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Reviewing your dmesg attachment to this bug report it
seems that there may be a problem with your hardware. I'd recommend
performing a back up and then investigating the situation. Measures you
might take
At least /etc/pam.d/sshd on my system is configured to use pam_loginuid:
$ grep pam_login -r /etc/pam.d/
/etc/pam.d/sshd:sessionrequired pam_loginuid.so
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to audit in
[ 15.940712] vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.3.10_Ubuntu (interface
0x001a0007).
[ 14.431291] vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.3.10_Ubuntu (interface
0x001a0007).
Drawing conclusions from only two tests may be asking for trouble, but
it looks like you've experienced 1.5 seconds
** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1270257
Title:
NetworkManager failed to
Twente, that's because this bug is useless for fixing any issues -- I
originally filed the bug with 13.10, which has been EOL for 1.5 years.
Others added completely unrelated bugs here along the way rather than
filing new bugs for their issues. Once this turned into a wasteland of
unrelated
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1461834
Title:
1024-bit signing keys should be
It might be nice if apt could be configured with minimum accepted
algorithms or required algorithms, to allow administrators to require
e.g. sha256 or sha3 or blake2b, or rsa 4096 or ed25519, etc.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages,
Please see bug #1244635 -- I'm afraid this bug may re-introduce 1244635
if not handled carefully.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lxc in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472142
Title:
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
I could have sworn I wrote a response to this weeks ago. Bummer.
If you use gpg --symmetric without using -r, you can create a file that
requires using the passphrase to decrypt it; I don't think any of the
various gpg agents will cache symmetric passphrases.
If you want to disable use of a gpg
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
I suspect this code ought to be amended to ask a service how much space
is free for caching; users are liable to get cranky if they can't take
more photos because a webapp cached a few gigabytes of cat gifs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears
to be a regular (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security
issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to
cross
NTP uses UDP port 123. The pasted conky configuration doesn't monitor
any UDP ports.
Thanks
** Information type changed from Private Security to Public
** Changed in: ntp (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch
I've also reproduced it in a VM using Stefan's method. Both Stefan and I
have verified that stubbing out or removing /etc/init/mounted-tmp.conf
eliminates the problem, so it seems that this job is getting triggered
somehow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Also I forgot to mention that Chris Arges pointed out that there's a
eglibc postinst script which does a re-exec of upstart, which is an
important piece of the puzzle.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to eglibc in
1401 - 1500 of 1771 matches
Mail list logo
