I'm really new to the "bug"(?) and a bit overwhelmed about all the
information here. The last post is over one year ago but the ticket is
still open.
Can someone please give a summary about the current state of the problem
and maybe a workaround.
I'm not sure but it seems to me that this really f
Dear Marc,
thanks for reporting back. It is not clear for me what you intend to tell me
with the link.
Do you tell me that you backported all security fixes from Python 3.6.15
(the latest 3.6) back into your Python 3.6.5?
The ubuntu changelog doesn't indicate that.
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/c
I opened a "question" at the rsync package
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+question/705772
And I also informed the rsync upstream maintainer about the situation.
As a workaround until Ubuntu fixed the rsync-update-bug I would advice to use
Back In Time from upstream (GitHub r
I'm not happy about the situation. But maybe I'm to conservative about
it.
There is no known security problem with BIT. So you shouldn't use the
security repo to update it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to rsyn
Dear Marc,
thanks for explaining and your patience.
I think I'm a bit blinded here because of my "Debian stable" experience.
I also mixed up the terms "stable" and "LTS" which seems not to be the
same.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages
Please re-open and report back if you can reproduce the problem with the
latest upstream(!) version Back In Time.
Be aware that the latest version (1.3.3-4) in Ubuntu is out dated.
** Changed in: backintime (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
Do I understand that website correct, that lauchpad ist the UPSTREAM for
network-manager?
WPS is a well known standard and important to make a desktop system
usable. There is a high need to implement this in network manager do
come closer to a usable and ergonomic "desktop linux".
--
You receive
Public bug reported:
Please implement the option '--yes' (known from apt-get) in apt itself.
It is not available in Ubuntu 16.04 Beta.
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: apt xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
I mean e.g. "apt install sauerbraten --yes"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1566657
Title:
[apt] implement --yes
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
I think it is mix of my misstake and missing documentation.
"--yes"works but is not documented in the manpage of "apt".
For the user it doesn't matter if apt use "--yes" itself or just give it to the
underlying apt-get or anything else.
The user use "apt" to don't even think about anymore about
10 matches
Mail list logo
