[Touch-packages] [Bug 2004592] Re: aalogparse.h cannot be included from C++ code

** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Ryan Lee (rlee287) ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083435] Re: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record

After rechecking https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/tree/debian/patches/ubuntu Alex Murray found that this second patch in comment #4 was already applied in the last upload of the apparmor package, so we don't have to apply the patch again. -- You received this bug notification bec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083435] Re: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record

While we're at it, John Johansen also decided to include this patch, which fixes a critical bug in which the rule priority directives could destroy permissions for some classes. ** Patch added: "Patch for commit 204c0c5a3a34ac2eb47b863aae20bace48e0ad3c downloaded from Gitlab" https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083435] Re: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record

Gitlab MR has been merged, with commit c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b fixing the ABI break. Patch is attached. ** Description changed: Commit 3c825eb001d33bb6f2480c4f78df03aee4c40396 in the Gitlab upstream adds a field called `execpath` to the `aa_log_record` struct. This field wa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083435] Re: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record

** Patch added: "Patch of commit c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b downloaded from GitLab" https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/2083435/+attachment/5823945/+files/c86c87e8868c72e5ab2084b5bf783cd5ca800a9b.patch ** Description changed: Commit 3c825eb001d33bb6f2480c4f78df03aee4c403

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2083435] Re: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record

** Tags added: oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083435 Title: AppArmor 4.1.0-beta1 contains an ABI break for aa_log_record Status in AppArmor:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] Re: lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

I generated the smaller diff with: $ diff -u <(awk '{print $6}' lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu7_amd64.deb.contents ) <(awk '{print $6}' lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu8_amd64.deb.contents) > file- list.diff so one can just see which files were added/removed vs the date/timestamp change on files that are in both ar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] Re: lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

dpkg --contents lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu8_amd64.deb output ** Attachment added: "dpkg --contents lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu8_amd64.deb output" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2080069/+attachment/5814927/+files/lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu8_amd64.deb.contents -- You received this bug noti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] Re: lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

** Patch added: "Diff of dpkg --contents file column only between 7 and 8" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2080069/+attachment/5814925/+files/file-list.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] Re: lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

dpkg --contents on lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu7_amd64.deb ** Attachment added: "output from dpkg --contents on lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu7_amd64.deb" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/2080069/+attachment/5814926/+files/lxc-dev_5.0.3-2ubuntu7_amd64.deb.contents -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] [NEW] lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

Public bug reported: 1) # lsb_release -rd No LSB modules are available. Description:Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Release:24.04 2) # apt-cache policy lxc-dev lxc-dev: Installed: 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu7 Candidate: 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu7 Version table: *** 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu7 500 500 http://archive.u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2080069] Re: lxc-dev does not provide liblxc.a any more

I'm not sure exactly how the liblxc.a static lib was dropped, but the attached debdiff resolves this by not removing all .a files (an extra find|rm is around a comment about removing all .la files) and then adding the file to lxc-dev.install This produces a lxc-dev deb which includes the static l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063381] Re: NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0

** Description changed: When specifying vers=4.0 or nfsvers=4.0 in NFSv4 mount options, the client ends up using version 4.2 instead. This option seems to be ignored. This happens with pam_mount and manual mount. We have been using pam_mount for years with the option vers=4.0, but now

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063381] [NEW] NFS Client can't mount via NFS version 4.0

Public bug reported: When specifying vers=4.0 or nfsvers=4.0 in NFSv4 mount options, the client ends up using version 4.2 instead. This option seems to be ignored. This happens with pam_mount and manual mount. We have been using pam_mount for years with the option vers=4.0, but now it appears to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055793] Re: [regression] Wine program crashes with unhandled page fault on startup

** Summary changed: - Wine program crashes with unhandled page fault on startup + [regression] Wine program crashes with unhandled page fault on startup -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055793] [NEW] Wine program crashes with unhandled page fault on startup

Public bug reported: Today, APT Performed the following update: Start-Date: 2024-03-02 16:23:10 Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-commit-packages' sender=':1.304' Upgrade: tcpdump:amd64 (4.99.1-3ubuntu0.1, 4.99.1-3ubuntu0.2), libglx-mesa0:amd64 (23.0.4-0ubuntu1~22.04.1, 23.2.1-1ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045574] [NEW] Ubuntu 22.04 missing CMake installation files from 9.0.0

Public bug reported: As reported in the following question, Ubuntu 22.04 is currently missing the CMake installation files from tinyxml version 9.0.0. https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tinyxml2/+question/708581 These were added in the following source PR as part of the 9.0.0 release:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039235] Re: gnome-online-accounts -> when signing into google account, infinite loading after entering password

Can confirm that the workaround worked for me as well. I had a yubikey on my google account and that was what caused the issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-online-accounts in Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039235] Re: gnome-online-accounts -> when signing into google account, infinite loading after entering password

** Attachment added: "ProcCPUinfoFull.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2039235/+attachment/5712189/+files/ProcCPUinfoFull.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gnome-o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039235] Re: gnome-online-accounts -> when signing into google account, infinite loading after entering password

I am facing this issue on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS as well so I suspect that this is not related to the operating system per se but more of the package and how it interacts with google. I have attached my dependencies as well as my full cpuinfo. ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036373] [NEW] package cups-bsd 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.5 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Public bug reported: I am attempting to install Zoom onto my laptop. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: cups-bsd 2.3.1-9ubuntu1.5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-83.92~20.04.1-generic 5.15.116 Uname: Linux 5.15.0-8

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959103] Re: polkitd crashes with segfault with specific config file

I also have this bug on Ubuntu 22.04 following this guide, aside from setting it to my user. https://code.luasoftware.com/tutorials/linux/ubuntu-prompt-system-policy-prevents-modification-of-network-settings-for-all-users [Let all users modify system settings for network] Identity=unix-user:ryan

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000170] Re: bond interface down: device or resource busy

** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2000170 Title: bond interface down: devi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

** Also affects: systemd (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2000325 Title: ipv6 duplicate address pr

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# networkctl status eth2-2 --no-pager ● 2: eth2-2 Link File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth2-2.link Network File: /run/systemd/network/10-netplan-eth2-2.network Type:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

There are two scenarios: Applying to VM the first time, on subsequent boots. On first boot without the updated netplan config, when you first add it root@ubuntu:/home/ubuntu# ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

** Attachment added: "netplan config for vm2" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2000325/+attachment/5637221/+files/50-v4-v6-fail-vm2.yaml -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

** Attachment added: "netplan config for vm1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2000325/+attachment/5637220/+files/50-v4-v6-fail-vm1.yaml -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

# Create a bridge and add two ports $ sudo ip link add name atx-fabric0 type bridge $ sudo ip link set up dev atx-fabric0 $ sudo ip tuntap add atx-fabric0i1p1 user $USER group $USER $ sudo ip tuntap add atx-fabric0i2p1 user $USER group $USER # create two focal VM images from focal daily server $

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] Re: ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

To reproduce what happens on physical systems I create two VMs with nics in the same bridge on the host. Booting the first VM up and allowing the network config to apply, and then when booting the second VM up layer, as it applies the IPv6 address to the interface in the bridge, the kernel detects

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000325] [NEW] ipv6 duplicate address prevents interface configuration

Public bug reported: 1) # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS Release:20.04 2) # apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 Candidate: 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 Version table: *** 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 500 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2000170] [NEW] bond interface down: device or resource busy

Public bug reported: 1) # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS Release:20.04 2) # apt-cache policy systemd systemd: Installed: 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 Candidate: 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 Version table: *** 245.4-4ubuntu3.19 500 500 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1981154] [NEW] package linux-image-5.13.0-52-generic 5.13.0-52.59~20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools exited with return code 1

Public bug reported: possibly relating to locked boot disk. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: linux-image-5.13.0-52-generic 5.13.0-52.59~20.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-28.31~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19 Uname: Linux 5.13.0-28-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978871] Re: apt package missing apt-auto-removal

Simply stating that you no longer protect the last installed kernel and providing a link to the details is preferred over making one feel inadequate for reporting a perceived issue. "apt-auto-removal" is not specifically mentioned in the changelog since v0.9.12, and apt-file continues to indicate

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1978871] [NEW] apt package missing apt-auto-removal

Public bug reported: #> lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS Release:20.04 #> apt-cache policy apt apt: Installed: 2.0.9 Candidate: 2.0.9 Version table: *** 2.0.9 500 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970076] Re: "User process fault: interruption code 0011 ilc:3" on SSH client/server upon Jammy upgrade

client/server upon Jammy upgrade Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: This s390x VM has been upgraded to Jammy, including the host (qemu- system-s390x 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6). Now any attempt to use ssh, or any incoming sshd attempt immediately results in e.g.:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970076] Re: "User process fault: interruption code 0011 ilc:3" on SSH client/server upon Jammy upgrade

to use ssh, or any incoming sshd attempt immediately results in e.g.: ryan@s390x-dev:~$ ssh g...@github.com [ 433.672800] User process fault: interruption code 0011 ilc:3 in libc.so.6[3ffa6c0+1ca000] [ 433.672946] Failing address: 02aa0b84d000 TEID: 02aa0b84d800 [ 433.672

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1970076] [NEW] "User process fault: interruption code 0011 ilc:3" on SSH client/server upon Jammy upgrade

Public bug reported: This s390x VM has been upgraded to Jammy, including the host (qemu- system-s390x 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6). Now any attempt to use ssh, or any incoming sshd attempt immediately results in e.g.: ryan@s390x-dev:~$ ssh g...@github.com [ 433.672800] User process fault: interruption

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1922414] Re: ssh-agent fails to start (has_option: command not found)

This is still broken on impish when running i3 under X11. Oct 22 15:23:39 operations /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[5615]: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/30x11-common_xresources: line 16: has_option: command not found Oct 22 15:23:39 operations /usr/libexec/gdm-x-session[5646]: /etc/X11/Xsession.d/75dbus_dbus

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1946883] [NEW] Merge openldap from Debian unstable for 22.04

t for smbk5pwd. * Stop disabling test060-mt-hot on ppc64el. The underlying kernel bug (#866122) is fixed in all relevant suites by now. -- Ryan Tandy Fri, 27 Aug 2021 09:42:31 -0700 openldap (2.4.57+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Link smbk5pwd with -lkrb5. (Closes: #9

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] Re: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers

It also looks like, farther down, systemctl_redirect() leaks $service. Not sure if it's intentional or not, given that it works to protect its other variables, so maybe it could use some attention too. https://gist.github.com/TheWug/e120145f08e994d89e235e077a82ea75#file-40-systemd-L70 -- You rec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] Re: systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers

I'm not a bash script architect, but I bodged together this workaround and the ipmiutil_wdt service starts correctly with it applied to my system: https://gist.github.com/TheWug/1a7f509e040f10c05039acc06fe29d9e -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1940008] [NEW] systemd lsb-base integration script leaking shell variable changes which can break consumers

Public bug reported: I am using systemd version 248.3-1ubuntu3 from the impish repository. It was compiled and built in the following manner: # add impish deb-src repository to apt sources apt build-dep systemd/impish apt source -b systemd/impish Once built, it was installed over the top of syst

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 06:46:02PM -, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >Ryan, IIUC the patch you're proposing fixes the issue experienced by >Stephane, but we're not entirely sure that it's the same issue being >reported in this bug. Am I right? Yes, exactly. (My debd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926265] Re: slapd enter in infinite loop on sched_yield syscall

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:36:12PM -, Stephane Chazelas wrote: >The important backtrace in there is the one from thread 11: > >#0 0x7fb288428474 in read () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 >No symbol table info available. >#1 0x7fb2890c4518 in ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857552] Re: [81NX, Realtek ALC285, Speaker, Internal] No sound at all

There is a patch now that is expected to be in kernel version 5.13. If you're willing to build your own kernel, you can find the patch here and do it yourself: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2748 ** Bug watch added: github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues #2748 https://github.com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1857198] Re: alsa ALC285 Missing still, No Sound Lenovo Ideapad S740

There is a patch now that is expected to be in kernel version 5.13. If you're willing to build your own kernel, you can find the patch here and do it yourself: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/2748 ** Bug watch added: github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues #2748 https://github.com

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1576559] Re: Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

@Daniel van Vugt - Thank you for suggesting the change in post #60. It didn't work for me though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576559 Title: Refused

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1921562] [NEW] Intermittent hangs during ldap_search_ext when TLS enabled

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 01:06:42AM -, Vincent Vanlaer wrote: >https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/735e1ab Note that this commit is for OpenLDAP 2.5 and needs adjustment for the 2.4 branch. The commit ids for 2.4 are: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/7cf7aa3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 571481] Re: when slapd upgrade fails, later upgrade attempts overwrite saved backups of pre-upgrade configuration files

Fixed in 2.4.51+dfsg-1 i.e. groovy ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ryan Tandy (rtandy) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: openldap (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1916509] [NEW] Update PAM and PAM modules

Public bug reported: I want to implement pam_faillock which replaces pam_tally2 but requires pam version >= 1.4.0 The ability to 'reliably' lock accounts after a certain number of failed attempts is a requirement of the NIST 800-171 controls implemented by many U.S. government agencies and cont

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Thank you for all of your help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140 Title: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan Status in systemd package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

The BIOS update does indeed fix the type interface number issue. This ticket can be marked as a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1578141 and closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

There's a BIOS update available for my board. I'll install this and hopefully I won't need a SW fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908140 Title: Bond DHC

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

I thought this could be related to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199813. Indeed dmidecode -t 41 shows there are two interfaces for type interface 1 and two for 2. ** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #199813 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199813 -- You recei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] Re: Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

> your bonded links are down; nothing will happen until they are brought up. Yes, I figured as such. I've already tried to bring up eth0, eth1, and bond0 via ip, ifup, and ifconfig to no success. > your pasted log appears incomplete since i see no output for eth0 or eth1; please paste or attach y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1908140] [NEW] Bond DHCP fails on Ubuntu Server 20.04 netplan

Public bug reported: I recently installed Ubuntu Server 20.04 to replace an ESXi server. During the installation, I configured a bonded interface for two ethernet interfaces. I configured the bond on my ZyXel GS1900-8 as a static LAG. During the setup process, the link came up successfully and was

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1267866] Re: usb audio: cannot get ctl value: req = 0x81, wValue = 0x0, wIndex = 0x1400, type = 3

Just a heads up.. Noticed this post digging into the same exact syptoms with a schiit hel on arch linux. (5.8.8 kernel). I was able to resolve the lack of audio by installing and using pulsemixer. Using pulsemixer if you hit f3 (cards) and set the audio source from off to digital stereo duplex it s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1887210] Re: USB DAC/AMP unselectable from Sound Settings and crashes alsamixer

Just a heads up.. Noticed this post digging into the same exact syptoms with a schiit hel on arch linux. (5.8.8 kernel). I was able to resolve the lack of audio by installing and using pulsemixer. Using pulsemixer if you hit f3 (cards) and set the audio source from off to digital stereo duplex it s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1888726] Re: systemd-udevd regression: some renamed network interfaces stuck in "pending" state

@Dan Just ran into this issue in curtin's vmtest for network_vlan on groovy. I can confirm that if the netplan config includes the driver match on the physical interfaces, then the vlans come up just fine. I was thinking that netplan could inject the driver of the underlying device into the match

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891684] [NEW] screen flickers

Public bug reported: when computer is coming out of suspension mode, i get terrible screen flickers. Only way i have worked around this is a reboot. This video card is from sapphire Nitro + SE 5700xt ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignatur

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1891548] Re: autofs-ldap's /etc/ldap/schema/autofs.schema crashes slapd

msp3k is correct. The bug is in autofs-ldap, not in slapd. slapd is correct to reject "caseExactMatch" since the attribute syntax is IA5 String. The correct fix is what msp3k said, fix the matching rule to be caseExactIA5Match like it was in the old one. --- /etc/ldap/schema/autofs.schema 20

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1405452] Re: Typo in man page ("introduce a much improvement mechanism")

Looks like a patch was created some time ago. What steps are required in order to close out this bug? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1405452 Title: Typo in man

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

@Rafael It's in both places: https://github.com/koverstreet/bcache-tools/pull/1 I can update the PR there as well; though I don't think upstream cares as Kent's working on bcachefs instead of bcache AFAICT. > I see that you are trying to come up with something nor relying in the kernel fix (to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

@Rafael For bcache-tools changes, bcache-export-cached-uuid needs the full path to bcache-super-show, as PATH is not exported when running from udev. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1885948] Re: systemd 229 / dbus 1.10.6-1ubuntu3.5 (16.04) and systemd 237 / dbus 1.12.2-1ubuntu1.1 (18.04) error with "Failed to get properties: Access denied" when ran as non-ro

Here's an annotated strace output of the dbus process when it fails. In another terminal, I ran 'systemctl status ntp' which triggers the dbus query. As Zahid mentioned above, this is with the permissions on /etc/ldap.conf set to 440, so the dbus-daemon user doesn't have permissions to read it.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

@ddstreet I'm not sure where upstream is going just yet. For Ubuntu; I think 1) Adjusting the bcache-tools patch to use the full path to bcache- super-show should change; 2) If we fix (1) then I think we can drop the systemd patch from a bug fixing perspective; on the openSUSE image I did testi

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:35 AM Balint Reczey <1861...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > @raharper I've forwarded the systemd fix for you with minimal tidying of > the commit message https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16317 Thanks! > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are su

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1693900] Re: apt-get update should return exit code != 0 on error

@Julian Andres Klode Is this something you'd be willing to reassess? I saw your old message [1] on the Debian list that says: > The question what a successful update is is complicated and depends on the expections of the person using APT. With that in mind, I'd say there are situations where it'

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

systemd debdiff with a fix to skip creating /dev/disk/by-uuid for bcache backing, caching devices. ** Patch added: "lp1861941-skip-bcache-links.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcache-tools/+bug/1861941/+attachment/5375730/+files/lp1861941-skip-bcache-links.debdiff -- You r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

Updated test to be a bit more resilient. ** Attachment added: "test-bcache-byuuid-links-fixed.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/+bug/1861941/+attachment/5375723/+files/test-bcache-byuuid-links-fixed.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

Tarball of a source package with a fix for this issue: bcache-tools_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz bcache-tools_1.0.8-4ubuntu1_amd64.build bcache-tools_1.0.8-4ubuntu1_amd64.buildinfo bcache-tools_1.0.8-4ubuntu1_amd64.changes bcache-tools_1.0.8-4ubuntu1_amd64.deb bcache-tools_1.0.8-4ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz bcache

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

debdiff of the changes ** Attachment added: "bcache-tools-debdiff-1.0.8-4_to_1.0.8-4ubuntu1" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/+bug/1861941/+attachment/5375722/+files/bcache-tools-debdiff-1.0.8-4_to_1.0.8-4ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

OK. I've reviewed the kernel code, and there are no unexpected changes w.r.t the CACHED_UUID change event. So I don't think we will need any kernel changes which is good. With the small change to the 60-persistent-storage.rules to not attempt to create a /dev/disk/by-uuid symlink for the backing

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1880209] [NEW] slapd configuration does not ask for olcbackend and doesn't add one. Has to be added by hand.

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 04:34:52PM -, Mario Mech wrote: >Installing slapd and ldap-utils results in missing backend > >dn: olcBackend={0}mdb,cn=config > >the installer skips the installation step. Has to be added by >ldpamodify. This was done intentionally as it's much more common to configure

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

@Balint I do not thing the fix you're released is correct, can you upload a new version without the scripts? Also, we should fix make-bcache -B to ensure that cset.uuid is not initialized; that may be why the kernel thinks it should emit the CACHED_UUID if the suerpblock of the device has a cset.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

Digging deeper and walking through this in a focal vm, I'm seeing some strange things. Starting with a clean disk, and just creating the backing device like so: make-bcache -B /dev/vdb We see /dev/bcache0 get created with vdb as the backing device. Now, after this, I see: /dev/bcache/by-uuid/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

That doesn't explain why they show up sometimes, but not all of the time. There are 3 devices in play here. * The backing device, let's say /dev/vda; this is where we want to store the data. * The caching device, let's say /dev/vdb; this holds the cache. * The bcache device; this only appears

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1861941] Re: bcache by-uuid links disappear after mounting bcache0

I guess I don't understand why we see this in focal. The two events in Colin's trace always happen on any Ubuntu kernel. We should see if we can get another udev trace on bionic that captures both CHANGE events, one will be from the bcache driver itself, and one is from the block layer. THe orde

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1878752] Re: vgcreate fails on /dev/disk/by-dname block devices

I would very much agree with xnox (it's a duplicate) (and Dan, nothing for curtin to do); curtin generated dname rules rely upon pointing to a /dev/bcache/by- uuid/* symlink which is currently broken per https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed/+bug/1861941 which at this time points

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1878081] [NEW] dbus-launch of gnome-terminal slow on 20.04

Public bug reported: Since upgrading to 20.04 I've seen a roughly 20 second delay between running 'dbus-launch gnome-terminal' and when the terminal actually opens. This happens 100% of the time and was basically instant on previous versions (I've tried on 18.04, 19.04, and 19.10). I've tried exp

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1875697] Re: drop fix-ldap-distribution.patch?

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:57:38PM -, Andreas Hasenack wrote: >But looks like the email is wrong, we should be showing ubuntu-devel@ >there instead of the debian maintainers list. I'm fine with receiving mail from Ubuntu users as well. (in IRC I'm usually supporting at least as many Ubuntu u

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1576559] Re: Refused to switch profile to headset_head_unit: Not connected

I"ve had this problem on a clean install of 20.04 on a new laptop, with two headsets that support both profiles. ``` Name: Soundcore Life 2 Alias: Soundcore Life 2 Class: 0x00240404 Icon: audio-card Paired: yes Trusted: yes Blocked: no Connected: yes LegacyPairing: no UUID: Headset

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876831] Re: Microbit WebUSB Udev Rule Missing

working. If it is where Ubuntu 19.10 and 19.04 (and maybe even earlier) worked then I wouldn't be opening this bug. Thanks - Ryan ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: udev 245.4-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30 U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876831] Re: Microbit WebUSB Udev Rule Missing

4 (and maybe even earlier) worked then I wouldn't be opening this bug. Thanks - Ryan ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: udev 245.4-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876831] Re: Microbit WebUSB Udev Rule Missing

aybe even earlier) worked then I wouldn't be opening this bug. Thanks - Ryan ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: udev 245.4-4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-28.32-generic 5.4.30 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-28-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876831] [NEW] Microbit WebUSB Udev Rule Missing

ot on another I suspect I won't be the only user wondering why it isn't working. If it is where Ubuntu 19.10 and 19.04 (and maybe even earlier) worked then I wouldn't be opening this bug. Thanks - Ryan ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: udev 245.4-4ubuntu3

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874501] Re: vgscan --mknodes creates block device multipath nodes in /dev/mapper

Probert PR to drop --mknodes: https://github.com/canonical/probert/pull/88 Curtin MP to drop --mknodes https://code.launchpad.net/~raharper/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/383141 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874501] Re: vgscan --mknodes creates block device multipath nodes in /dev/mapper

I don't think this is the right fix. We need to test that it doesn't prevent vgscan from finding and creating /dev/vg/lv device files outside of of multipath. The real fix involves: 1) omitting the call to vgmknodes if there are no volume groups present 2) if vgnodes are present, device_mapp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1875697] [NEW] drop fix-ldap-distribution.patch?

Public bug reported: Hi, In version 2.4.49+dfsg-3 I fixed a bug where the version was missing from the -V output in OpenLDAP programs: . At the same time, I've patched it to display the package version there, instead of the upstream version: # slapd -VV @(#) $Ope

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874501] Re: vgscan --mknodes creates block device multipath nodes in /dev/mapper

This patch configures the dm_task to use the DM_UDEV_DISABLE_LIBRARY_FALLBACK udev flag to prevent calls to dm_mknodes() from using the library fallback code. Another possible fix would be to obtain a different return code from vgscan.c where it does not detect any VGs and then calls the mknode p

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1874501] Re: vgscan --mknodes creates block device multipath nodes in /dev/mapper

Note, the whitespace damage in the patch is not needed, just my text client cleaning up trailing whitespace. With this patch applied, vgscan --mknodes no longer creates block devices in /dev/mapper root@ubuntu:/dev/mapper# ls -al total 0 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 Apr 28 16:31 . drwxr-xr-x 1

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871182] Re: [RTL810xE] No ethernet connection

@Paolo, test kernel didn't work for me. I had to reinstall official Realtek driver again like i did in #3. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871182 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1871182] Re: [RTL810xE] No ethernet connection

Ethernet stopped working again after update today. @vicamo here are the results for would you suggested in #8. It does appear that realtek.ko was included automatically for me but still not working. finisdiem@finisdiem-HP-Pavilion-g6-Notebook-PC:~$ sudo modprobe -r realtek [sudo] password for fin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870850] Re: Multi-line paste broken between kitty and nano 4.8 [focal]

Thanks Benno. Yeah, I've tested that works (albeit with s,'\r',CR_CODE, on the - line since focal is currently 4.8). I've asked -release if it's possible to get a sync exception for 4.9.1-1 from sid since focal is past the freeze, rather than trying to SRU this (and e.g. LP: #1866820 crash); wait

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870850] Re: Multi-line paste broken between kitty and nano 4.8 [focal]

** Summary changed: - Multi-line paste broken between kitty ~0.15 and nano 8.4 [focal] + Multi-line paste broken between kitty and nano 4.8 [focal] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to nano in Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870850] [NEW] Multi-line paste broken between kitty ~0.15 and nano 8.4 [focal]

Public bug reported: Ubuntu 20.04 Focal beta (as of 2020-04-04) nano 4.8-1 What I expect to happen: multi-line paste into nano via kitty pastes multiple lines. What happens instead: pasted multi-line text is one line with no line breaks. There is a bit of a spat between the developers of kitty

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870725] Re: artifacts appearing on gnome shell

I believed I narrowed down the issue to how gnome-shell uses Xorg. As said before GDM did not have any issues, and (i may be seriously wrong here) GDM uses Wayland by default. When I launch the Ubuntu desktop with Wayland, the graphical issue went away and is running smoothly. So I narrowed down

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870725] Re: artifacts appearing on gnome shell

No problem! When I change wallpapers the issue appears goes away but on reboot or switching back the issue persists. it appears to not affect other applications such as Firefox even when in full screen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1870725] [NEW] artifacts appearing on gnome shell

Public bug reported: problems appear on the desktop and lock screen (not in gdm) ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu22 Architecture:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >