[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-09-09 Thread Bill Filler
** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ofono-qt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1613469 Title: [MIR] ofono-qt Status in ofono-qt package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-09-09 Thread Bill Filler
We will no longer need this in main once the telephony-service silo land that removes depends on telepathy-ofono. That work is in silo https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/1902 and we're fighting with build and test issues, hope to have it resolved in the next day or so. ** Changed in: of

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-25 Thread Bill Filler
** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ofono-qt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Gustavo Pichorim Boiko (boiko) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ofono-qt in Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-24 Thread Michael Terry
Using ofono-phonesim and scripting the manual interactions (like starting a call, restarting ofono) all seems like perfect a candidate for autopkgtest (rather than a unit test, where you may not want to mess up your dev system). The custom patches to ofono-qt are all the more reason to migrate to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-24 Thread Tiago Salem Herrmann
- libqofono did not exist by the time telepathy-ofono was created, and ofono-qt was the only alternative. libqofono started as a fork of ofono- qt IIRC. - The tests work with ofono-phonesim (actually phonesim is required). - Some tests require manual interaction: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23085781/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-24 Thread Michael Terry
Especially since the rest of our stack apparently uses libqofono... See bug 1612702 that wants it in main for indicator-network, address-book- app and ubuntu-system-settings. Why did we choose onofo-qt for telepathy-ofono? How much work would it be to switch to libqofono and standardize, so we d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-23 Thread Michael Terry
ofono-phonesim wouldn't work for tests? Do we have a roadmap to switching to libqofono? As a general rule, we don't like to officially support already-abandoned code with an existing replacement if we can help it. It would be nice to know that we do have a plan. -- You received this bug notifi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-23 Thread Tiago Salem Herrmann
Tests are not executed because they rely on ofonod running with some modem enabled, which is not doable on test environments. Yes, it was abandoned upstream because ofono-qt was mostly replaced by libqofono. This is the main reason why it has no bugs open. There was some discussion to move telep

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1613469] Re: [MIR] ofono-qt

2016-08-19 Thread Michael Terry
Questions: - Tests aren't being run, do we know why? - This is apparently abandoned upstream. And we don't share the package with Debian. It doesn't seem to need much maintenance, but do we have resources paying attention to this? There are no open bugs in LP, which encourages but shocks me. N