** Description changed:
- I have upgraded to the oracular beta yesterday on my home machine. After
- upgrading I started to notice errors issued by libgio that MOUNT_2_40
- could not be found despite having libmount1 2.40.2 installed as part the
- upgrade.
+ In April 2024, while handling the t64 t
I am glad that it was a specific case. I was holding off updating any
other machines to oracular for fear of having to go through the same
thing. I had not realised that t64 packages were temporary and were all
replaced with other versions later. As I said before, I will be carrying
out an audit of
Then I guess it confirms the hypothesis we had, you most probably had
the bad luck of updating/upgrading during the time frame the package
came with libmount1t64 in proposed back in April.
I will try to summarize this in the bug description to help anyone else
who ended up in this situation, feel
Yes, the machine in question is a test machine which gets updated once
the beta comes out. The update to noble was no different and like this
upgrade, I had upgraded around a month before actual release.
At the time due to the XZ debacle, I had also had to use proposed with a
pin priority of 500 t
Looking at a machine that was upgraded to noble past the release date, I
have no t64 packages installed at all. On the test machine I remember
having around 5 such t64 packages getting installed at the time. I will
check again to see if there are any still lingering around and replace
them with the
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684
Title:
Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found
Status in uti
We kept digging in the publishing history and we have an hypothesis.
Did you upgrade to noble before the release (maybe sometimes between 2024-04-18
and 2024-04-23)?
Do you use the proposed pocket?
During the t64 transition and the rebuild/republish of some packages
just prior the release maybe
Could it be that there is no new version of libmount1t64 and that
libmount1 has no "Replaces:" for libmount1t64?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684
Ti
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
I believe the issue was then due to the interrupted upgrade process. The
system probably ended up in a undefined state. Moreover I do not think I
can reasonably reproduce.
There is most likely nothing wrong with the packages.
I am marking it as Invalid and w
Dear Mr. Mars,
Thank you for your reply.
I had upgraded directly from noble a day after the oracular beta was
released.
I started the process using "do-release-upgrade" (due to past issues
with the graphical updater) but for some reason, my lock screen
triggered (I should have ran the upgrade in
Hello borgdylan,
I understand the similar issue in arch was caused by glib2 2.80 being
built against a version of util-linux not yet published. I understand it
was fixed when `util-linux-2.40rc2-1` was made available.
In our case, I checked that our current version of glib2
(https://launchpad.net
** Tags removed: rls-oo-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684
Title:
Things depending on libmount1 complain MO
** Changed in: util-linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Paul Mars (upils)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684
Title:
Things depending on li
** Tags added: rls-oo-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081684
Title:
Things depending on libmount1 complain MOUNT_2_40 not found
Status in util
The issue was caused by the fact that libmount1t64 v. 2.39.3 was not
removed during the upgrade. It was conflicting with the new libmount1
2.40.2. When I removed the offending package things started to work as
intended.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touc
This is a reddit post regarding the issue that occured on arch a few
months ago:
https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/1bm97il/unborking_your_system_mount_2_40/?rdt=42674
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
16 matches
Mail list logo
