[Touch-packages] [Bug 2050033] Re: gettext: msgfmt --java2 does not support Java 21

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Unsubscribing ubuntu sponsors as already subscribed to the merge -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gettext in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2050033 Title: gettext: msgfmt --java2 does not support Jav

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045455] Re: add-apt-repository crashed with --- in _request()

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Presumably the add-apt-repository command failed while trying to add a private PPA here due to you not being authorized to access it (maybe not logged in?), can you tell us which PPA did you try to add? ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2045455] Re: add-apt-repository crashed with --- in _request()

2024-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Nevermind, a non-existent or private PPA has been tried to add and software-properties should properly surface the error to you. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged ** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming ** Tags added: foundations-todo ** Also affects: soft

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925833] Re: apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing

2021-04-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This has been fixed in 2.1.15 and newer versions, so starting with hirsute. As the change is too invasive, it has not been backported to older releases. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925833] Re: apt-transport-https reparses URLs, breaking CloudFront signing

2021-04-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
WRT your other comment: apt-transport-https is a binary package, launchpad bugs are against source packages. Also apt-transport-https is an empty transitional package, there is no separate https method anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926150] [NEW] [SRU] Backport JSON hooks 0.2

2021-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] We want to be able to use JSON hooks 0.2 in xenial and later releases to display messages to users during dist-upgrade. For xenial, we backport the JSON hook support in its entirety, whereas for later releases, we only need to cherry-pick bugfixes and the v0.2 impro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926150] Re: [SRU] Backport JSON hooks 0.2

2021-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
These changes are in apt 2.3.2 which is queued for impish. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926150 Title: [SRU] Backport JSON hooks 0.2 Status in apt package i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1876035] Re: Automatically retry downloads on failures

2021-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The basic "turn the flag on" is landing in 2.3.2, I'll open other bug reports for the backoff and server switching things I suppose. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-26 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Aside from the code being wrong - it's missing an apt_pkg.init_config(), it also does not work with the config being setup; it needs to be whitelisted. So we definitely need to SRU APT. However, we are already preparing 1.2.35 at the moment for ESM enablement, I don't know if we want to stuff both

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Split out APT / python-apt into bug 1923845 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923845 Title: Please compress packages with zstd by default Status in appstream-gl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] [NEW] [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-04-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] APT in xenial needs to learn about zstd support to enable Launchpad to work with zstd packages. python-apt in all releases needs to be adjusted to pass the compressor names instead of programs to ExtractTar, as otherwise, if /usr/bin/zstd does not exist, it will pas

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others

2021-04-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yes, see the tasks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921626 Title: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others Status in apt package i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] APT in xenial needs to learn about zstd support to enable Launchpad to work with zstd packages. python-apt in all releases needs to be adjusted to pass the compressor names instead of programs to ExtractTar, as otherwise, if /usr/bin/zstd does not exi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
OK, so what's going on is that ubuntu-release-upgrader-gtk is not installed, and apt only updates phasing to upgrades, but not new installs. Which fails in this case. Presumably it needs to apply phasing to all packages in a source package if one of them is installed, but that might be slow :( --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Or we phase _everything_. Also makes code faster ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926150] Re: [SRU] Backport JSON hooks 0.2

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926150

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt have passed. I've build a patched version of python-apt and verified that it worked with the apt version, so the apt side is verified now :D ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial -- You recei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-04-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
FWIW, I upgraded python-apt to the version in xenial-proposed Unpacking python3-apt (1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.12) over (1.1.0~beta1ubuntu0.16.04.11) ... And verified that the script import apt_inst, apt_pkg apt_pkg.init() apt_inst.DebFile("glibc-doc-reference_2.33-0ubuntu2~zstd1_all.deb").contro

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926964] Re: missing libapt-pkg4.12 dependency

2021-05-03 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Steve Langasek (vorlon) ** Package changed: python-apt (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1927078] Re: Don't allow useradd to use fully numeric names

2021-05-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Maybe it should be a warning in the SRUs as opposed to a failure, but I don't have a strong opinion. I'm a bit scared of breaking scripts. But maybe that's a good thing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to shadow i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923464] Re: ideally should boot rootfs from a matching hard drive

2021-05-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Just to not forget: This should work. We pass the ESP/boot partition to kernel, initramfs then looks at it, and if it finds UUID on same drive, it will take that one. If not it will take UUID from any drive, thus handling RAID or encryption automagically. -- You received this bug notification bec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926437] Re: [SRU] Backport zstd support, fix bug in python-apt

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The xenial SRU should be good to go now, the snapcraft failures are unrelated and also reproduced in vorlon's retry of snapcraft itself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928088] [NEW] Empty pockets don't end up in the cache - E: The value 'hirsute-backports' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] If a pocket is empty, apt will not download the empty packages files, causing the repository to not be added to the cache. This in turn breaks commands such as using apt install -t hirsute-backports as apt is unable to find the release in the archive. [Test plan]

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928100] [NEW] TLS handshake is fatal, not transient - hence not retried

2021-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] TLS handshakes are reported as fatal errors rather than transient errors like other connection errors on unencrypted connections. This seems wrong - a server may just be spinning up or down and fail during the handshake, and prevents retrying such downloads [Test

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928687] [NEW] Avoid infinite loop on EOF on media change prompt

2021-05-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] The cdrom media change prompt hangs on EOF. This causes the autopkgtest to hang when run in a debian lxd container for unknown reasons related to lxd/systemd isolation likely (it works fine in Ubuntu), but it's also surprising behavior in general. [Test plan] We d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928687] Re: Avoid infinite loop on EOF on media change prompt

2021-05-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Impish) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925745 Title: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-deskt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1886161] Re: Unattended upgrades should work on roaming laptops

2021-05-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@Robin You should be able to just run `systemctl start apt-daily.service apt-daily-upgrade.service` from the hook. This will start those two services - which run update / upgrade - in the same transaction, and hence ordering will work correctly. The timer will still run again, so it's not _optimal

[Touch-packages] [Bug 978587] Re: apt should ensure .deb are not corrupted before handing them to dpkg

2021-05-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/978587 Title: apt should ensure .deb are not corrupted before ha

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1930584] Re: InstallProgress is not being used as a context manager

2021-06-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I kind of don't need the bug in both places. I'd suggest to go fix your backend to pass an install progress and use a with statement, that we don't use one inside apt.cache was intentional. This means it produces warnings if you don't pass one, but frankly, that's bad practice. ** Changed in: pyt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931178] Re: apt-key fails when POSIXLY_CORRECT environmental variable is set

2021-06-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Is this a regression from an older release? We can fix it, but if it's not a regression, I'd just skip it, as running apt-key is the wrong approach anyway. They should just pmrum cp some-repo-key.gpg /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d. optimally drop the keyring elsewhere and use signed-by in sources.list sni

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-06-10 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923845 Title: Please compress packages with zstd by default Sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931874] [NEW] Failure to download packages with epochs (Regression from 2.1.15)

2021-06-14 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: [Impact] Packages where the epoch is encoded in the filename cannot be retrieved, as we overlooked some places when changing the acquire system to always use % encoded URLs. [Test plan] A test is included in the comprehensive test suite. [Where problems could occur] Regres

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928100] Re: TLS handshake is fatal, not transient - hence not retried

2021-06-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928100 Title: TLS handshake is fatal, not tra

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others

2021-06-15 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: [Impact] Downloads fail if: - there is at least one package each with Size and no size on a mirror - a package without a Size field is larger than a package with a Size field that's currently in the pipeline Also, this was silent, we need to add an error

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-06-17 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Description changed: + [Impact] + Phased upgrades were only applied to already installed packages, so if we had a source package foo building foo-core and foo-extra, and foo-core=1 was installed, and we tried to install foo-extra, it would fail because it would try to install 0% foo-extra=2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-06-18 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This caused a regression in autopkgtest, causing the ubuntu-advantage- tools failure. We'll have to SRU an autopkgtest that sets always- include-phased-updates as in https://salsa.debian.org/ci- team/autopkgtest/-/merge_requests/125 ** Tags added: block-proposed-hirsute -- You received this bug

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928687] Re: Avoid infinite loop on EOF on media change prompt

2021-06-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I've not been able to reproduce this recently, there seems to be a race in the cdrom testing code somewhere and I've not been lucky to trigger it; but we saw no regressions in the test suite, and the fix is one of the obvious correct ones, so marking as verified. ** Tags removed: verification-need

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1926150] Re: [SRU] Backport JSON hooks 0.2

2021-06-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt itself have passed, verifying the fix. We still battle with one apport regression on focal, but it seems unrelated - they've failed before. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: ver

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1921626] Re: size mismatch error if request of unknown size is larger than others

2021-06-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtests for apt itself have passed, verifying the fix. We still battle with one apport regression on focal, but it seems unrelated - they've failed before. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done verification-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1928100] Re: TLS handshake is fatal, not transient - hence not retried

2021-06-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtest have passed, so verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1931874] Re: Failure to download packages with epochs (Regression from 2.1.15)

2021-06-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
verified by autopkgtests ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-06-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
We do not have any updates phasing in hirsute atm, so will have to hack in one :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925745 Title: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-06-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
focal/2.0.6: The standalone test certainly worked, and the keyboard interrupts were delivered to do-release-upgrade ** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal ** Tags added: verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1898026] Re: interruption of dist-upgrade can leave you next release in sources.list

2021-06-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
bionic, 1.6.14 is good too. root@b:~# python3 a.py WAITING ^C root@b:~# apt install libapt-pkg5.0 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required: libfreetype6 Use 'apt aut

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-06-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Verification done. First I downgraded all systemd packages to the release pocket using # apt install '?installed?version(247.3-3ubuntu3.1$)=247.3-3ubuntu3' Then I hacked in Phased-Update-Percentage: 0 fields for all src:systemd packages in my local hirsute-updates Packages file in /var/lib/apt/l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1933674] Re: gaixinhsg

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1933674 Title: gaixinhsg Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Invalid

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1562733] Re: apt signature requirements prevent updates from some repositories

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1562733 Title: apt signature requirements prevent updates

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1481871] Re: apt-key del silently fails to delete keys due to limited understanding of GPG key ID formats

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Currently apt-key del can be called with a given key to remove it w/o having to check if it's in the database. Reporting an error would likely break existing packages. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1134492] Re: xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I think this bug is obsolete now, so closing ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-12.04.3 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 325700] Re: apt-key has unannounced dependency on wget

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
net-update has not been supported since 16.04, so this is somewhat resolved :D ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1309658] Re: apt.conf man page should indicate # is also used for comments

2021-06-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks, @okay19, I have applied your patch in apt git. Sorry it took 5 1/2 years. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923464] Re: ideally should boot rootfs from a matching hard drive

2021-06-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
that's for systemd-boot, but oh well, nothing uses that in Ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923464 Title: ideally should boot rootfs from a matching

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1925745] Re: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies

2021-06-30 Thread Julian Andres Klode
autopkgtest SRUs are in bug 1934100 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925745 Title: Hirsute: Cannot install ubuntu-desktop due to unmet dependencies Status in a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965121] Re: "archive.ubuntu.com" was missing in "/etc/apt/sources.list"

2022-03-16 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks for your bug report. I am reassigning this to the installer, but it seems more likely that this is a result of user error, given that there have not been any relevant changes in focal's installer. For user support, please use askubuntu, discourse, the ubuntu-user mailing lists, or the #ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1965960] Re: apt installs snap packages

2022-03-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965960 Title: apt installs snap packages Status in apt package in Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962036] Re: dbus was stopped during today's jammy update, breaking desktop

2022-04-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-22.04 ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Also affects: dbus (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Critical Status: Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch se

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1962036] Re: dbus was stopped during today's jammy update, breaking desktop

2022-04-01 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Tags added: fr-2162 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962036 Title: dbus was stopped during today's jammy update, breaking desktop Status in dbus package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968135] Re: BTRFS root subvolume @ mounted always as readonly (... ro rootflags=subvol=@ ...) on Jammy beta

2022-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The ro flag is correct, the / filesystem is remounted rw after a filesystem check, I don't know where precisely, I'm gonna reassign this to systemd ** Package changed: grub2 (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] [NEW] Only keep 2 kernels

2022-04-07 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank) Status: In Progress ** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: fr-2155 ** Description changed: [Impact] APT currently keeps 3 kernels or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
unattended-upgrades in jammy did not need a change, we'll see if SRUs will need changes, hence keeping the task so we can add them later on without having to reset to launchpad API shenanigans. ** Description changed: [Impact] APT currently keeps 3 kernels or even 4 in some releases. Our boot

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968461] Re: sudo apt install crashes computer

2022-04-19 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Not an apt bug in either case if it crashes your system ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-04-22 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Impish) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-04-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@sil2100 Added that to regression potential. It was used to keep the third kernel. There was some misunderstanding how that affects the set calculated. I noticed that 2.0.7 and 2.3.9ubuntu0.1 had the wrong version in maintainer scripts, so I will have to upload a fixed 2.0.8 for the former (it has

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1964483] Re: Update supported mirror protocol according to official archive mirrors list

2022-05-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1814072 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814072 charite did not support https at the time the mirror list in python-apt was created. The mirror list is updated with each python-apt update, and with each Ubuntu point release. With the next update, only ht

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814072] Re: software-properties-gtk does not recognize https mirrors under Ubuntu Software

2022-05-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814072 Title: software-properti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1814072] Re: software-properties-gtk does not recognize https mirrors under Ubuntu Software

2022-05-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The mirror list is shipped in python-apt and updated with each python- apt update, and with each Ubuntu point release based on the launchpad mirror feed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archivemirrors-rss. Additional updates to just the mirror list are not made. The mirror method is supported using

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1971763] Re: www-browser is not satisfied by the default Firefox snap

2022-05-06 Thread Julian Andres Klode
The gimp-help-* packages have a dependency on only virtual packages rather than firefox-esr | firefox | chromium | x-www-browser or something which is a bug. as it will pick a random one. Also I'm not sure why it would depend on the non-graphical browser virtual package (www-browser) instead o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Impish) ** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal) ** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic) ** No longer affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) ** Description changed: [Impact] APT currently keeps 3 kernels or

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-05-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Verified impish 2.3.9ubuntu0.1 Log: 1. (in 1016) started with 5.13.0-1016-kvm; installed 5.13.0-1022-kvm 2. (in 1016) no kernels to autoremove 3. (in 1016) installed linux-image-5.13.0-1011-kvm linux-modules-5.13.0-1011-kvm, and marked auto 4. (in 1016) SUCCESS: autoremove would remove 1011 5. (i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973149] Re: system uses merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs, going behind dpkg's back, breaking its core assumptions

2022-05-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I thought we patched that warning out. Do not read it :D Notably this is the only supported layout. ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Triaged -- Yo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1973149] Re: system uses merged-usr-via-aliased-dirs, going behind dpkg's back, breaking its core assumptions

2022-05-12 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Also you probably don't want to run devel proposed, that's a recipe for disaster. ** Tags added: rls-kk-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973149 Titl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974223] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure since changes in apt for automatic kernel removal

2022-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
looking ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974223] Re: FTBFS and autopkgtest failure since changes in apt for automatic kernel removal

2022-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I ran the tests in lxd, I'm not sure that's sufficient, but: on bionic: upgrade-all-security FAIL non-zero exit status 1 focal failed to build for me in autopkgtest: 2022-05-20 10:04:12,150 ERROR Exception happened during upgrade. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/tmp/autopkgtest.7B08

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1968154] Re: Only keep 2 kernels

2022-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please create a new bug for that regression, thanks for noticing! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968154 Title: Only keep 2 kernels Status in apt package in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974456] Re: regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

2022-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974456] Re: regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

2022-05-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Yup I'm going to push updated bionic and focal SRUs for this next week -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456 Title: regression: apt.postint fails if never pre

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974456] Re: regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

2022-05-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
@David I was able to reproduce this with mmdebstrap as it uses -updates pocket, but not with debootstrap as it only uses the release pockets. Which tool were you using to bootstrap your system? It's possible we might just want keep the fix in -proposed and not release it to updates if it does not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1974456] Re: regression: apt.postint fails if never previously configured

2022-05-23 Thread Julian Andres Klode
It might, I just might miss the right setting, I don't really know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974456 Title: regression: apt.postint fails if never previo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1954534] Re: package left in uninstallable state, due to "phased 20%"

2021-12-11 Thread Julian Andres Klode
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1929082 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929082 Thanks for the bug report. Please ignore Chris. This is not a bug in apt. Launchpad currently does not preserve an old version when a new one is phasing, so non-installability can happen occasionally. For

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955859] Re: ubuntu-base on jammy daily: apt-key has no access to /dev/null

2021-12-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Thanks for your bug report. I believe you meant ubuntu-base, not ubuntu- core (the snap based one) How did you test this? This seems to me like you forgot to populate /dev, either statically or by bind mounting the /dev from the host. The tarball only contains an empty /dev, and the permissions h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955859] Re: ubuntu-base on jammy daily: apt-key has no access to /dev/null

2021-12-28 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I believe this is actually a bug in the QA website which misses the step to setup /dev in the test scenario https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/testcases/1318/info - so reassigning there and marking the apt task as Invalid, but keeping it around rather than deleting it, as it's related. ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2021-12-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This broke the autopkgtest cloud. Networking did not came up and hence no tests passed anymore. We absolutely must not let this pass until we are sure the problem is resolved, as rebuilding images without it is hard. (so setting it to incomplete is fairly dangerous). Debian does not use cloud-init

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2021-12-29 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I think we can rebuild images on the staging autopkgtest instance with the packages from proposed and run a couple hundred tests there and see if it still breaks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1956275] Re: apt autoremove uninstalls nvidia graphics card drivers

2022-01-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Hi, thanks for your bug report. I'm not quite sure what you are experiencing here, you likely have manually removed a package that depended on the drivers and then caused them to become autoremovable. Though usually I'd have expected the drivers to be installed manually. We are going to need to s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2022-01-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I don't believe your reproducer is valid - cloud-init is not installed anymore, as autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud removes it when building the VM, whereas it remains on the cloud images, as it's needed there to actually get the IP address during boot. Removing the DefaultDependencies=no means th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2022-01-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
I have added a cloud-init task, to draw cloud-init people in to help get this resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950039 Title: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2022-01-04 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Though arguably I'd expect this to be fixed by removing DefaultDependencies again, if I looked at this correctly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ufw in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950039 Title:

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1950039] Re: ufw 0.36.1-3 introduces ordering cycle, breaking network

2022-01-05 Thread Julian Andres Klode
> cloud-init shouldn't care cause the ufw service doesn't do anything unless ufw is enabled (and even when it is enabled, it just loads firewall rules). It doesn't care about ufw at all, systemd has noticed a cycle between the units and deleted network-pre.target start job (or cloud-init in #1), c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1955489] Re: Patch to polkit policy breaks automatic/unattended updates

2022-01-13 Thread Julian Andres Klode
This probably should be reassigned to the kde settings package. The way we approach upgrades in *Ubuntu is that they are done online and attended, except for security updates, which are installed automatically by unattended-upgrades. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668944] Re: The _apt user ignores group membership.

2022-01-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Subscribing ubuntu-security as I'd like to hear some insight from the security team how switching groups would work when sandboxing, and whether that makes sense. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1668944] Re: The _apt user ignores group membership.

2022-01-20 Thread Julian Andres Klode
You can of course use ACLs to grant permissions to _apt to individual files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1668944 Title: The _apt user ignores group membersh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958642] [NEW] New 2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 Produces RWE load header on s390x

2022-01-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Public bug reported: Building libxcrypt with the new binutils upload 2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 in proposed produces binaries with one RWE LOAD header instead of two LOAD headers (one RE, one RW); causing it to fail to load in services that use MemoryDenyWriteExecute=yes, thus breaking a ton of sys

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958642] Re: New 2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 Produces RWE load header on s390x

2022-01-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Technically this was critical while it was in proposed, I set it to high as we removed it; but it's a blocker to fix this for a future binutils upload. ** Tags added: rls-jj-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscrib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958642] Re: New 2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 Produces RWE load header on s390x

2022-01-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Further data points: - The first build with new binutils was s390x build of soci 4.0.1-5ubuntu1 in ubuntu jammy PROPOSED - Investigation on Debian shows that it was not affected, and that the bug is caused by LTO - if you enable LTO on Debian, it starts building the broken library as well. --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958812] Re: If apt installs snap package, then warn, because maybe i dont want snap package.

2022-01-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958812 Title: If apt installs snap package, then warn, because mayb

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958811] Re: If apt installs snap package, then show size of it

2022-01-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Arguably people could hack in an override for Installed-Size when building the deb somehow to give a rough estimate, but might not be worth the effort. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Won't Fix => Invalid -- You received thi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958810] Re: Apt installing snap package if got some error why didnt finish, thinks apt is installed, but snap cant be removed

2022-01-24 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958810 Title: Apt installing snap package if got some error why didnt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1958642] Re: New 2.37.50.20220119-0ubuntu1 Produces RWE load header on s390x

2022-01-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1004272 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004272 ** Also affects: binutils (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004272 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification bec

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959748] Re: package information could not be initialized

2022-02-02 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Please sudo chmod 644 /var/lib/apt/lists/de.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_focal- backports_InRelease to fix this. If you can reproduce this reliably, please let me know. Otherwise, there's nothing we can do to fix the underlying bug, as we can't analyse it further, so I'm going to be closing the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >