he somehow missed the group box out, so i've sent it on.
however, from this he doesn't seem to understand android is only one of
it's operating systems, and was a later addition, not it's sole reason
for existing.
scsijon
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [Toybox] Toybox Instal
sed was an example I gave, not a direct command.
On 03/09/19 07:58, Rob Landley wrote:
On 9/1/19 8:47 PM, Denys Nykula wrote:
Which is where we come back to the question, what and how are others
dealing with this problem and is there a need for a simple and basic
installer inside toybox?
In g
> > which awk 2>&1 >/dev/null || ln -fsv nawk /bin/awk
> > which vi 2>&1 >/dev/null || ln -fsv vim /bin/vi
>
> Those last two are on the todo list. But after toysh and route, which mkroot
> needs. (And vi might be after make, and promoting half the stuff currently in
> pending.)
Implementing sh a
On 9/2/19 4:19 PM, enh wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 6:18 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> (as an aside, i still haven't understood \c. i've never seen it used
> in practice, and the examples i've seen are all of the form "x\cy"
> which would be better written as just "x".)
I think it's so echo "$ONE$TW
On 03/09/19 07:50, Rob Landley wrote:
On 9/1/19 6:22 PM, scsijon wrote:
This may be a can of worms or off-topic but...
I was wondering if Toybox should/could have an inbuilt installer/setup routine
of some sort and how are others handling this retro-fit problem!
"When I download toybox as
On 9/1/19 8:47 PM, Denys Nykula wrote:
>> Which is where we come back to the question, what and how are others
>> dealing with this problem and is there a need for a simple and basic
>> installer inside toybox?
>
> In gentoo I have this /etc/portage/bashrc hook symlink toybox to every
> command
On 9/1/19 6:22 PM, scsijon wrote:
> This may be a can of worms or off-topic but...
>
> I was wondering if Toybox should/could have an inbuilt installer/setup routine
> of some sort and how are others handling this retro-fit problem!
"When I download toybox as a normal user, it doesn't run as ro
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 6:18 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 8/31/19 11:31 PM, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > I think when I wrote this I tested the named escapes like \n and hex
> > escapes, and when I found \x wasn't supported I didn't even think of
> > octal. And I only learned about \c when I was looki
