ping?
On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 8:48 AM enh wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:52 PM Rob Landley wrote:
> >
> > On 7/26/24 07:13, enh via Toybox wrote:
> > >> Don't know Rob cares about this, but ?: is not ISO C. It's a GNU
> > >> extension.
> >
> > Specifically https://gcc.gnu.org/onl
ping?
On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 7:52 PM Rob Landley wrote:
>
> On 7/26/24 07:13, enh via Toybox wrote:
> >> Don't know Rob cares about this, but ?: is not ISO C. It's a GNU
> >> extension.
>
> Specifically https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Conditionals.html
>
> > with 80 existing uses o
On 7/26/24 07:13, enh via Toybox wrote:
>> Don't know Rob cares about this, but ?: is not ISO C. It's a GNU
>> extension.
Specifically https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Conditionals.html
> with 80 existing uses of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_operator
> in toybox, i'm pretty su
with 80 existing uses of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elvis_operator
in toybox, i'm pretty sure rob knows this already :-)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:01 PM Ivo van Poorten wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:17:51 -0400 enh via Toybox
> wrote:
> > +fd = xopen(TT.f ?: "/dev/mem", (writing ? O_R
On Thu, 25 Jul 2024 14:17:51 -0400 enh via Toybox
wrote:
> +fd = xopen(TT.f ?: "/dev/mem", (writing ? O_RDWR : O_RDONLY) |
> O_SYNC);
Don't know Rob cares about this, but ?: is not ISO C. It's a GNU
extension. Up until a few minutes ago I didn't even know this existed :)
Would be nice if this
-f lets people use /dev/port for x86 i/o ports (rather than needing a
separate x86-only command), or /dev/nvram, or /dev/cpu/*/msr, or
/sys/bus/pci/devices/*:*:*.* ... you get the idea.
It also means we can write some tests. (Though of course, the tests
don't tell us whether this actually works wi
