On Jan 11, 12:29 am, "Jevgenijs Rogovs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am running Trac 0.10.4 on RH Enterprise Release 3 (kernel 2.4.20-8) with
> Apache HTTPD 2.0.54, Python 2.5.1, mod_python 3.3.1. All debug stuff and
> logging is off, python/mod_python are built with shared l
> Yes. Nobody's figured out how to beat the kiss principle yet, and whether
> today's focus is on energy consumption, maintenance costs, or whatever, it
> always tends to boil down to that in the end.
I don't share the same opinion, but as this thread as really evolved
OOT, let's close it ;-)
Ch
Does anybody has some directions on how to make
http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/PeerReviewPlugin run on 0.11?
Alternatively directions to another Code Review plugin that runs on 0.11 would
be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
Christian Petersen
--~--~-~--~~-
On Thursday 10 January 2008 10:54:26 Emmanuel Blot wrote:
> Sorry I quoted the wrong line, my answer was about raw access to the
> DB layer
Yeah, I kinda figured. I did put a disclaimer on that, plus OP sounded smart
enough to understand about reaching into storage tier directly and
bypassing "
Sorry I quoted the wrong line, my answer was about raw access to the
DB layer, anyway:
> OP specifically stated he didn't want to use existing python API.
My answer was about using another language, ie. similar API, not
related to Python - I was quoting PERL, for example.
No need to learn Python
Emmanuel Blot wrote:
>> Errm... why bother, can't you just post newticket with e.g. curl?
>
> Maintenance, robustness, and many other reasons that make APIs exist ;-)
OP specifically stated he didn't want to use existing python API. My
comment was about wrapping RPC call in XML and sending it o
DUH--Thank you. That is the only one that doesn't have a repository
yet, I just hadn't checked. Once again thank you...Ed
On Jan 9, 7:50 pm, Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> etc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > 1. I select Admin
> > 2. Then I select the "Permissions" link
> > 3. This s
Hello everyone,
I am running Trac 0.10.4 on RH Enterprise Release 3 (kernel 2.4.20-8) with
Apache HTTPD 2.0.54, Python 2.5.1, mod_python 3.3.1. All debug stuff and
logging is off, python/mod_python are built with shared libraries. Database
backend is SQLite.
Is there anything I can do to improve
-On [20080110 11:25], Lars Stavholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>...but not...
>
>% pydoc trac.ticket
>% pydoc trac.ticket.api
That's odd. I just tested it on my FreeBSD box with both 2.4 and 2.5 and I can
pydoc those two module specifications without any hickups.
--
Jeroe
I'm interested, too!
it-novum GmbH
Ein Unternehmen der Mehler AG
Christian Mies
Consultant Systemmanagement
Edelzeller Stra?e 44
36043 Fulda
FON:+49 (661) 103-874 (-333)
FAX:+49 (661) 103-17874(-334)
MAIL: [EMAIL PROTEC
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080110 08:22], Lars Stavholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Right so, good advice. While we're on the subject:
>> I'm using 0.10.4 and I get:
>>
>> % pydoc trac.ticket.api
>
> pydoc unittest.TestSuite
>
> Errm... why bother, can't you just post newticket with e.g. curl?
Maintenance, robustness, and many other reasons that make APIs exist ;-)
Cheers,
Manu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac
Users"
-On [20080110 08:22], Lars Stavholm ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Right so, good advice. While we're on the subject:
>I'm using 0.10.4 and I get:
>
>% pydoc trac.ticket.api
pydoc unittest.TestSuite
works as expected? (Just want to make sure whether it is pydoc or trac
13 matches
Mail list logo