On 17/12/08 16:41, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hi!,
As a heads up, all the suggestions that could affect tracker module
developers are already implemented in trunk, if you compile tracker with
--enable-gtk-doc, you'll see the docs in:
tracker/docs/reference/libtracker-module/html/index.html
I've al
Hi!,
As a heads up, all the suggestions that could affect tracker module
developers are already implemented in trunk, if you compile tracker with
--enable-gtk-doc, you'll see the docs in:
tracker/docs/reference/libtracker-module/html/index.html
I've also developed a new version for a sample dum
On 17/12/08 10:48, Ivan Frade wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to Bastien Nocera, we have a patch to compile with gmime2.4 in
the bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564640
The question is: in the next release of tracker should we use gmime-2.0
or gmime-2.4?
Some points to take into ac
El mié, 17-12-2008 a las 12:23 +0100, ext Michael Biebl escribió:
> 2008/12/17 Ivan Frade :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks to Bastien Nocera, we have a patch to compile with gmime2.4 in
> > the bugzilla:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564640
> >
> > The question is: in the next release
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:34 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> This patch makes ultra-new Evolution installs work again with Tracker.
>
> There's one problem and that is that the query will only find E-mails in
> the INBOX folder. You can easily find the Query and figure out what the
> problem is:
>
2008/12/17 Ivan Frade :
> Hi,
>
> Thanks to Bastien Nocera, we have a patch to compile with gmime2.4 in
> the bugzilla:
>
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564640
>
> The question is: in the next release of tracker should we use gmime-2.0
> or gmime-2.4?
>
> Some points to take into ac
Hi,
Thanks to Bastien Nocera, we have a patch to compile with gmime2.4 in
the bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564640
The question is: in the next release of tracker should we use gmime-2.0
or gmime-2.4?
Some points to take into account:
* To do it "optional" looks like a
On 17/12/08 08:10, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Are these troubles fixed?
I suspect this is related to the escaping issues we have. If we receive
'\n' then memory is cleaned up the indexer's side. So if you still have
information to send on the extractor's side, it might do something
unexpect
Are these troubles fixed?
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:21 PM, wrote:
> Selon Carlos Garnacho :
>
>> Hi Laurent!,
>
> Hi Carlos!
>
>> On miÃ(c), 2008-10-22 at 23:33 +0200, Laurent Aguerreche wrote:
>> > hello,
>> >
>> > my daily bug report is today about random SIGPIPEs with tracker-indexer.
>> > U
