> >
> > I would rather we increase the memory usage permitted rather than
> > risk flames of tracker making their system unusable.
>
> We already have this with the current solution. Right now people are
> already saying they get too many crashes and they are disabling indexing
> or removing Tr
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
I am not entirely sure setting a memory limit helps. Right now it
masks the problem with SIGSEGV and we just get a lot of those. I
would much rather someone got their data indexed and then
complained about memory usa
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 15:18 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:47 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent a lot of time this week
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:47 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:47 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Jamie McCracken wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
> >> and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we use
Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we use. I haven't seen
exactly how, but we did some light testing here by not using
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 09:02 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
> Also memory usage can rocket especially with video files
>
> It might be a case we extend the time permitted for the extractor to
> finish so that slower machines are not penalised but I would object to
> removing this safety net
I expe
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:09 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have spent a lot of time this week triaging bug reports in Launchpad
> and I noticed ubuntu patches the setrlimit() call we use. I haven't seen
> exactly how, but we did some light testing here by not using it at all,
> an
