Hi.
I've been working in a patch to be able to run Tracker 0.7 in
N900/Fremantle.
Attached is the set of patches that make this possible. The good news
about them is that allow that Tracker 0.7 runs together with default
tracker (0.6.x). Thus, applications can still use tracker 0.6 and newers
can
2009/11/20 Juan A. Suarez Romero :
> Hi.
>
> I've been working in a patch to be able to run Tracker 0.7 in
> N900/Fremantle.
>
> Attached is the set of patches that make this possible. The good news
> about them is that allow that Tracker 0.7 runs together with default
> tracker (0.6.x). Thus, appl
One immediate big remark with the patches is that you are silently
trying to lower the version requirements for sqlite.
Don't
I guess the renaming of these files is a team decision that I can't make
on my own, so I can't push these patches right now.
We'll discuss this, though.
On Fri, 2009-11-
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> One immediate big remark with the patches is that you are silently
> trying to lower the version requirements for sqlite.
>
> Don't
Yes, I did it because in Fremantle, sqlite is 3.6.14.
There's a comment in code telling that 3.6.16 is
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 08:03 -0600, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I don't agree unfortunately.
> Honestly, I don't think it makes an awful lot of sense to run two
> indexers at the same time and having new binary names at each new
> major revision (-0.6, -0.7, ...) also brings it's shares of problems,
> li
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I guess the renaming of these files is a team decision that I can't
> make
> on my own, so I can't push these patches right now.
Push where? :)
As I said, the patches are not intended to be pushed in any existent
branch. Rather, I'd crea
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:08 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > I guess the renaming of these files is a team decision that I can't
> > make
> > on my own, so I can't push these patches right now.
>
> Push where? :)
>
> As I said, th
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:47 +0100, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > One immediate big remark with the patches is that you are silently
> > trying to lower the version requirements for sqlite.
> >
> > Don't
>
> Yes, I did it because in Fr
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> While it is imho useful, if you can install libraries and headers in
> parallel, so e.g. developers can more easily port applications to
> newer version, I don't really see the use case for having two indexers
> installed at t
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:36 +0100, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> I think a unit-test failed with 3.6.14 and didn't fail with 3.6.16
> indicating a bug in sqlite 3.6.14 that affects us.
>
Ah. Good to know. I thought the reason was other.
Fair enough.
Attached you can find the patches, this time with
On 20/11/09 18:47, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
Hi.
Hi,
I've been working in a patch to be able to run Tracker 0.7 in
N900/Fremantle.
Nice!
Attached is the set of patches that make this possible. The good news
about them is that allow that Tracker 0.7 runs together with default
tracker (0
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:52 +0800, Martyn Russell wrote:
> You do know that tracker-search replaces tracker-files right? Also
> tracker-sparql pretty much replaces tracker-query and tracker-files too
> AND does everything that tracker-search now does (tracker-search being a
> convenience for tra
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 09:52 +0800, Martyn Russell wrote:
> Well, I think Michael said it already, but 0.6 and 0.7 are meant to
> co-exist for developers ONLY not for real use together.
As discussed in the team, we intend to keep it like that, i.e., only
support/facilitate parallel installation fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
