[Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes tracker's thumbnail support follow the fd.o spec. It uses the $HOME/.thumbnails directory, so it'll work along side nautilus, thundar, and konq. It will not overwrite up-to-date thumbnails, but the File.SmallThumbnailPath meta

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Edward Duffy wrote: > I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes > tracker's thumbnail support follow the fd.o spec. It uses the > $HOME/.thumbnails directory, so it'll work along side nautilus, > thundar, and konq. It will not overwrite up-to-date thumbnails, but > the

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:57 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: > Edward Duffy wrote: > > I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes > > tracker's thumbnail support follow the fd.o spec. It uses the > > $HOME/.thumbnails directory, so it'll work along side nautilus, > > thunda

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Jon Phillips wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:57 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: > >> Edward Duffy wrote: >> >>> I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes >>> tracker's thumbnail support follow the fd.o spec. It uses the >>> $HOME/.thumbnails directory, so it'l

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Erlend Davidson wrote: > > Jon Phillips wrote: >> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:57 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: >> >>> Edward Duffy wrote: >>> I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes tracker's thumbnail support follow the fd.o spec. It uses the $HO

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Jamie McCracken wrote: > Erlend Davidson wrote: > >> Jon Phillips wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 18:57 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: >>> >>> Edward Duffy wrote: > I know this isn't a high priority item, but here's a patch that makes > tra

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Erlend Davidson wrote: > That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar ones > take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, output file > and optionally the URI of the file), this should be sufficient, but > someone might want more and then the standard would

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 14:58 +, Jamie McCracken wrote: > Erlend Davidson wrote: > > > That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar ones > > take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, output file > > and optionally the URI of the file), this should be su

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Jamie McCracken wrote: > Erlend Davidson wrote: > >> That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar >> ones take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, >> output file and optionally the URI of the file), this should be >> sufficient, but someone might want

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Erlend Davidson wrote: > > Jamie McCracken wrote: >> Erlend Davidson wrote: >> >>> That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar >>> ones take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, >>> output file and optionally the URI of the file), this should be >>> suf

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Jamie McCracken wrote: > Erlend Davidson wrote: >> >> Jamie McCracken wrote: >>> Erlend Davidson wrote: >>> That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar ones take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, output file and optionally the URI of t

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

shouldn't be hard at all. is there a location where all the keys are documented? On 1/8/07, Erlend Davidson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Jamie McCracken wrote: > > Erlend Davidson wrote: > >> > >> Jamie McCracken wrote: > >>> Erlend Davidson wrote: > >>> > That would require a whole stan

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Erlend Davidson wrote: > > Jamie McCracken wrote: >> Erlend Davidson wrote: >>> Jamie McCracken wrote: Erlend Davidson wrote: > That would require a whole standard for thumbnailers... the thunar > ones take three or four command-line arguments (input file, size, > output fi

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Ok. Here's a patch to tracker-thumbnailer to 1) Remove the old style /path/to/mime/type_thumbnailer 2) Support the Thundar style .desktop file 3) If ^ fails, try gconf's /desktop/gnome/thumbnailers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/command key 4) Add .desktop thumbnailers for OO.o, Dia, pdf, and ps (all

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Edward Duffy wrote: > Ok. Here's a patch to tracker-thumbnailer to > 1) Remove the old style /path/to/mime/type_thumbnailer > 2) Support the Thundar style .desktop file > 3) If ^ fails, try gconf's > /desktop/gnome/thumbnailers/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/command key > 4) Add .desktop thumbnailers f

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

On 1/13/07, Jamie McCracken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Edward Duffy wrote: > > Ok. Here's a patch to tracker-thumbnailer to > > 1) Remove the old style /path/to/mime/type_thumbnailer > > 2) Support the Thundar style .desktop file > > 3) If ^ fails, try gconf's > > /desktop/gnome/thumbnail

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

On 14 Jan 2007, at 00:22, Jamie McCracken wrote: > a few snags: > > 1) do a svn update - bits of quite old code are in your patch > > 2) I dont like the fact that we are parsing desktop files and > checking gconf every time the thumbnailer is called. Thunar caches the thumbnailers in a binary f

Re: [Tracker] fd.o compliant thumbnailing

Edward Duffy wrote: > a few snags: >> >> 1) do a svn update - bits of quite old code are in your patch > damn.. 20 revisions off. >> >> 2) I dont like the fact that we are parsing desktop files and checking >> gconf every time the thumbnailer is called. >> > me neither...I was hoping to find some s