Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-02-05 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > On jue, 2009-02-05 at 11:24 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> 2009/2/5 Martyn Russell : >> > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> >>> What I meant was the RES column in top, just to be clear. >> >>> >> >>> I anyways ran $ valgrind --leak-chec

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-02-05 Thread Carlos Garnacho
On jue, 2009-02-05 at 11:24 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > 2009/2/5 Martyn Russell : > > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > >>> What I meant was the RES column in top, just to be clear. > >>> > >>> I anyways ran $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes > >>> --leak-resolution=high -v /usr

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-02-05 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
2009/2/5 Martyn Russell : > Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >>> What I meant was the RES column in top, just to be clear. >>> >>> I anyways ran $ valgrind --leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes >>> --leak-resolution=high -v /usr/libexec/trackerd >>> >>> and go the following output, and I don't know wha

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-02-05 Thread Martyn Russell
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: ping 2009/1/23 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe : On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 14:41 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekho

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-02-04 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
ping 2009/1/23 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe : > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 14:41 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: >>> > On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >>> >

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-01-23 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 14:41 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: >> > On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> README champions the daemon

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-01-23 Thread Philip Van Hoof
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 14:41 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > > On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> README champions the daemon as memory efficient (3-30MB RAM) and I'd > >> like to send a pa

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-01-23 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> README champions the daemon as memory efficient (3-30MB RAM) and I'd >> like to send a patch that removes the whole paragraph since that's no >> longer the case. >>

Re: [Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-01-23 Thread Carlos Garnacho
On vie, 2009-01-23 at 14:08 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote: > Hi, > > README champions the daemon as memory efficient (3-30MB RAM) and I'd > like to send a patch that removes the whole paragraph since that's no > longer the case. > Could you back up such statement with valgrind logs? If that'

[Tracker] trackerd memory efficiency

2009-01-23 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
Hi, README champions the daemon as memory efficient (3-30MB RAM) and I'd like to send a patch that removes the whole paragraph since that's no longer the case. -- my place on the web: floss-and-misc.blogspot.com ___ tracker-list mailing list tracker-li