Problem sloved. i don't know how.
installed trisquel 5.5( i was at trisquel 5), use gpt.
On Friday 12 Oct 2012 21:26:40 Quiliro Ordóñez wrote:
El 12/10/12 18:40, and...@andrewlindley.co.uk escribió:
He did ask me, well y'know, to be intimate with him once. But none of
the acts he suggested were my kind of thing. However, I do know
people who are interested in that kind of
I have several partitions on my drive, and I currently have Kubuntu and
CrunchBang installed. I'd like to follow the development of Trisquel 6.0, so
I downloaded, burned, and booted the 10/8 alpha.
Regretfully, ubi-portman failed, and I was unable to continue. Before it
failed, a bunch of
System info show my grafics idenfied as VESA: 6330. so how shoul i change it
to Sis 661.
Thank you for the answer.
I Didn't remembered about LGPL to be honest.
But the original content could still loose this audience even being GPL'ed at
100%, it is a matter of what is done by the forker, or am I wrong :S ?
Is that even possible ? (PS: your avatar + the text... just priceless xD)
Two Questions:
1 - Are you on a laptop or on a desktop ?
2 - Could you try to connect an external display (different from the original
one) to see the available resolution ?
Don't even know if this bug affects my 16.0 version of IceWeasel...
If it is like my Broadcom BCM4313 then it is something to forget :s...
everything is available but there is no Firmware ! The worst is that the
suppose driver file is available, but (I don't know really how) something
else is missing, reported to be the firmware.
Why don't buy an internal Wifi PCI Card from ThinkPenguin ? In my opinion it
is better than having to go everywhere with you Wifi Adapter :S... I had the
chance to own a laptop with a Realtek Wifi card compatible with the
Linux-Libre Kernel, but if I didn't then I would have purchased an
I'm not gay, but I do respect those that are and live their lives as they
want to live it. It is tough for many of them especially when they were
younger and got picked on by those who were intolerant.
I know this thread is off topic, but I got laid last night. Did you?
Arizona Department of Game and Fish ?
I feel like I'm repeating myself, but a more permissive license allows
everyone to contribute. You say there is the worry that it gets too big and a
company will fork and make a proprietary version. The reality is that its too
much work to maintain a.fork of that size and they will rather
Will consider it a feature that AGPL does not allow slavers and hoarders
to contribute and use it for my future projects. Who else does it not
allow to contribute?
There are big companies maintaining forks or rewriting whole projects to
avoid the GPL version 3. Making their work harder while
I agree with you on this one. We need to spread the Free Software Word around
the World, but we can't force people, so we might just play their games,
and because of this, we need to be a little bit permissive with the license
of some components (but not going outside of the Free Software
I also saw in section 5 of the Elance contract at
https://www.elance.com/p/legal/services-agreement-between-client-and-contractor.pdf
that they forbid you not use GPL code as a contractor working with a client.
They don't want to be held liable for copyleft code that could force the
client
I never saw that O_o... :
Background Technology.
Contractor will disclose any Background Technology which Contractor proposes
to use or incorporate in connection with performance of its services to
Client. If Contractor discloses no Background Technology, Contractor warrants
that it will
If you use a GPL-licensed library, your application must be distributed under
the terms of this same license.
It most certainly does.
Yeah ! (not...) I had the little hope that it had been solved... silly me xD
Yes I know about that xD
Yeah ! (not...) I had the little hope that it had been solved... silly me xD
I was wondering why Trisquel is always one release behind Ubuntu? Ubuntu is
about to release the 12.10 version and Trisquel hasn't even released the
version correspondent to 12.04.
To me it doesn't seem to be lack of development, but instead it seems to be
planned this way, but maybe i'm
If I recall correctly, quidam considers a just released Ubuntu not
stable enough for Trisquel to be based on it, there are bugs fixed after
the release, so he waits several months before starting the development
of a next Trisquel release. I don't know Ubuntu development so I cannot
verify this
The fix was released the same day. The result is in the version 16.0.1.
Analizing Tegskywalker's responses, I can deduce he is not older than
15. That is valuable data to help him overcome his lack/excess of love
during his childhood. Possibly he was even subject to sexual harrasment.
Usually a person gives as has received in the past.
--
Saludos libres,
Quiliro
You guessed it... spent most of my childhood with my mother's boyfriends
watching me shower and paint me in acrylics.
There is no discussion of Trisquel here, only personal attacks. I doubt t3g
wants this, nor do other members, including me.
Can this thread please be locked or deleted?
Does anyone know when quidam expects Trisquel 6.0 to be ready?
What the hell is going on here? Can someone explain?
I don't know what Rubén's reasons are although having experience in this
area I can tell you why I'd plan for a release 6 months after the release of
the derived distribution. For one I wouldn't have to worry about bugs
unrelated to the changes I've made. A stable distribution means I don't
This actually makes sense. The GNU project doesn't accept contributions
without the assignment of copyright either. That's essentially is all this is
saying. This may not be in the companies best interest although there are
good reasons to have such clauses.
It's the version that has been released :D Thanks for the information !
El 13/10/12 18:35, andrew.rof...@student.qut.edu.au escribió:
There is no discussion of Trisquel here, only personal attacks. I
doubt t3g wants this, nor do other members, including me.
Can this thread please be locked or deleted?
I think this thread is important because it issues an
El 13/10/12 18:16, tegskywal...@hotmail.com escribió:
You guessed it... spent most of my childhood with my mother's
boyfriends watching me shower and paint me in acrylics.
So you confront that by harrassing your co-listers? Wouldn't it be more
productiive to address the problem directly?
Sex is not freedom respecting software.
Go away.
It is not intended towards personal attacks. It is intended
to help a community member confront and solve issues with other members
without recurring to censorship.
Posting about a person's sexuality and maturity on a public forum hardly
seems helpful.
I am not trying to censor you
37 matches
Mail list logo
