On this official website, Following two pages contains mirror & image link
related information:
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/packages-repository
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/mirroring-trisquel
Same for me.
The bug report has been already submitted in Issues.
SirGrant has assigned the bug to upstream for a patch; I conclude it is
solved in Ubuntu 14.10 (Utopic) and the patch will soon be available for
Trisquel 7.0
Looks like it's Apport that's sending the message. What actually causes it
might be found in /var/crash.
Well said.
"Covered Code" only covers what you get from Microsoft. It doesn't apply to,
say, independent implementations - only to that which you get from Microsoft
(reference ""Covered Code" means those Microsoft .NET libraries and runtime
components as made available by Microsoft at..." a
I wrote:
To my reading, what you get from Microsoft here is just as risky for us
to depend on as what they offered years ago. So, as the FSF pointed out
years ago, "It only says that Microsoft will not sue you over claims in
patents that it owns or controls. If Microsoft sells one of those
patent
I wrote:
To my reading, what you get from Microsoft here is just as risky for us
to depend on as what they offered years ago. So, as the FSF pointed out
years ago, "It only says that Microsoft will not sue you over claims in
patents that it owns or controls. If Microsoft sells one of those
patent
> System Program Problem Detected Do you want to report the problem
> now?
I get this as well, so it's probably not an isolated issue.
Andrew
On just one of my many machines that I've upgraded to Trisquel 7 I'm getting
an error message when I log in. I only get it if I use KDE or gnome-shell. It
is a popup that comes up before gnome-shell even loads and it says:
System Program Problem Detected
Do you want to report the problem now?
In Trisquel 7 when I use sudo I get this message:
no talloc stackframe at ../source3/param/loadparm.c:4864, leaking memory
Is anyone else seeing this?
Hi titi
What did you do to solve this?
I've said this here multiple times about Mozilla Public License 2.0 being a
good choice as it is copyleft at the file level.
G4JC,
The bullet points you provided are for the standard Chrome and not all of
them apply to Chromium. For example:
* Installation-ID - Doesn't exist in Chromium
* Suggestions - In both Chrome and Chromium. This can be disabled in the
settings or disabled entirely if Chromium source code i
ponpon4 - seriously? tinfoil hat? is that supposed to be funny? So original
you are..
google is by far the worst company on internet as far as privacy is
concerned. That is a fact. I avoid google products and don't have any respect
nor trust in anything google does. We are talking about an om
The reason for the core to be permissively licensed is to keep having
proprietary software around. Like additional libraries that (potentially free
software) applications will use (making them impossible to run in freedom). I
see nothing positive in that.
And the GPL often is a good choice
Thank you! :-)
gromo...@web.de wrote:
I couldn't believe my eyes:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2014/11/12/net-core-is-open-source.aspx
Mono hacker and "open source" enthusiast Miguel de Icaza has announced
an intention to continue to add Microsoft's code to Mono stating "Like
we did in the past wi
On 2014-11-12
tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Good for you. I can do the same thing, but hosting places want autonomy and
> simplicity with a pre-built image.
That's exactly why we have our own home servers - we can control what we put
there. Ruben already does a lot of work, I wouldn't add m
> More testing has shown, that wifi transfer rates vary and sometimes
> the wifi disconnects. Placing a router antenna at another place did
> not improve the wifi connection.
> I think, I will return to the isp router. You wrote, set mode to
> 40mhz. In wireless network master -> device config -> a
As others mentioned it would hurt fingerprinting, test here for example:
https://panopticlick.eff.org
I think by default TOR Browser doesn't allow foreign extensions (for your
security). It would be possible to override this at your own peril. You could
accomplish similar simply by using GNUI
It is "Open Source" but not "Free Software", the main difference being it
suggests non-free plugins and includes many anti-features. I actually had
wanted Google Chrome and/or Chromium myself when I first switched to
GNU/Linux.
Whereas would be possible to do, large amounts of code would need
What about the V8 JavaScript engine that powers Node.js? How about the SPDY
protocol? AngularJS? The Go programming language? Tesseract? You also must
have forgotten about the VP8 and VP9 codecs in WebM.
Most quality FLOSS software is backed by a corporation or successful
non-profit. Deal w
More testing has shown, that wifi transfer rates vary and sometimes the wifi
disconnects. Placing a router antenna at another place did not improve the
wifi connection.
I think, I will return to the isp router. You wrote, set mode to 40mhz. In
wireless network master -> device config -> advan
What, like the Droid fonts, which are under the Apache License and included
in Trisquel by default?
Take off your tinfoil hat. Being made by Google isn't a problem. Not being
possible to exercise one of the four freedoms is.
Sorry for being unclear. xev is a command you type at the terminal, ditto
xbindkeys. The xev command brings up a little white box, move the cursor
inside it. Now you'll see some output in the terminal window you launched xev
from. Part of that output is keysyms for the keys you press.
I can
Uh, I got lost again...
What is a xev command?
What is a keysym?
What is xbindkeys?
Good for you. I can do the same thing, but hosting places want autonomy and
simplicity with a pre-built image.
I have Trisquel on my own email/web server and I installed it using the
network installer. The server is a KVM virtual server and not a cgroups jail.
Trisquel at this point is pretty much a desktop only OS that cleans out the
Ubuntu install and changes around some packages while blacklisting others.
Its nice to have a libre desktop and all, but the developers should take the
server space more seriously too.
I'm talking maybe a server ISO
There's more than a little difference between Google and Canonical. Though,
that said, fiduciary duty, which is the legal requirement that all officers
of a company/Corporation act at all times in the organisation's best
interests (meaning best economic interests) stands contrary to the idea
titi,
Seems you are using Trisquel(default) desktop enviornment, where I too have
encountered this problem. Try logging in using the Gnome desktop
enviornment.(Click the Icon of Trisquel near to your name in login screen and
select GNOME.)
By the way, I have submitted a bug report; If int
Thankfully its under the MIT license, meaning there are no restrictions on
development and deployment. It was smart to go with a permissive license
instead of the GPL since these are libraries.
Chromium is free software and shouldn't be blacklisted in Trisquel.
bd idea
If you really care about sofware freedom and value your privacy I'd like to
suggest you not to use anything made by google...
I couldn't believe my eyes:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dotnet/archive/2014/11/12/net-core-is-open-source.aspx
Thank you very much for your work and for this feedback. It clarifies a lot.
Finally, I gave everything to the original state.
I open nautilus and in the left pane I click on the media to rise.
It will also ... until perhaps another solution.
Hello every one:
I just wanted to share how I came to disable the new beaver on trisquel's
files manager, in which starts a search every time you start typing something
in the keyboard. This would be fine if it weren't so slow, at least on my
think penguin laptop.
Run the following comma
My pre-existing install of Greasemonkey has been disabled on my Toutatis
install since the last Abrowser update, but when I copy the backup of my
config files over, it works just fine on my USB sticks and VMs of Belenos.
I'm not nagging or anything
Well, maybe I am. Just a litle. ;)
GPL incompatible licenses are not a problem here as long as they still are
free software licenses.
(Generally of course GPL incompatibility is a bad idea it being the most used
free software license and all.)
There is a feature request in the Trisquel issue tracker:
https://trisquel.info/en/issues/4353
Andrew
Anyway NOW it's in the abrowser's add-ons.
I think it has something to do with Chromium licenses.
Some licences (like Ms-PL or MPL) are GPL-Incompatible, according to FSF :
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html
Furthermore, Chromium code includes unlicensed files i.e. nonfree.
On script trisquelize.sh from
https://trisquel.info/en/wiki/migrate-ubuntu-trisquel-without-reinstalling ,
I noticed that it ask for removal of non-free packages installed. where
`chromium-browser` is also listed inside script as follows:
echo ---
ec
According to https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/greasemonkey/ it
is distributed under the terms of the MIT/X11 License, a free software
license.
As if any other company or developer could ever be 'trusted'.
That's why we need free software.
I don't see any reason why duckduckgo should be more trustworthy than google.
Your arguing reminds me of the makers of prism break stating that trisquel
shouldn't be used since it's based on ubuntu a
46 matches
Mail list logo
