That would mean that after all we must wait impatiently (because of the
pollution issues, mainly) for the time when some degree of great number of
people desire and demand their freedoms of their free will.
Would we only be able to bring the date forward? This is not tempting you
into
Sounds lovely and utopian and completely impossible to enforce in the real
world. You'd have to install a proprietary back door that you could use to
spy on the users and to shut down the operation of the program if you
disagreed with their use. But your proprietary code and spying would
As usual, rms explains it best:
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/programs-must-not-limit-freedom-to-run.html
It seems redundant because if they use it for harm, they can get sued anyway
and even if they couldn't, people wouldn't blame the software, they would
blame the user.
A lot of free software users' love for freedom goes beyond the realm software
and have noticed no matter what the
https://www.wired.com/story/open-source-license-requires-users-do-no-harm/
"Coraline Ada Ehmke wants to give her fellow developers more control over how
their software is used. Software released under her new "Hippocratic License"
can be shared and modified for almost any purpose, with one
