Re: [Trisquel-users] An Open Source License That Requires Users to Do No Harm

[softwdensky]

That would mean that after all we must wait impatiently (because of the  
pollution issues, mainly) for the time when some degree of great number of  
people desire and demand their freedoms of their free will.
Would we only be able to bring the date forward? This is not tempting you  
into off-topic. His philosophy seems to be considered thoroughly. Our common  
sense and goodness would often encounter a piece of his philosophy. I mean,  
why did not she encounter it despite she seems to be an experienced developer  
and have goodness? If she knew it then, she might create an other unique idea  
and it might bring the date forward to some degree. Even a good developer had  
not shared his guide. It would be more difficult for normal users to share  
the philosophy. How happened that??