Re: [Trisquel-users] Help! Process scheduling issue

2014-12-06 Thread fr33domlover
Is the clean linux-libre kernel better for servers than trisquel's in terms of throughput vs performance? Will running a harddisk backup with duplicity freeze and OS for several hours (like Trisquel's kernel does for me) or will it keep everything usable (like I had it on Debian)? On 2014-12-03

Re: [Trisquel-users] Help! Process scheduling issue

2014-12-02 Thread fr33domlover
On 2014-12-02 t8mf4nu6l...@canaglie.net wrote: Looks like Trisquel 7 comes with low latency and BFQ scheduler kernel patches. Those probably make very little sense on a server. Perhaps try another kernel, e.g. from http://www.jxself.org/linux-libre/ I'm not sure about jxself's config

[Trisquel-users] Help! Process scheduling issue

2014-12-01 Thread fr33domlover
. Thanks in advance! Any help appreciated!!! -- fr33domlover signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [Trisquel-users] More focus should be put on server installations

2014-11-12 Thread fr33domlover
On 2014-11-12 tegskywal...@hotmail.com wrote: Good for you. I can do the same thing, but hosting places want autonomy and simplicity with a pre-built image. That's exactly why we have our own home servers - we can control what we put there. Ruben already does a lot of work, I wouldn't add