Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread contact
Privacy is terrorism. Got it.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread contact
Yes, privacy is terrorism. Got it. Thanks.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread shiretoko
The link you provided does not call people who are munging their mail adresses "terrorists", but the spam-senders. It advices not to "reducing the quality and functionality of the Internet" because of the spam. Overall it's a pretty strange article that has no sense for comparativeness. It fa

Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread Cassandra of Troy
Meh

Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
Indeed, I also don't like address munging, the real effective thing is to catch the message, report the full message (including headers, "Reply-To" and "Message-ID") to the domain owner from which the spam originated (both those listed in "From" and and "Reply-To" fields) and *only as a last resort

Re: [Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-23 Thread csh
http://www.interhack.net/pubs/munging-harmful/

[Trisquel-users] Apologies to J.B. Nicholson-Owens

2017-11-22 Thread contact
As a member of the Trisquel site some 4+ years, I was under the impression our email addresses (and other personal info) were kept confidential by the site maintainers. Therefore I was surprised when "J.B. Nicholson-Owens" responded to my, and other forum posts, by quoting our email addresses