TBH I play games very little these days. Partly because my ancient hardware
doesn't support many games, and partly because if I'm going to use a computer
to explore a virtual world, interact with characters, and find surprises and
excitement, there's no better multi-player game than The
GrevenGull
> There was some talk a while back that all SSDs contain proprietary software
I haven't tried to Libreboot this laptop, so I'm only running free code from
the kernel up. It's possible that there may be proprietary code built into
the BIOS (or some other part of the hardware) that
"I don't subscribe a mailing list to be using it as a web forum. by visiting
archive for each response)
Perhaps it may be worth considering if your email program can't tell you what
message is a reply to what? (Since you've indicated twice earlier that "I
don't see what are you answering
I don't subscribe a mailing list to be using it as a web forum.
(by visiting archive for each response)
https://trisquel.info/forum
El 17/4/19 a les 5:54, ja...@bluehome.net ha escrit:
> "I don't see what are you answering to"
>
> I was responding to you. It's all there on the web forums.
"I don't see what are you answering to"
I was responding to you. It's all there on the web forums. Check it out:
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/hello-everyone-i-have-question-about-part-trisquel-gnulinux#comment-140444
on #18, #19, #20.
nadebula.1984: "As long as Debian keeps i386
I don't see what are you answering to, but I remember that this list
thread was related to supported processors by Linux kernels.
El 16/4/19 a les 3:14, ja...@bluehome.net ha escrit:
> "currently requires i686 compatible processors."
>
> Perhaps; but the name of the architecture (in the package
My X40 does support Debian testing (buster) i386. However, it is possible
that my X40 has PAE support. I may need to check its CPU architecture (Banias
or Dothan).
"currently requires i686 compatible processors."
Perhaps; but the name of the architecture (in the package manager and when
downloading the ISO from debian.org) remains "i386" and so when you see
people mentioning "i386" in relation to Debian it is best to interpret that
to be a reference
I don't know what are you answering to; for x86 platform Debian
currently requires i686 compatible processors.
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#i386-is-now-almost-i686
Next version (Debian 10) will keep this architecture, but I don't know
about the
As long as Debian keeps i386 architecture, it's not a big problem.
I do have some legacy computers (32-bit CPU without PAE) running i386 version
of Debian testing. The only problem is that the very-old Intel integrated
graphics (830GM for X30 and 855GM for X40, respectively) are not well
What games do you play btw?:)
How does the software in SSDs work? There was some talk a while back that all
SSDs contain proprietary software (but there was disagreement if I recall
correctly about what this software could do/have access to).
Do you anything about this?
Mate is working really well for me and I probably have one of the oldest
computers anyone is still trying to use (bought in 2010):
https://www.coactivate.org/projects/disintermedia/bishop
I doubled the RAM to 2GB about a year ago. Just before that I replaced the
HDD with an SSD and as I've
All I said about Trisquel 10 is that it will be based on Ubuntu 20.04,
and that's all I know about it.
As for Trisquel 9, all I know is what I've gathered from tuning into
some of the Freedom Friday meetings, which is that the priority now
seems to be infrastructural improvements, that this
Hello monk of chaos, I am surprised to find a correspondence concerning
Trisquel 9 and even Trisquel 10.
May I ask you if there exists a content for the upcoming Trisquel on this
site?
Thank you very much in advance.
Yours sincerely torsten.
So am I. Often
I am one of them. Sometimes.
> True, but wouldn't that mean having to import an increasing number of
> packages from elsewhere?
I'm not sure exactly how much extra work it would be. It would certainly
help if there were an arch32-like community project. That said, I don't
see any reason to expect Ubuntu to drop 32-bit
Chaosmonk:
> Even if Ubuntu does drop 32-bit support, Trisquel doesn't necessarily have
to do the same
True, but wouldn't that mean having to import an increasing number of
packages from elsewhere? If the value of basing Trisquel off an upstream
distro is that it limits the amount of work
> I didn't know about the netboot discs and that they still
> had 32-bit support.
Understandable. I had to specifically look for them. The Ubuntu website
doesn't go out of its way to advertise that they support more
architectures than amd64.
> All that I knew was that flavors of Ubuntu (such as
Thanks for answering everyone! As for a few questions up above. No, I do not
know if Ubuntu is going to drop 32-bit support or if they have plans on doing
so, I didn't know about the netboot discs and that they still had 32-bit
support. All that I knew was that flavors of Ubuntu (such as
Actually, as long everything is under the free software foundation, and el
viejo, guidance, they could built a snasam software, it does not mean
nothning to me.I still believe in el viejo the fundation
Nobody knows... ;)
Even if Ubuntu does this it doesn't necessarily follow that Trisquel must as
well. There has been no announcement that Trisquel will be doing this.
> I wanted to know if plans to dropping 32-bit support and only 64
> will be the future for Trisquel 9 Etiona?
Trisquel 9 will be based on Ubuntu 18.04. Since 18.04 has 32-bit support
I do not think it will be a problem for Trisquel 9. Trisquel 9 will also
add support for some non-x68
Recently I've been seeing that some GNU/Linux distributions have been
dropping 32-bit support out of their plans. This including Ubuntu and Arch
(although, for the latter, there is arch32 which fixes that and the
libre-projects known as Parabola GNU/Linux and Hyperbola have 32-bit versions
26 matches
Mail list logo
