[Trisquel-users] Re : Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-02 Thread lcerf
As far as I understand, Mozilla's main point is how these technologies prevent Firefox's core from easily evolving, especially performance-wise. An exception was made for Flash but it is easier to maintain NPAPI working for Flash than for any plugin. That said, I had rather see Flash

[Trisquel-users] Re : Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread lcerf
It is not like NPAPI, XUL and XPCOM are dropped with no reason. NPAPI "plugins are a source of performance problems, crashes, and security incidents": https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/ WebExtensions' API does not expose Firefox's internals as much