Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-17 Thread Caleb Herbert
So THAT'S why it's as slow as a wretched Yeeloong... :-(

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-17 Thread Caleb Herbert
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 06:12 +0200, andypro...@gmail.com wrote: > How about supporting the ASUS Chromebook C201? It's supported by > libreboot,   > and there should be some of them available. > https://libreboot.org/docs/hardware/c201.html Ew.  Those things are worse than, or just as bad as, a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-13 Thread jason
Right; the full free software option on that device is described on https://libreboot.org/docs/hardware/c201.html The "TL;DR" summary is that the WiFi (which is soldered on) and the graphics need proprietary junk. The workarounds would be to unsolder the WiFi and replace it or use a USB one

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-12 Thread onpon4
The SoC used by the C201 is actually a very good one, in fact it's one of the SoCs lkcl is looking at for the next EOMA68 computer card. Libreboot is not needed for Chromebooks, by the way. They come with Das U-boot installed. The only concern is how well the SoC works with Linux-libre

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-12 Thread andyprough
How about supporting the ASUS Chromebook C201? It's supported by libreboot, and there should be some of them available. https://libreboot.org/docs/hardware/c201.html Would it be possible to get Trisquel working on that kind of hardware, with the Rockchip SoC and all? Delete all the Google

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-12 Thread hd-scania
Here, Parabola instead needs to discontinue i686 and extend to more arm ports, due to its rolling benefit. For Trisquel since it's LTS we can try to liberate Raspbian to become our Trisquel ARM.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-12 Thread alonivtsan
Trisquel has never supported other architectures even if those offered freer computers, such as the Lemote Yeelong MIPS laptop (which was supported by gNewSense). This might have been partially due to Ubuntu focusing on x86 releases compared to Debian. I understand the logic regarding the

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-12 Thread jason
I think you misunderstand. https://jxself.org/titanic.shtml This is to address the problem of libreboot-supported systems drying up. For an example, try finding a PDP-10 computer today. That's what the future holds for librebootable x86 machines. Since most aren't in production anymore

Re: [Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-11 Thread alonivtsan
Shouldn't Trisquel focus on timely releases for x86 (which most people use) before supporting other architectures? The latest version of Trisquel is based on a two and a half old release of Ubuntu (which means a lot of software is outdated). The priority should be on releasing a new version

[Trisquel-users] Trisquel on non-x86 systems

2018-08-11 Thread jason
https://trisquel.info/en/issues/24694 Maybe commenting on this will help show interest?