Is it possible for the OP (or an admin) to modify the title of this post to
something more specific, and add "solved"? This could be helpful to other
users who strike a similar problem and try searching the forums for help
before starting a new thread.
As you say the BusyBox ash terminal does not show fsck as a valid command
BUT your advice of running "fsck -y /dev/sda5" worked perfectly. I do
appreciate your help. Thank you very much.
Ray
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 21:36, Ray Brown wrote:
> I am away this weekend but will try next week when I
I am away this weekend but will try next week when I get back. Thanks
On Thu, 6 Feb 2020, 20:36 , wrote:
> So /dev/sda5 may contain a damaged filesystem, and it might be an
> important
> one. There are some posts on the Internet with problems kind of similar
> to
> yours. Most of them
So /dev/sda5 may contain a damaged filesystem, and it might be an important
one. There are some posts on the Internet with problems kind of similar to
yours. Most of them recommend trying to fix the damaged partition, which
fixed the problem. Did you try running "fsck -y /dev/sda5"?
However,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
My computer is a Lenovo T400 reconditioned from "Ministry of Freedom" with
Libreboot and no disk encryption or LVM.
The error message when exiting from the Busybox shell is:
dev/sda5 contains a file system with errors. Check forced.
My visible partitions etc are:
Could this be a device dependent problem?
One of my installs on an old second hand laptop works fine with the newest
Trisquel updates. (I don't have access to any other hardware right now)
What kind of device are you using? Is it an X200, like bsharp1157? Does it
have libreboot installed?
I have the same problem as B Sharp, my boot starts OK with the flash screen
of Gnu and Tux but then I get a similar Terminal screen:
BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1.4) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands
I then get a prompt
(initramfs)
I suspect an
Hi,
Has anyone else got the error "efi_memmap is not enable" while booting the
lastest kernel ?
Then there is a lof of errors that I can't catch cause it is the same message
repeating in a loop at a really high speed.
Once in a while if I forgot to switch the kernel version in grub,and the
I didn't do anything. Apologies for the miscommunication.
Based on
> While the minimal iso image is handy, it isn't useful for installing on
UEFI-based systems that you want to run in UEFI mode. The mini iso lacks the
proper files for booting the computer in UEFI mode. Thus, the computer
How? Please tell what you did.
The link about the minimal install solved my mystery. Thanks!
I burned the ISO to CD-ROM. Now it shows up at Boot Manager (Option down) as
EFI Boot, but it won't actually boot the OS from it. Only a "minimal grub
environment" is shown.
Here are the contents of the disc.
Netinstall ISO has two partitions sdb1 and sdb2.
sdb 8:16 1 14.4G 0 disk
├─sdb1 8:17 131M 0 part
└─sdb2 8:18 1 6M 0 part /media/user/Firmware
I don't think macs can boot DOS partitions without a boot manager such as
rEFInd.
Appreciate the response.
Thought I was crazy for a second, but I got it to work it seems.
On my macbook with macOS installed it works, as in the drive appears when I
hold option on start up.
However, on my macbook that I wiped and installed Ubuntu it does not appear.
So I guess one solution
Hello triskellions!
I'm trying to boot Trisquel NetInstall on my macbook. I used Etcher to write
the iso to the MicroSD card. But the drive doesn't seem to be available on
startup. No problem with the normal version though. When I plug the drive
into my computer the name says firmware as
Try removing the bootwait option?
The title sums it up,
I was unable to boot, and notices that my NAS was of, I have some shares from
my nas.
This is from my fstab
santalucia:/volume1/music /mnt/music nfs
bootwait,nouser,atime,auto,rw,dev,exec,nosuid 0 0
santalucia:/volume1/web /mnt/web nfs
thanks lembas, that fixed it.
Heh; all of this about some password you don't know being needed to add
nomodeset. I added nomodeset to mine with Trisquel 6 and never needed a
password other than my own.
For the recod it's easy to add nomodeset and no mystery password is needed.
Step 1: Edit /etc/default/grub and add
http://www.coachsoutletonline-usa.com/ coach outlet usa coach outlet online
http://www.ourcoachoutletonline.com/ coach outlet online usa coach outlet
http://www.newmichaelkorspurse.com/ michael kors purses outlet
http://www.mk-michaelkoroutlet.com/ michael kors outlet online
Big deal. There's no one need for your bickering.
Every feature and every default setting in any software was decided by
someone else, not you. Most programs allow you to configure them, and all
free software allow you to change it. Then you can share you versions, if you
think you can and
Hello guys, just installes the last Trisquel 6.0 in my computer. and, when I
was at the grub, where I had to select what OS to enter to, I found that it
was impossible to run it, because the boot commands were not on nomodeset.
So, I go to edit boot commands when, surprise! it tells me to
I believe that the developer, BY PROGRAMMING this feature. is a TOTAL
CONTROL FREAK! He is using the excuse of Security to excuse himself.
For me, someone telling me, that I will need a password to boot from grub, I
should have the option to decide, not the developer!
As a user, I
I already solved it! Thanks!
If anyone want to know what I did, I puted back the live-cd of Trisquel,
downloaded grub customizer and customizate the boot commands from there.
I would hardly call a single bad design decision the death of Trisquel.
There's always Ubuntu with 12.04.2 released today:
http://www.ubuntu.com/download
Thank you for sharing; that's great! However, this should never be
necessary!
On 02/14/2013 03:28 PM, danel...@gmail.com wrote:
I already solved it! Thanks!
If anyone want to know what I did, I puted back the live-cd of Trisquel,
downloaded grub customizer and customizate the boot
We don't suggest proprietary software here.
28 matches
Mail list logo
