Thank you both for answering me. I tried the options which you suggested.
There are issues with scrot and with finding additional library dependencies.
I am sure that I do not have the required skills to reliably perform these
operations. I will stay with Trisquel 7.0 for the time being.
scrot
I find Scrot to be quite inconvenient (though I might just not know how to
use it properly. PrtSc should achieve a similar result. If that's what you're
looking for. I recommend you take a look at Flameshot. Allows for screenshot
selections, annotations and other convenient features.
Hello,
I installed uruk_2.0-xfce-i686.iso on an Asus Eee PC with 989 M of ram.
The system boots and runs well for the most part.
I have had one occurance where letting it load to the default system
without hitting return caused the system to freeze on the splash screen
after the grub menu was no
So I logged into the beta (in a second partition on my PC), and downloaded
and installed all updates. Do I now have an installed system equivalent to a
release candidate? I want to get clarity on this before I start reporting the
bugs and #UX issues I've noticed so far.
TL;DR
I've tried out Uruk GNU/Linux 2.0 beta2.
I liked it.
What this is:
This post is a little feedback / review on trying to try out the second beta
of Uruk 2. I half expected that the final release would be out before this
post, and that's indeed what happened, but I'll post this
If I log into the beta (in a second partition on my PC), and download and
install all updates, will that result in an installed system equivalent to a
release candidate? If so, I will do that and post any notes here in the next
couple of days.
Been a long time since I posted. Running Uruk on a Librebooted Thinkpad T500
and its running really smooth.
The installation worked without a hitch. Once installed and rebooted I run
the updates and rebooted again. No issues.
The control center is great. Nice short cuts to just about
As always, thank you for you help, Supertramp. I do have the sourceforge
link. What I'm looking for is somewhere for people to go to get a snapshot
of what Uruk is, and what it provides.
Maybe it is too soon, and after Beta there will be something official.
Here you are, mate Mattress ->
https://sourceforge.net/projects/urukos/files/2.0/Beta2/
The Uruk Website is down it seems. Is there no other website?I want
somewhere to direct friends to.
Thanks.
if Guix were pre-installed- I will be happy. I also want Uruk 2.0 with xfce4
desktop. Because my pc configuration is low. Mate menu is not so fast.
Yes.
Meaning that it includes all packages from Flidas plus a second repository
containing its own packages?
It has its own and uses the Trisquel repository.
Will Uruk use the Trisquel repository or will it have its own?
The last time I installed the Uruk 2 beta, the firmware for this Wi-Fi
adapter was missing. Maybe you have fixed this already, but I just wanted to
let you know.
I like the Uruk control center and welcome screens. They give it a distinct
look and feel; thanks for making sure the accessibility works on those custom
screens. I would like to see the indicator applet replaced with the standard
Mate applets, namely NetworkManager and Sound Volume. A
I only ran the last Beta version live without installing and it was a little
while ago, but here's what I remember:
(1) I liked the default MATE configuration better than Trisquel's, primarily
because it had a search bar, making it easier to find the things I wanted to
change.
(2) The
Hi Hayderctee
I enjoyed the Uruk Control center, that's what gave Uruk some "particularity"
or "singularity"
so i would vote for "keep it as is".
Bravo anyways, and thanks to both of you ;-)
Hi
Uruk 2.0 is almost done but we can't released now because we need your
opinion and feedback, so what you missed in last beta released and what you
want to see in stable released, and what your opinion about uruk control
center ( do you like it, or you like to return to mate control
20 matches
Mail list logo
