Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-12-08 Thread Adonay Felipe Nogueira
If I recall correctly, isn't GNU IceCat constantly being updated also in Trisquel? I noticed this to be true because when I inspect the version of the package in the repositories, I get the same version I'm using now from GNU Guix. So I vote for sticking with GNU IceCat from Trisquel.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-04 Thread hd-scania
LXQt, the 3 years old lightweight Q5 desktop, but dependent on aging and anti-aesthetic Openbox to be wm, but I am usually using kwin5 or xfwm4, even extracting ones from the parallel desktops alongside my systems instead.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-04 Thread hd-scania
It is already old-school to still be mentioning Midori, and LXQt has been in the cutting edge for the Gtk+, Xfce, KDE refugees since 2014, so LXQt related QupZilla has been also in the WebKit cutting edge. WebKit based: Midori hasn't seen a new release since 2015 and was recently removed by

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-02 Thread alonivtsan
ALSA is part of Linux, the kernel, so it is probably more common than the optional sound server PulseAudio.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-02 Thread alonivtsan
NPAPI "plugins are a source of performance problems, crashes, and security incidents": https://blog.mozilla.org/futurereleases/2015/10/08/npapi-plugins-in-firefox/ Mozilla didn't remove the entire NPAPI code base. They still support Adobe Flash. If the stability and security bothered them

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread legimet . calc
I use Firefox ESR. Works fine for now, but it will break WebExtensions at some point next year.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread greatgnu
>you can download manually the compressed package from official website and install it not install but rather extract it and then run the executable, just pointing out. >this build has automatic upgrade tool activated It doesn't work sadly, well.. it does, partially in that it alerts of a

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread dhood
I use surf along with dwm as my window manager and find it works very well once one gets used to the controls not being graphically based.

Re: [Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread elr
Official Website: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/ Repo: https://www.waterfoxproject.org/downloads Note: also you can download manually the compressed packages from official website and install it, this build has automatic upgrade tool activated, if you download Waterfox from the repo, this

[Trisquel-users] Which browser should one use if one is after stability and support for existing features?

2017-11-01 Thread alonivtsan
As you know Trisquel's recent releases (6 and 7 and the upcoming 8) are long term releases. These releases tend to offer software which does not receive version updates for the available packages, however they do offer version updates for the main Mozilla browser. Many of the browsers