Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 5:49:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Iâll buy a copy.  Perhaps even submit a blurb for the dust jacket J You are scaring me a little.    I bought the entire 14 volume set of Barthâs Church Dogmatics last week. (Through Lance)  I give myself a

Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 3:51:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Where do we lookâin âFictionâ or in âHumorâ? J Izzy The Classics.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PR

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 3:51:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Of the many copies we have I enjoy the NASB the mostâI find it hard to follow the antiquated English in the KJV. What do you read? Izzy   I persoanlly think it is the best of the translations for accuracy

Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
DAVEH:  Thank you for sharing your perspective, John.     I have a question about #2.  Do you believe the Bible contains all God wants us to know? I believe that the biblical record, especially the NT scriptures, records the Divine Exchange between God and the First Church.   If He told those fo

RE: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Slade Henson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is in Dark Red [EMAIL PROTECTED] is in Sea Green     I do not believe in original sin — From what I understand of the concept, nor do I.   I do not believe in the efficacy of liturgical activity — I disagree with this. I find it comforting and appealing.   I do not

RE: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Jonathan Hughes
I’ll buy a copy.  Perhaps even submit a blurb for the dust jacket J   I bought the entire 14 volume set of Barth’s Church Dogmatics last week. (Through Lance)  I give myself a decade to read it and digest it.  That allowss 2 times through before I am 50 (50-20 = my approaching mid life ag

RE: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Slade Henson
Hello, Terry. To begin at the end, God never INTENDED anyone to be maimed, deformed, or retarded. We live in a sinful world and this sin has had a terrible effect on our bodies, minds, political systems, etc. The person has a body and the Spirit of God has breathed the breath of life into him and

RE: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
Where do we look—in “Fiction” or in “Humor”? J Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16   In a message dated 8/27/2004 5

RE: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
Of the many copies we have I enjoy the NASB the most—I find it hard to follow the antiquated English in the KJV. What do you read? Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 9:51 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Su

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Judy Taylor
    On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:24:05 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In a message dated 8/27/2004 3:37:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Hi John, you write: jt:  I don't want to put anyone in a box of any kind Izzy.  However, I have to believe that God means what Hes

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 5:38:02 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John, It may come as a surprise to you, but Rom 2:12-16 has been in the Bible for as long as Iâve had a copy.  And Iâve always agreed with it. Izzy What copyu of the Bible do you have? John

Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 5:35:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: John, Youâll have to write your own dictionary, but if thatâs your definition, I can agree.  I think youâre a blessing, Izzy   I am thinking of writing a systematic theology.   Imagine, me on the same she

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/27/2004 3:37:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi John, you write:   jt:  I don't want to put anyone in a box of any kind Izzy.  However, I have to believe that God means what He says and that His Word says what he means.   Actually, I have evidence th

Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Judy Taylor
    On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:06:16 -0400 Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Surely the glee is inappropriate, and we are not to forget that vengeance is His, but it does not take a genius to tell that some people, in their present position, are a shoo-in for Hell.  You shall know

RE: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Clifton Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 5:06 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16   Dave Hansen wrote: Judy Taylor wrote: DaveH:   To me, it seems most Christians are

RE: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
John, It may come as a surprise to you, but Rom 2:12-16 has been in the Bible for as long as I’ve had a copy.  And I’ve always agreed with it. Izzy   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:23 AM To: [EMAIL P

RE: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread ShieldsFamily
John, You’ll have to write your own dictionary, but if that’s your definition, I can agree.  I think you’re a blessing, Izzy   --How do you define “fundamentalist liberal”?  I asked if that isn’t an oxymoron but got no response. Thanks, Fundamentalist  -- requiring book, cha

Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Terry Clifton
Dave Hansen wrote: Judy Taylor wrote: DaveH:   To me, it seems most Christians are quite willing to consign anybody to hell who does not outright proclaim Jesus.  And, I think I've noted a tone of glee when some suggest such folks deserve the tortures of

[TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Judy Taylor
  Hi John, you write:   jt:  I don't want to put anyone in a box of any kind Izzy.  However, I have to believe that God means what Hesays and that His Word says what he means.   Actually, I have evidence that this might not  be entirely accurate.   If you believe that, why are constantly hel

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/26/2004 1:01:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: jt: I don't want to put anyone in a box of any kind Izzy.  However, I have to believe that God means what He says and that His Word says what he means. Actually, I have evidence that this might not  be entir

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/26/2004 12:31:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I still maintain that a lot of non-Believers are not bereft of sacrificial love. It is wrong to put them all in a box marked âunregenerate Gentilesâ together. Izzy I'm telling you,   think Ro 2:12-16.  

Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/26/2004 8:18:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, no!  Then I must be one of them âfundamentalist liberalsâ, too!!! (Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear!!!) Oh, wait, I think perhaps we might differ on a point or two, if you can explain to me what you me

Re: [TruthTalk] Who can be saved?

2004-08-27 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 8/26/2004 9:06:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Strange, I whenever I hit âReplyâ to jtâs post, the post itself disappears!  Oh, well.  In response to jtâs assumption that A retarded person could not fulfill God's law by instinct any more than an unreg

Re: [Fwd: Re: [TruthTalk] Romans 2:12-16

2004-08-27 Thread Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not a Pretestant. DAVEH:  How do you classify yourself, John?  Is there an equivalent moniker of the political independent with which you feel comfortable?  And.do you doctrinally reject Protestant dogma?  And.do you accept the Trinity Doctri