In a message dated 12/4/2004 11:07:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Wright does not believe it came from Gamaliel."
Then I would want to go with Wright -- or, before disagreeing with him, have my quackers in a row. I'm thrilled that you are enjoying Wright. He is definitely
"Wright does not believe it came from
Gamaliel."
Then I would want to go with Wright -- or, before
disagreeing with him, have my quackers in a row. I'm thrilled that you are
enjoying Wright. He is definitely the New Testament -- and especially
Pauline -- scholar of record these days. Not eve
In a message dated 12/4/2004 10:33:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
isthisquestionfromasemiticpointofvieworwestern
consideringthedepthofgamalielsunderstandingof
yeshuaandhisfollowersiwanttosayyesithinksobutof
coursethatsbecauseiwanttohopegamalielwassaved
insomethingresem
In a message dated 12/4/2004 10:10:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
excusememrcommentatorwasthatsupposedtobesixorsexisitpossiblethattheoriginalauthormayhavemisspeeled
somethingontheotherhandifitissexyouthwhydidinotknowofitinmyyouth
jeffprayformeasiamgettingverynaughtywithth
In a message dated 12/4/2004 9:54:53 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
youmightsaythatontheotherhanditsgreattoseethatsomeoneistryingtodeciphertextandfindmeaningto
thejumblehoweverthisisnoteasyasihavetoperformmyownspellcheckthetranslatingisuptoyou
jeff
- Original Message
:>) Me too.
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Powers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 11:32
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
isthisquestionfromasemiticpointofvieworwestern
consideringthedepthofgamalielsunderstandingo
jeff in something of a normal mode. Izzy what
evidence do you use to support your idea that Gamaliel rejected Yeshua? I cannot
find it! If anything, Gamaliel supported Yeshua and the Way.
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturd
isthisquestionfromasemiticpointofvieworwestern
consideringthedepthofgamalielsunderstandingof
yeshuaandhisfollowersiwanttosayyesithinksobutof
coursethatsbecauseiwanttohopegamalielwassaved
insomethingresemblingwhatwejointlyunderstand
savedtomean
jeffthewishfulphilosopher
- Original Message
excusememrcommentatorwasthatsupposedtobesixorsexisitpossiblethattheoriginalauthormayhavemisspeeled
somethingontheotherhandifitissexyouthwhydidinotknowofitinmyyouth
jeffprayformeasiamgettingverynaughtywiththis
psbetteryetmaybesomeoneshouldgetoutthepaddleandspankme
- Original Message -
izzyihaveaverywarpedsenseofhumorthatmaybethereasonforallthis
ontheotherhandimaybetestingyalltoseewhohassomekindofskillat
translatingdifficulttextsintothecommontonguewhileretaining
theintentandcontextoftheoriginalshallinowbeginpostingingreek
jeffthesickandtwistedhumorist
- Original Message
youmightsaythatontheotherhanditsgreattoseethatsomeoneistryingtodeciphertextandfindmeaningto
thejumblehoweverthisisnoteasyasihavetoperformmyownspellcheckthetranslatingisuptoyou
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, D
"And do you want to talk about the courage of your
convictions? Stand up in the Coliseum, as many a Christian did, and cry out
"This is wrong," knowing that in the very act you will surely be
the next to be fed to the lions. No! To love your enemy is not to
rebel against his authority but to
David, I will forego answering your questions,
as I am very willing to let you have the LAST word on this, a non-response from
me being the only way I can see of that ever actually happening :>) I will
clarify one point, however, and that is that I am not condemning Telemachus'
actions, nor
actually,
it seems relativly minor, but certainly calld attn to a deadly
scandal, to God in the real Temple (not made with hands)
exertg His will at that time upon their closd
'temple' society
e.g.,
lookg at the primary 'legal evidnce' at JCs
'trial/s', they argud that he claimed the st
In a message dated 12/4/2004 8:44:51 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy seems to have been taught
by the same teacher as I have on this subject of friendship. I'm glad
somebody on this forum understands me.
Me too -- otherwise you would be all alone. By the way - your
In a message dated 12/4/2004 7:58:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bill writes:
Yes, he was. The question, as I have come to see it, is, did he reject his Lord and Savior? I don't know. Where did Saul get his fervor? "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?"
Bill
Wright
Izzy wrote:
David, I believe, is simply stating that he doesnât
want you to agree with him (take his side) motivated
by friendship. He wants you to stand for truth regardless
of personalities. Itâs that simple. That means you should
not expect to be rewarded by the person with whom you
agreed, bu
In a message dated 12/4/2004 8:29:21 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cool. Be sure to check out one of the earliest "Early Church Fathers,"
Barnabas. :-)
Who?
J
John Smithson wrote:
At least this line of logic (pure as it might be) offers
the Smithmeister a reason, for the first time, to delve
into the works of these "Fathers>"
Cool. Be sure to check out one of the earliest "Early Church Fathers,"
Barnabas. :-)
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
---
I
guess I missed the point.
-Original Message-From: Slade
HensonSent: Friday, 03 December, 2004 21.11Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Toward a (biblical) Unilateral Covenant
Slade's paraphrase (with help from Aland and
Stern):
God shows no partiality: for those who-are-wi
Original [Greekified] Text:
Sixyouhavenosenseofhumorizzy.
Translation:
Six Youh Ave.:
no[n]sense of Hum or Izzy.
Commentary:
Six Youh
Ave: Quite naturally, the author is
telling about the inhabitants of a specific location on some God-forsaken
street in a city called Olymp
Hi Bill. Thanks for the informative response. For the most
part, I think we are in agreement. There are a few areas where we differ,
so here are some points of clarification:
1. You never answered my question about whether the use of force is
appropriate in the situation of protecting y
I'm at InnGlory going through the abbreviations,
thinking someone needs to add one to the list, when out of the BLUE (get it?
blue letters?) it hits me . . .
Never mind.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Bill Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December
disregard--not sure
how this got postd--sorry
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 20:46:59 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
HUH?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:11
PM
Subje
I sure
hope so.
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Trapped in the Flag
Slade, Bill, whoever
-- was Gamaliel saved?J
HUH?
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:11
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing
down?
ftr, i think the author prov
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:58:46 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT
In a message dated 12/4/2004 7:30:48 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The short answer, and key word here, is "was." Would you like the long(er) answer?
Bill
Never mind my questioned response. I missed the "Yes he was."
John
The short answer, and key word here, is "was."
Would you like the long(er) answer?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 8:12
PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
I know I
In a message dated 12/4/2004 7:26:09 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FTR, Re: Gen 15, i think the writr appears to 'break' more naturally at the end of verse 6; vs. 7, at least up to vs. 17, seems to be of a literary piece, perhaps inc 18ff., as below
this means an argumnt
FTR, Re: Gen 15, i
think the writr appears to 'break' more naturally at the end of verse 6;
vs. 7, at least up to vs. 17, seems to be of a literary piece,
perhaps inc 18ff., as below
this means an
argumnt for the unity of meanng in 1-6 and 7- 17, inc/not inc 18f.,
isn't out of the questi
ftr, i think the author prov
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:58:46 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT, The
ensuing speculatg abt v. 17 (Gen 15), refd below, may be correct--it
could be abt a unilatrl deal beyond litrl 'descendants'; howevr, the
'diaolog' in Gen 15:18 may have nothing to do w
In a message dated 12/4/2004 7:03:11 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, he was. The question, as I have come to see it, is, did he reject his Lord and Savior? I don't know. Where did Saul get his fervor? "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?"
Bill
Now - I do have a prob
This notion that Paul writes in a narrative style as opposed to a theological systems view, could not be any other way. At least as I think of it. I mean, just imagine how a letter to Corinth or Ephesus may have come about -- just from a practical view. You can see Paul perhaps pacing back
ftr, i think the author prov
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 19:58:46 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BT, The
ensuing speculatg abt v. 17 (Gen 15), refd below, may be correct--it
could be abt a unilatrl deal beyond litrl 'descendants'; howevr, the
'diaolog' in Gen 15:18 may have nothing to do w
I know I’m going to regret asking
the obvious question here, but Bill, how does one have the possibility of being
“saved” if he has rejected his Lord and Savior? Izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Taylor
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
From WorldNetDaily.com:
Church ladies go
topless in pews
Posted: December 4, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com
In Battle Creek, Mich.,
14 women of St. Thomas Episcopal Church – between ages 55 and 82 –
actually bared their breasts to raise money for breast c
BT, The
ensuing speculatg abt v. 17 (Gen 15), refd below, may be correct--it could
be abt a unilatrl deal beyond litrl 'descendants'; howevr, the 'diaolog' in
Gen 15:18 may have nothing to do with it--v.18 may be anothr
'deal' involvg just Abe's litrl 'descendants', a deal which is
actually
Yes, he was. The question, as I have come to see
it, is, did he reject his Lord and Savior? I don't know. Where did Saul get his
fervor? "Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?"
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday,
In a message dated 12/4/2004 6:57:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Perhaps because Farley looks a little like me."
Oh man, you've done it now! I will never get this image out of my head :>)
Bill
:-) Tell me I fantasize !! Plase !!!
Johnny Boy
"Perhaps because Farley looks a little like
me."
Oh man, you've done it now! I will never get
this image out of my head :>)
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 7:52
PM
Subject: Re: [Tr
In a message dated 12/4/2004 6:40:22 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the law of God is not sin. The law is holy and good. There is,
however, a law of sin and death that works within our physical bodies. That
was what we were talking about when I was referring to the "T
Sixyouhavenosenseofhumorizzy.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Outside of the Cup
izzythanksfortheadviceithasbeennotedhoweverthishasnotb
In a message dated 12/4/2004 6:02:46 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Slade, I fully agree with you. I am not sure how I failed to communicate this, but thank you for clearing it up. Each one of Jesus' teachings in the "Sermon" was first a transforming initiative, given not onl
Smithson checks in with the favorite movie list:
Black Rain -- I have seen this perhaps 7 or 8 times.
Jeremiah Johnson -- actually my number one movie. I identify with the character and
would prefer to live and die in the back woods of the high country.
Tommy Boy -- Perhap
Wrong border, Jeff.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
4:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
solancewouldthatmakegodawetbackpardonthesickhumorijustcannot
In a message dated 12/4/2004 5:20:43 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reading these emails of your, Jeff, is like reading the original texts of the Greek
Marlin wrote:
Do you think that the law is sin?
No, the law of God is not sin. The law is holy and good. There is,
however, a law of sin and death that works within our physical bodies. That
was what we were talking about when I was referring to the "Torah of sin"
using Slade's terminology.
Slade, I fully agree with you. I am not
sure how I failed to communicate this, but thank you for clearing it up.
Each one of Jesus' teachings in the "Sermon" was first a transforming
initiative, given not only to intensify the effects of the Law (thank you, John)
for those without ears to he
Very
good post, Mr. Bill T.
I
enjoy and share your understanding of the historical context. The however I
have is not a however in disagreement but one of semantics. You say Yeshua was
silent regarding angariaverit, but I say He did have a commentary on the
subject: Go with him an extra m
Alright, my favorite movies:
Number 1 -- The Christmas Story. I've seen it a million times and still love
it: the flag pole, the temperamental furnace, the Red Rider BB-gun, the
soap, so much going on.
Number 2 -- Sandlot. For a lot the same reasons. The swimming
pool-mock-drowning scene is one of
Reading these emails of your, Jeff, is like reading the original texts of
the Greek Papyri... no punctuation or spaces.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Jeff
PowersSent: Saturday, 04 December, 2004 18.48To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]S
no doubt, Bill
(I've been catchin' up on some of your input); e.g., the hypd historcl
rebellion of biblicl blessing-seekers simultaneously
categorically cursing (castg out) the indigenous occupant-obstacles [as CPs
'1667' doc (already 75 posts ago:) also enlightns..]
On Sat, 4 Dec 2004 16:
why America is not blessed:
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:43:59 -0700 "Bill Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..blessings are in
Christ
izzythanksfortheadviceithasbeennotedhoweverthishasnotbeenaproblem
oneiliketobehonestfromthestarttwoifiwastotryinternetdatingiwoulnot
changeathingthreeihavenoproblemgettingadatefourtakemeforwhoiam
orsaygoodbyeitreallydoesnotmattertomeiseethebeautyinsidethecup
nothingelseexceptgodmattersfivethatst
David, you assert that Jesus' words in Matthew 5.39
("But I tell you not to resist an evil person. But whoever slaps you on your
right cheek, turn the other to him also") do not apply in our discussion
concerning submitting to governing authorities. I would like to point out to you
(for the
In a message dated 12/4/2004 2:42:26 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
eHa -- I's on a roll. By the wave, years agao, while in my 30's, I had something to do with install many miles of sewer, strom drain and water.
JD
whew !!! maybe I should slow down just a bit !
In a message dated 12/4/2004 2:38:37 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
amenbrother
eHa -- I's on a roll. By the wave, years agao, while in my 30's, I had something to do with install many miles of sewer, strom drain and water.
JD
andithoughtiwasnearlyalonethanksjohn
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004
23:35
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
In a message dated 12/3/2004 8:07:27 PM Pacific
Standard Tim
amenbrother
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004
22:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
In a message dated 12/3/2004 7:11:49 PM Pacific
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
attaboyjohnafterbuildingwastewatersystemsfortwentyyears
iveseenthesamething
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004
22:25
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
In a message dated 12/3/20
In a message dated 12/4/2004 2:04:12 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
J, you may well be in the practice of maligning the very people who do this type of thing. Izzy
how so
J
Ask the Holy Spirit.
You wrote it -- the Holy Spirit doesn't even know. I asked. So
hemightbewewillknowintime
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004
14:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
so
you're ! the one (..currently seatd in Moses'
seat) g>
On F
In a message dated 12/4/2004 1:55:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Linda Shields posts some thoughts not received by me except in this post from Lance.
Are you "pro-wife?" Would you do nothing to provide and protect her and her honor? Do you really think that my "pro
Do you think that the law is sin
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing down?
> David Miller wrote:
> > I had asked in that post if Slade
solancewouldthatmakegodawetbackpardonthesickhumorijustcannot
helpittoday
jeff
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
13:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
Happily, Jesus is 'pro-David'
Izzy's nomination for Funniest Movie:
"Dirty, Rotten Scoundrels"
with Steve Martin.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Movie List!
In a message dated 12/4/2004 12:10:29 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am. That's why I'm saving the eight bucks.
That's money better spent on... say...
Romans and the People of God N. T. Wright
(Since I can't find Romans in a Week)
What Saint Paul Really Said N. T
thatsbecausekayhasnotasteinmoviesandstillmissesthesubtlehumorofthismovie
formeilovethejewishunderpinningsofthenativesitsthefunniestmovieithinkieversaw
thenilikpiratesofthecarribean1941shaneoldyellerandfiddlerontherooftonameafew
jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECT
-Original Message-
iamtattooedpiercedwithfiveearringsinoneearismokeenjoywineandbeeramdirtpoorandabitoverweight
jeff
Jeff, that’s all fine and good with
me, but take my advice and keep
It to yourself when it comes to internet
dating. J
Iz
Your perception is amazing! :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Outside of the Cup
Let me guess: it's the 'being often wrong' upon whi
LOL! How so?
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
3:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
'Piling on' Ten yard penalty.Wait a sec that was agregious
'piling on' ma
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
3:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
In a message dated 12/4/2004 11:40:06 AM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the Flag
Autonomy? Individualism? Both are celebrated in your 'documents'.
Neith
thankyouverymuchdavidienjoyedthisgreatlyitsinterrestingthattheoutsides
thatyoudescribedareveryrealtomeinfactyoursecondparagraphisaverygood
descriptionofmeinallaspectsexceptthelonghairsowhatdoithinkofthispost
bravomyfriendverywellwrittenandbythewayyoumightwanttobealittlemore
explicitinthefutureithin
Oh, well.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
2:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
Possible? Of course. Likely? I think not.
- Original Message
Let me guess: it's the 'being often wrong' upon which we agree?
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: December 04, 2004 16:48
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The Outside of the Cup
> Something upon which we can agree. :-) Iz
>
> -Origin
(Look who’s talking—Sir Lancelot
himself.) J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
2:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] American
Indians
Charm school? Are you kidding me? When it come
'Piling on' Ten yard penalty.Wait a sec that was
agregious 'piling on' make that 25 yards.
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 04, 2004 16:41
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The
Schizophrenic God
Izzy in
blue:
Of course I remember how the
J (You’d hate my neighborhood! Try men
with purses? I draw the line at
the high heels, myself.) Iz
I could have bought the whole package, but you had to put in the guy
with the ear ring. :-)
Terry
--
Something upon which we can agree. :-) Iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Outside of the Cup
My initial response is to celebrate that w
Izzy in blue:
Of course I remember how the Lord used you to defend me in a
very similar
misunderstanding involving other people. However, if you were doing this
because you were "pro-David Miller," that would have been an
inappropriate
motive.
Now you tell me !! It is
painf
In a message dated 12/4/2004 11:40:06 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
J, you may well be in the practice of maligning the very people who do this type of thing. Izzy
how so
J
-Original Message-
Our joy is seeing others
prosper and getting out those wrinkles that they had always considered
to be
trivial and unimportant.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
Matt 23:8 "But (9) do not be called
(10) Rabbi; for One is your Teacher, and you are
Possible? Of course. Likely? I think not.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 04, 2004 15:03
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
What if we are just
more perceptive than you imagine, and both read the
Yikes. I've been 'outed' (no play on words
now).
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 04, 2004 15:09
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
Another unbeliever.
J
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Autonomy? Individualism? Both are celebrated in your 'documents'. Neither is
compatible with the gospel.
- Original Message -
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: December 04, 2004 15:06
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the Flag
> I think the basic a
Charm school? Are you kidding me? When it comes to
this ya got everyone on TT beat hands down. Remember, Linda, I can read between
lines. You are a charmer par excellent.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 04, 2004 15:00
S
I believe the 'thrust' of this post had more to do
with 'compassion fatigue' than with what you wrote on.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: December 04, 2004 15:02
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped in the
Flag
I resigned f
No one hates David Miller more than g, I
believe. This has never changed in the many years I have been on TT. You can
always count on him to come out and strike at any opportunity. (He’s just
about as fond of me.) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
David Miller wrote:
I've been reflecting recently about our differing perspectives of one
another here on TruthTalk. We have people on the list from various
backgrounds. As many of you know, cleaning the outside of the cup is
not as important as the inside of the cup. The Pharisees cleaned th
Thanks, Perry. This is one of the documents our family enjoys reading when
we are blessed enough to be together over Thanksgiving. I also remember
reading something by Lincoln. Izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent:
It’s a bargain to understand God’s
plan in founding America (in which YOU reside.) Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
10:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
I am. That's why I'm saving the eight bucks.
That's money better spent on... say...
Romans and the People of God N. T. Wright
(Since I can't find Romans in a Week)
What Saint Paul Really Said N. T. Wright
-- slade
-Original Message-
From: Lance Muir
Are you unfamiliar
Another unbeliever. J
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Trapped
in the Flag
Please allow me to back up and, take another run at this.The
con
I think the basic argument here is not whether the Founders were all perfect
Christians, but rather what was the intent of the Constitution and founding
documents regarding God and Christianity. I believe that anyone who has read
those documents w/o blinders on can see that they assumed that both w
What if we are just more perceptive than
you imagine, and both “read the heart of the writer” and understand
what his real underlying agenda is—and reject it? Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004
5:37 AM
I resigned from the Salvation Army women’s
auxiliary after they compromised in San
Francisco on the gay issues. I found it showed a
basic flaw in what was most important to them; money over principle. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance M
Indeed, David, language is a blunt instrument.The word 'religion' is one
worth spending some time on.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: December 03, 2004 23:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The role of religion in a secular society
>
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] American Indians
Do you remember which observation of mine you deemed to most perceptive
I'd
made on TT (something like 'only those who really 'get it do
it')? Keep
that in mind vis a vis yourself and David Miller. You've both shared
from
your lives. Davi
My initial response is to celebrate that which is of the Spirit of God in
these anecdotes. He knows. I don't.
My secondary response: I have a 'sense' that you, David, are much occupied
with the 'outside of the cup'.That's just me and, I am often wrong.
- Original Message -
From: "David
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
