WHY AREN'T YOU JUST AS CONCERNED ABOUT THE HERETIC
HUNTERS AS YOU ARE ABOUT THE OCCULTIC TYPE FANTASY FOLK?
Lance answers Judy
I am MUCH MORE CONCERNED ABOUT THE HERETIC HUNTERS
as the latter are not heretics, Judy.
Lance ansks himself: Who are the HERETIC
HUNTERS?
Lance answers himse
I truly wish you could see this ,Dave, because it is important to our
understanding. The tree was there for a reason. God could have
programmed every creature to behave exactly as He wanted them to, but
He did not. He even gave angels a choice. He wants us to come to Him
out of love, just as
Bottom line Lance is Jesus' criteria for knowing the
Truth (Himself) is
When we abide in Him and HIS WORDS abide in us - is
when we will know the Truth and
the truth will make us free .
Rather than when we know a little bit about Him and mix
it with pagan folklore and
mystery religions
It is not that He can not do. It is that he will not do. God does not speak thru profane persons such as Cain & Esau. In fact he calls them names as in "PROFANE" Though he cried Esau was REJECTED! details in the HOLY BIBLE Nobody is railing against the grace of God. God offered his gr
I won't speculate, Dave, but I should point out that monkeys and horses
do not have a soul.
==
Dave Hansen wrote:
He knew they would sin. He did not plan
for them to fall. He planned a remedy for the fall. Big difference.
Lance I don't make your opinions my problem so why is
what I write your problem?
You won't ever have to answer to anyone for it. I
am responsible for what I speak/write.
Why arn't you just as concerned about the heretic
hunters as you are about the occultic
type fantasy folk? jt
On Thu,
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:42:37 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Even the one 'infallible interpreter' on TT has taken issue
with your Scriptural interpretation(s) on occasion(s).
Many have taken exception to your
non-personalist hermeneutic.
What in the world is thi
So there was NO Autumn Equinox in 1824? 1825? 1826? 1827? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Blainerb: Not only was your author wrong as to the ruler of Capricorn, he implies that the autumn equinox falls on the 22 of September every year of the four years Joseph Smith went to the hill to meet with th
Please explain? Who called who
this?
Apparently he does not see it. He is unable to DEAL with issues & only attacks PEOPLE who raise issues. So don't let it get to you. Just be glad he has not yet called you a IDIOT, JEW PUNK etc. When he calls someone a name it is only "designed to help" them! Christine Miller <[EMAIL PROTECT
Judy: You made it YOUR problem when you stated that
he did not know the Lord. (I don't think you even employed an IMO). Why not, at
the very least, give us an "IMO'?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.
Even the one 'infallible interpreter' on TT has
taken issue with your Scriptural interpretation(s) on occasion(s). Many have
taken exception to your non-personalist hermeneutic. Many take exception to your
sacred/secular dichotomy. Many take exception over your dualism/gnosticism. Many
take
WOW you know a lot about that stuff are you an OCCULTIST? What was with the sacrifice of a Black sheep? The Author is D M Quinn He is a commited Mormon. He is a Professor at BYU from the publisher:In this ground-breaking book, D. Michael Quinn masterfully reconstructs an earlier age, fi
OK - You go first
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:32:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Are the PERSONS on TT suggesting that that which
they say is not embodied truth? J
ust say so so that we may factor that in when
reading you.
That is not my problem (what you think); it is entirely
between you and the one you serve.
My responsibility is to walk in good conscience toward
the Lord and others.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:30:48 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Honestly Judy, just SOMETIMES!
Now, back
Your games don't work with people who actually think and walk upright at the same time. You are playing games THIRD REQUEST Show us where I called CSL "EVIL" Show us the substance of the problem with what I posted. Or STOP Putting your FALSE ALLEGATIONS in my mouth! This is the only w
Are the PERSONS on TT suggesting that that which
they say is not embodied truth? Just say so so that we may factor that in when
reading you.
Honestly Judy, just SOMETIMES!
Now, back to the matter at hand; IFF you are wrong
concerning JRRT & CSL (according to some on TT) then, what are we to think
concerning that which we read of you hereafter?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglo
Are you up to being able to separate the holy from the
profane yourself Lance?
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 07:17:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Quoting Judy Taylor: He (God) says that only
those who know how to separate the holy from the profane can be his
mouthpieces. Th
Again you choose to personalize? Are you attacking my caracter? Why would God allow a "Devil" into heaven?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 19:40:57 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [Truth
Lance, it may be wise for you to check the
archives before making these wild accusations.
It's not me doing the painting. It is
you who have me in a corner of your mind labelled
"fundamentalist"
And you ascribe to me all of the beliefs in your
"fundamentalist" card file.
As per the issue
Quoting Judy Taylor: He (God) says that only those
who know how to separate the holy from the profane can be his mouthpieces. They
(JRRTY & CSL) were not speaking for Him (God).
IMO JUDY YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO SEPARATE THE HOLY
FROM THE PROFANE! Applying the same logic to you as you applied
OK Judy! Having painted yourself in a corner, just
make yourself comfortable. I'll watch your posts in future for use of the word
'HELL'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 0
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:44:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Judy said'For the record, I don't believe that C. S. Lewis
actually knew the Lord'
Lance, having made an incorrect leap in logic,due to a
belief that Judy believed that persons who die while not knowin
I don't eat rabbit.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 08, 2005 06:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Putting people
down
How would you know how DavidM loves his wife
Lance
Judy said'For the record, I don't believe that C.
S. Lewis actually knew the Lord'
Lance, having made an incorrect leap in logic,due
to a belief that Judy believed that persons who die while not knowing the
Lord (Lewis is dead), go to hell, thought she'd so consigned him. I suspect that
t
How would you know how DavidM loves his wife
Lance? Isn't this putting your opinion out there a bit?
I don't think he has shared his whole mind on this
matter exhaustively - do you? Also his priorities are
definitely not mainstream. So why is he the
subject here?
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:
Yes Lance, I do appreciate your concern
But I have yet to consign the first person to hell -
it's all in your too vivid imagination.
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 06:19:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Your DISCERNMENT ON THIS MATTER (who knows, maybe
a few other matters also) is
My rather ill-formed point Judy, had more to do
with David's errant 'take' and the male/female thingy. He and, others who
espouse such errant thinking/teaching are somewhat accountable for the very
issues they rail against.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: Tru
Your DISCERNMENT ON THIS MATTER (who knows, maybe a
few other matters also) is wide of the mark. I've occasionally drawn a
comparison between yourself and David Miller on this discernment thingy, Judy.
Do take care won't you, Judy, in consigning persons to
Hell?
Your fault if you don't know her mother's name Lance. David has mentioned
it on TT before. I know it.
Also why would they be talking about her when they are so ridiculed and
maligned? I don't notice you saying
a whole lot about your wife on this list either and I certainly would not
know her
Lance why don't you trying employing the "words of God"
with the WORD OF GOD
sometime and give us an example of the "real thing" IYO
of course. jt
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:41:25 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IFF one (mis)cites Scripture with the intention
of speaking for
Lance my goodness, this looks more like a morning rant
than morning musings ... sigh!
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:30:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Forever rail against the graciousness of this selfsame
God?
Who is railing? Taking His Own Words seriously
is hardly
It may have been the 'lost in the suffle thingy,
Dave. Did you not see my specific questions concerning your clarification
re:A&E from a distinctly Mormon perspective. I GENUINE BELIEVE THAT SOME ON
TT MAY BE UNAWARE JUST HOW DIFFERENTLY YOU VIEW 'god's lineage'!! I'm not
suggesting deceptio
Perhaps when her mind and the MIND OF GOD are more
in sinc; having built upon this foundation layed for her by her mom (someone
almost never mentioned by either her or her dad..strangely) she will then be
spoken to more frequently as Christine and, not David's daughter. (I'd mention
you mom'
DaveH writes:
FWIW.While it may be noble to want to keep one's children
pure and innocent, a loving parent who overly protects their children
will end up with kids acutely susceptible to the ills of the world.
Not necessarily; being over protective through fear is
one thing. Teac
IFF one (mis)cites Scripture with the intention of
speaking for God, what is it that one has done?
Perhaps one who only/always cites/interprets
without error can enlighten us?
When all of us stand before God at the great white
throne judgment... we have to know where we failed. Noone
will have grounds to accuse Him of
being unloving or unjust because we will have condemned ourselves and
we will know this without anyone having to tell us... So the test is for us
Forever rail against the graciousness of this
selfsame God?
Judy & Kevin wish to inform us what God can't
do through Lewis & Tolkien (in print or on film). Y'all ought to read Linda
Shield's observations. Amen Linda!
David, Christine, Judy and Linda rail against
feminism, absolving the b
I sure don't wonder at this Christine,
Whenever you post JD makes allusions to your age, like
he is the old man full of wisdom and you are
just the novice who still has to learn; do you
sometimes feel like you are being diss'd?
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:11:05 -0800 (PST) Christine Miller <[EMAIL
101 - 140 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
