Dave, sounds like you'er still a little sore for getting booted off of TT for continuing a banned topic. Old news...move on.
I also think your concept of free speech is a little twisted. Free speech laws apply in a public forum, but TT is not a public forum. It is a private discussion group. T
You TT'rs are posting at a much faster rate than I can follow with my
limited time during the week to moderate. So, please help me out...if you
see what you believe is an ad hominem, even if it does not involve you, feel
free to forward the email to me privately. I will follow up as I best I c
Dean, you may think I am city folk, but I grew up in Kentucky and used to hunt groundhogs. My grandmother would gut the groundhogs and slide an appropriate sized piece of cedar into the groundhog, bake it for a bout 4 hours, then throw away the roundhog and we'd eat the cedar! In fact, she had a d
Commonality of coon-paws is not the issue...just so the shiny object just barely fits into the hole...then the tiniest of paws would not be able to remove the object. Try it...drop a piece of fruit, like an apple (with no stem) into a mason jar...one that it just fits...then try to take it out wit
David, you are right. The example I recall was putting fruit in a jar with monkeys. Once they grabbed the fruit, they could not get the fruit and their hand out of the jar, and refused to let go. I was playing a bit with Dean.
Perry
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Reply-To: TruthTalk
6 07:39:03 -0500
>
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Date: 1/8/2006 9:03:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] TO ALL TT"S
> >
> > Dean, I was wondering. How do you put something in a
Dean, I was wondering. How do you put something in a hole that is larger
than the hole?
From: "Dean Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] TO ALL TT"S Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:39:35 -0500
In the Mountains of Wes
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
... cult-apostles like DavidM...
Gary, your calling DM a "cult-apostle" is a direct attack on him. He does
not claim to be an apostle, and adding "cult" to that erroneous label makes
it an ad-hominem reference. I encourage you to retract that ad-hominem
reference and
Perry wrote:
Dave, in your temple ceremony, who does it depict Satan paying to preach
his message?
Then Dean wrote:
A Baptist Preacher/Pastor as JD is.
Then John wrote:
Looking for that explanation, Dean. Looked like an insult to me a
really agressive one, at that.
Now, Perry co
In your opinion, is it also possible to espouse/articulate a false jesus,
and experience a false jesus?
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Subject: [TruthTalk] TIME WELL WASTED - Slogan of the comedy channel
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 06:55:37 -0500
P
Blaine, do you consider protestants to be pagans?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Mormonism & Freemasonry
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:06:52 EST
No doubt about it, those ancient groups were doing bad stuff, fe
te me exactly, then don't pretend to quote me at all by putting
words in my mouth. FTRI have much more respect for Protestants
than you will ever imagine, and as such I certainly have more respect for
Protestants than I do for those who misquote me.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
J
al message --
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John, there is a higher level division amongst the mormons...they call
> everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile". "Protestants" are just one
> detestable group of pagans in the group of "
mparison of the preApostate First Church?
jd
-- Original message ------
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John, there is a higher level division amongst the mormons...they call
> everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile". "Protestan
son of the preApostate First Church?
jd
-- Original message --
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John, there is a higher level division amongst the mormons...they call
> everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile". "Protestants&qu
ou are right in
your statement of the use of the word "gentile."
do you know of any websites , by Mormons , that give an outline of the
Church suitable for comparison of the preApostate First Church?
jd
-- Original message ------
From: "Charles Perry Locke"
John, there is a higher level division amongst the mormons...they call
everyone who is not a mormon a "gentile". "Protestants" are just one
detestable group of pagans in the group of "gentiles".
Doesn't it seem interesting that DaveH finds such intrique with a pagan
group like the "protest
You tell us, John. How many times have you heard that from the right
wingers?
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org, TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Unsubscribe please
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 23:13:32 +
How
e.
Did my second effort make it any easier to comprehend, Perry?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, you response does not appear to have anything at all to do with the
question. *Do you mind giving it a second try? *
"will you tell us the mormon interpretation (or, at the very least
.
/*I will need Biblical references, as in book, chapter, and verse of
course"*/
DAVEH: Were you too lazy to look it up? Mk 16:16
FWIWthis Bible browser works very well...
http://www.hti.umich.edu/k/kjv/
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Your diatribe below is ful
I meant to address the response below to "Dave".
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:39:27 -0800
David,
I will
ually saw AND FELT the prints of the nails.
Once that happened, no excuses by the government, or guards or anybody
could overrule the fact that they had seen and talked to the Risen Christ.
I just don't think the empty sepulcherwhich we know meant he had
risen.....had (or would ha
David, I see your point...I, too, beleive that the cross is central, but
still, without the resurrection the gospel would have been meaningless.
Preaching would have been in vain...faith would have been in vain.
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To
David wrote:
Perry wrote:
> David, Paul says it best: 1 Cor 1:22-25;
> 2:1-2; 15:12-18.
Your first two passages speak of him CRUCIFIED and not a word about his
resurrection.
In Paul's mention of the crucifixion, the resurrection was implicit. Many
were crucified, why would Jesus' be any dif
I used to be bothered by the use of "CE" instead of "AD" until I realized
that it can also mean "Christian Era". However, I still prefer and use "AD".
Wikipedia: "Common Era, Current Era, or Christian Era (this year is 2006
CE)."
Merriam-Webster: "chemical engineer, civil engineer, Christian
David, Paul says it best: 1 Cor 1:22-25; 2:1-2; 15:12-18.
After saying many times that he would be raised on the third day, had He not
been, He would have been proven a false prophet. All that He taught would
have been nullified. There would be no gospel (1 Cor 15:12-18). After all,
isn't the
ed, which is the case now as it was in Jesus'
time. We do not have record of our Lord performing baptisms, yet he set
the example by being baptized himself. Why would we expect Paul (or
latter-day apostles) to be any different?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave, *will you tell us the mo
enough for you to google each one that you want to reference.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
/*Is it that you know Paul preached something that is not in the Bible?
*/
DAVEH: Yes, I do think so.
Dave, *what did Paul preach that is not in the Bible? I will need Biblical
referen
st want to understand
why you made it, and what you meant by it.
I think it is pretty clear...my statement merely sunmmarizes the scriptures
I cited.
So, after you have taken the time to read the references in context, if you
then do not agree, please let me know where we differ.
Perry
Dave, will you tell us the mormon interpretation (or, at the very least,
your interpretation) of the following verse? Exactly what is Paul trying to
say here?
1 cor 9:14 In the same way, the Lord has commanded that those who preach the
gospel should receive their living from the gospel.
Than
/*Is it that you know Paul preached something that is not in the Bible? */
DAVEH: Yes, I do think so.
Dave, what did Paul preach that is not in the Bible? I will need Biblical
references, as in book, chapter, and verse of course. :-)
Perry
--
"Let your speech be always with grace
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
/*The gospel didn't even have POWER until he was rose from the dead. */
DAVEH: Wow! I'd never heard that before, Perry. Is that something you
just made up, or is that commonly believed by many Christians?
Dave, I take it you do not believe that statement, t
g that is not in the Bible?
I am missing your point, Dave...can you be a bit more explicit?
Perry
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
I am going to pull a "G" here and augment my own post...
Below is a reference to a page that begins to discuss some of the tests
of canonici
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*The operative point in our discussion is not that Christians would or
would not welcome new revelation...*
DAVEH: To me, it is a very pertinent point. You made the claim, and from
my experience it is not a claim I've heard any Christians previously make.
http://answers.org/theology/add_to_scripture.html
Perry
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:34:43 -0800
Dave,
Adding to the wor
G, "bad" is not a verb, so the infinitive form "to bad" does not work here.
:-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Unsubscribe please
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 12:08:36 -0700
to bad he didn't pursue that option
So, Terry, you are running a non-prophet business?
From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:34:25 -0600
Dave wrote:
DAVEH: As I understand DavidM,
ve as you suggestedit should be easy for you to provide evidence,
Perry. Otherwise, I can only assume you are grinding your ax against
Mormonism.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* It is not additional revelation that we object to, per se, and _many_
(if not most) Christians feel that if it
Mary?
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:56:53 -0800
DAVEH: Thank you for your straight forward answer on this, Perry. Is
there another contrasting source that would suggest the age of 14, as is
implied in Izzy's post.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
In an early writing (c. AD 150) called "The
In an early writing (c. AD 150) called "The Proto-Gospel of James", Mary was
betrothed at 12, and became pregnant with Jesus at 16. ("Lost Scriptures",
by Bart D. Ehrman. Oxford University Press, Inc. NY 2003).
From: Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTa
Dave,
It is not additional revelation that we object to, per se, and many (if
not most) Christians feel that if it is in God's will, additional revelation
would be welcome. And to many, additional personal revelation is accepted.
Many of us believe that the gospel of Jesus Christ is compl
Terry,
Maybe you are speaking from experience, but I believe that cold turkey is
the way to go. You have to cut and run and not look back. Sure, there will
be withdrawals. The habit of sitting down to check your email and
immediately looking for TT posts will be difficult to break. But with a
ke' if it makes you feel better, I'm not even a
Mormon, Perry. Why be such a nuisance? Move on! David is, IMO, & on some
occasions, a pompous ass. Should you find him to be otherwise then, good
for you!
- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EM
t to, Perry. Remember, I watched the 'extended
version' of the conversation between yourself and the 'annointed one' on
Scripture. He simply cannot acknowledge wrongheadedness.
- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
30 Dec 2005 13:36:30 -0500
I'd rather David did it, Perry. He knows which is which. One wearies of his
pompous treatment of his 'subjects' on TT.
- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: December 30, 2005 13:23
Subj
Lance, you may be right, but please separate the biblical from the
speculation in David's post so the rest of us can see it as you do.
Perry
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] apostles and prophets
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 200
Terry,
Well said. The wages of sin is death, and since Jesus paid the price for
our sins, it is his death that paid that price...not the stress He felt in
Gethsemene, as great as it was. If that were so, the billions of animals
that have been sacrificed by the Jews in in ages past for thier
Blaine, I beg to differ.
I have read two books, side by side, one of the Mormon temple endowment,
and one of Freemasonry, and the similarities are unmistakable, from the the
clothing and anointing to the secret grips, tokens, and penalties. Add to
this the fact that JS was himself a mason o
their
particular priorities & purpose/s
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005 10:12:08 -0800 "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gary, your statement seems to imply that you believe that killing in
combat is murder.
>Is that you belief?
||
--
"Let your spe
, was for the one you responded to namely, Iz.
- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: December 26, 2005 13:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Real men kill people
Lance, I don't have a husband...I have a wife, and I do not have a
husband killed anyone? How 'bout your relative, the pilot? Sounds
like merit badge of manhood for ya.
- Original Message - From: "Charles Perry Locke"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: December 26, 2005 13:12
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Real men kill people
Gary, your
Gary, your statement seems to imply that you believe that killing in combat
is murder. Is that you belief?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Real men kill people
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:03:27 -0700
real wom
Blaine wrote:
Ahman A name for God, means, Man of Holiness (see Egyptian name of God,
Ammon, or Amon, or Amen--similar?)
Blaine, you have just demonstrated that the god of mormonism is NOT the God
of the bible:
http://www.godchecker.com/pantheon/egyptian-mythology.php?deity=AMUN
http://
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perry wrote:
> I have no reason to believe that the 11 had been baptised prior to
Jesus' appearance to them.
John 3:25-26
(25) Then there arose a question between some of John's disciples and the
Jews about purifying.
(26) And they came unto John, and sa
Dave, thanks for reminding me. I intended to reply to those questions, but
overlooked them in the post.
I have no reason to believe that the 11 had been baptised prior to Jesus'
appearance to them. I have not read in scripture that any of them were. Of
course, there are different types of
d probably a bit more
than you are asking for. Let me draw this up and send it to you privately.
Perry
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:59 PM
Subject:
Comments below:
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perry wrote:
> I beleive the verse about preaching to all creatures to be parenthetical
to the rest of the passage, telling the apostles their commission, but not
changing the subject of his address, namely those whom he had just
up
David wrote:
>Jesus is speaking to the eleven. We agree on this. Verses 16-18 use
>pronouns such as he, they, and them. All of these pronouns in these
verses
>refer to the creatures to whom they preach. We know this because the
>context of his message to the eleven is preaching the gospel
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I don't know if you understand what I am saying, but if you believe that
the
signs also apply to people other than these eleven, why try and make the
argument that this particular text does not? Perhaps if you do read it
this
way, you would be argu
ay that. I
am saying that in v16-20, Jesus is only SPEAKING to the eleven about
themselves, so at this point is speaking of signs that will accompany the
eleven as they go out.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROT
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Perry wrote:
> BTW, Izzy, the Holy Spirit revealed this
> understanding to me.
If this is being said in jest, I caution you like I did John that you
should
be very careful and refrain from this. Remember the commandment not to
take
the Lord's name i
ecideding that what the Holy Spirit told you is the right understanding?
Perry
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides
are baptized?
That does not go for anyone since the apostles? iz
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Perry Locke
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:24 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Who decides
I stated th
to the apostles,
too? izzy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Moore
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 5:54 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Who decides
cd: I agree Perry.
> [Original Message]
> From: Charl
David,
Regarding your item 2, we might also conclude that Jesus was speaking
specifically to the apostles, and that this does not apply to all believers.
The key is to identify the antecedent of "He" in verse 16, which I believe
to exclusively be the apostles.
Perry
David wrote:
2. Mark
An interesting article forwarded to me by a friend:
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/package.jsp?name=fte/notbelieveingod/notbelieveingod&floc=wn-nt
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) htt
For what is is worth, "huzzah" is an old english word that has become
"hurrah" today. I first heard it at a renaissance festival. I think you mean
"Hoo-ha", which is the term Pacino used in "Scent of a Woman".
From: "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
What if you are wrong?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] SO THEN it is safe to assume that NO MORMON
RESPONSE TO THE "...
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:06:25 EST
Most Bishops have so much to do that they have
Blaine, if you and a fellow mormon disagreed on the meaning of a verse, you
would go to your Bishop, he would tell you what it means, and regardless of
the answer, you both would acceot that, am I right? If not, how would you
resolve it?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.inngl
Lance, and all,
I removed Dave from the list entirely until we could resolve the issues
at hand off-line. I suspect he will be returning soon.
Perry the Moderator
From: "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To:
Subject: [TruthTalk] Banning/Shunning not the
Gary,
While I prefer the KJV, I am not a KJV only advocate and believe that the
"crimson thread of salvation" is evident in all of the popular translations,
and all can lead one to salvation. However, when one begins to study the
Bible more deeply, I believe that comparing several translatio
If you are still addressing me, Gary, it is absolutely better to read it.
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Condition of heart of "unregenerate" gentiles
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 01:36:33 -0700
..is it be
I qualified that in a previous post.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Condition of heart of "unregenerate" gentiles
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:36:23 -0700
..mercy me (the same question again,Bro--but did you e
If "they" were, they would be "ex-them".
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Condition of heart of "unregenerate" gentiles
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 00:20:48 -0700
..if so, (we know they ain't classic Protestants,
Gary,
I do not classify who is a Christian and who is not along denominational
lines. Christians are those who are members of the body of Christ. You can
tell when one of "them" becomes a Christian...at the same time they become
an "ex-them".
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Trut
Not really. But, is also depends on the nature of the error. Everyone has
error in their theology, in my opinion. The question in my mind is how much
error is too much error? How far can one get from the true meaning of the
gospel message before they are "outside" of Christianity. While I cannot
Gary wrote,
CPL, Are [Bible] readers *who believe that JC taught that encouraging the
baptism of the HS for the already converted 'sums up the Law and Prophets'*
Christian/s? [asterisks by CPL]
Depends. Were these Bible readers Christians to begin with? I don't think
that having that belie
e two most
likely).
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] sweat
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 23:40:45 -0700
CPL, what's your perspective on (just) this question?
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:48:32 -0800 &quo
Blaine, I honestly believe you are baiting Christians on TT, or else you
truly have not read the Bible.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] sweat
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:36:58 EST
BLOOD is the key word, I t
Blaine, why do you cintinue to comment on a thread that has been banned? No
more posts on this topic, please.
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:12:50 E
Kevin, Blaine this is a banned thread...please move on.
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ** Moderator comment **
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 19:53:48 -0800 (PST)
Can you print the entire context,
Blaine, if you find unbecoming behavior when I have been responding as the
moderator, point it out. However, when not posting as a moderator, I reserve
the right to engage in what Lance might consider "conduct unbecoming" (the
same rights as any other TT'r).
If you think that the moderator s
Blaine,
Please try to separate posts I make that are from my own personal
viewpoint, and statements I make as moderator. You seem to want to mix the
two. If you want to claim that as the moderator I am biased, then please
refer only to items I post as the moderator.
Perry
From: [EMAIL P
Blaine, please don't stir up the pot. You contribute nothing with your
comments. Also, you say below, "[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:", but you have
not included anything I wrote! You must have removed the part I wrote
without removing the attribution. I doubt it was intentional, but please be
car
John and Kevin, stop the name calling. Go private if you wish to continue.
From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:05:32 -0800 (PST)
if you still have that one tooth
Blaine,
Try reading through the NT and replace every occurrence of the word
"cross" with "star". The text becomes meaningless. The cross is a MAJOR part
of the Chrsitian landscape, directly from scripture. It has meaning and
value beyond merely an instrument of death, and is the VERY symbol
Blaine, please don't us ad-hominem arguments or name calling on TT.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] LDS Restoration - BAAL Worship/ Kevin projecting
evil
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 00:47:53 EST
I don't doubt
tian
hypocrisy involving the double standard practiced on TT with regard to
Mormons. Until /you /as the moderator recognize it, why should I
discontinue pointing it out every time it occurs? Is not the TT double
standard an acceptable discussion topic?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Da
Again, Blaine, I point out that the cross is not seen or used as a symbol
for jesus. Do you understand that?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:22:51 EST
In a message dated 12/1
Blaine, you seem to be missing a fine point here. Christians do not use
crosses as a symbol of Jesus, like mormons do with stars and planets. The
cross, to the Christian, is a reminder of the tremendous price that Jesus
paid for our sins. BIG difference.
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
check out these crosses:
http://www.seiyaku.com/customs/crosses/index.html
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Cross
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:39:55 EST
Blainerb: There are quite a few "cross" songs in the L
Is what I mentioned possible, Blaine? If not, tell me why.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Signing off...
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:44:57 EST
In a message dated 12/12/2005 9:53:54 P.M. Mountain Standard Tim
ating factor, yet it seems to be
suppressed when it comes to recognizing
the Christian hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote: Dave,
Please try to refrain from making sexual references, especially false
accuastions. This is not the forum for that? I am sure there are many
discussi
of
hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret password and secret handshake so
Joseph Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. If lucky, you may become
one of his many spirit wives!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mai
when it comes to recognizing the Christian
hypocrisy found here.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Dave,
* Please try to /refrain /from making sexual references, especially
/false accuastions/.* This is not the forum for that? I am sure there are
many discussion forums about sex if that type of discussi
ents, Perry! If not, will we then have another example of
hypocritical Christianity in TT?
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
Just be sure you remember your secret password and secret handshake so
Joseph Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. *If lucky, you may
become one of his many s
Dave, and others, this topic has been banned, so please communicate
privately on it.
From: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Almost(s) & Anti(s)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:02:44 -0800
*Who specifically
Blaine,
All constellations, indeed, all stars in the northern hemisphere "appear"
to rotate around the north star. It truly is the rotation of the earth that
gives that apparent "rotation" of the stars. Why is the Ursa Major being
singled out?
Check out this photo...
http://courses.washin
Just be sure you remember your secret password and secret handshake so
Joseph Smith will allow you entrance into heaven. If lucky, you may become
one of his many spirit wives!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTal
Or are those examples simply Christian traditions that lay no
claim to Biblical validity? Biblical references would be appreciated.
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
I hope you don't mind me intruding on your intrusion. *I would expect
Satan to teach his people to shun the cross...it is the
1 - 100 of 1110 matches
Mail list logo
