h would be our flesh or
"personhood"
The invitation is to become part of
a "new creation" - old things pass away and all things become
new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
John Lennon and
three year olds
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:56 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Imagination
anyone?
Nuff said.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 09, 2006 09:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to
'snakes anyone'?
Thats why Im
non-denominational. It is an irrelevant issue to me. Let those who wish
So who has the truth?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 09, 2006 08:49
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to
'snakes anyone'?
SO
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECT
sus did not come to put a bandaid
on the "old man" which would be our flesh or
"personhood"
The invitation is to become part of
a "new creation" - old things pass away and all things become
new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08
s away and all things become
new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
1. I've no idea as we've never
discussed it over the years we've come to know one
another.
2. 'Personhood' Judy, h
ree year
olds
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:56 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Imagination
anyone?
From:
Judy Taylor
I should have know better than to suggest thinking.
Shame on me! Do you enjoy saying nothing about something?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 09, 2006 08:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Person
There you go refer
The Pentecostal pastors/seminary teachers I
speak with differ over this.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 09, 2006 08:43
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to
'snakes anyone'?
It is one
evidence. Not
ersonality talk
You can then discuss persons to your hearts content.
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm glad we amuse one another. I find
you and Dean embarrassingly funny!
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
To: T
It is apparent to all that I'm no match for such as
Dean, Kevin and, Judy. I'm just not in their league.
Therefore.NO, I'm not leaving! I'd only suggest that you look up
the discussion on the above as it took place in the history of the 'believing
community'. You needn't and,
it is pretty funny
Actually it is hilariousLance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
1. I've no idea as we've never discussed it
over the years we've come to know one another.
2. 'Personhood' Judy, has been discussed at
grea
r felt the
church was interested in who she was as a person.
I told her that the gospel is for
now, not just for eternity; that Jesus came to
redeem our personhood, not just save our souls for
heaven
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:23:49 -0500 "Lance Muir&q
uot; to you,
Bill, David, and John and the old flesh personhood
does not have to be "reckoned dead" - Noone must die
daily. Is this what you are saying?
Along with
the fact that on this issue I have been
"unteachable?"
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:26:29 -0500
One wonders with what frequency the _expression_
'let's get it on' refers to a conversation? Don't you get most of this out of
your system Dean at the dojo? By the by 'master' Dean, just how much of the
Eastern philosophy have you assimilated?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
daid on the "old man"
which would be our flesh or "personhood"
The invitation is to become part of a "new creation"
- old things pass away and all things become new.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:02:08 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes
ully.
Dean Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/8/2006 5:23:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
rnity; that Jesus came to
redeem our personhood, not just save our souls for heaven
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:23:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
- Original Message -
From: John
D Wilson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
aven't answered my query ... What does
"teachable" look like to you? or How do you -
Lance Muir determine whether or not one is
"teachable?"
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 06:13:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
1. I DO NOT BELIEVE t
- Original Message -
From: John D
Wilson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 07, 2006 18:56
Subject: Open door on the journey
I am now in Singapore after a brief
stop over in South Africa with Jonathan and Tracey.
My journey out has been interesting:
First of all a one and a h
your list also. Why do you never respond to questions
and \always seem to defer them
to someone else. Is this your own personal
brand of humility?
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 05:00:31 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
One could not but AMEN that,
7;s actually
spelt 'middle'
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:19:33 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Mainly gibberish with an M[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:15:07 -0500 as "L
ry.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March
08, 2006 08:13
Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of truthtalk?
Can you describe what you call "being teachable"
looks like for us Lance?
O
@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] An Offensive
Gospel.
John Lennon and three year
olds
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:56 -0500 "Lance Muir"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Wow!, a voice of clarity amidst ...who knows what?
Thanks. However Iz, my question actually was 'Is speaking in tongues THE
evidence of having been baptized in/with the Spirit'? In some circles this is
Pentecostal doctrine and, must be signed off on (?) by all
pastors.
- Original Mes
al Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/8/2006 5:34:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
It'd appear that we do all speak English, Dean.
Now, as everyone else has taken, IMO a rather un
he 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
- Original Message -----
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/8/2006 5:33:55 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
How can that (my interp
Talk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 17:36
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/8/2006 5:23:10 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTa
legitimate
just because some ppl disagree with them
Lance? As per your second point. No you don't
understanding my kind of thinking at all; this
is obvious by your responses to same.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:22:55 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
t's
entirety without difficulty for either yourself or any believer?
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:30:14 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
It'd appear that we do all speak English, Dean.
Now, as everyone else has taken, IMO a rather unconvincing
sagree and state that "badmouthing GWB
is a sign of intellectualism or intelligence" if you
want.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:06:59 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This goes back to 'badmouthing GWB is at best
ignorance', Judy.
WB have to do with what I have been
discussing?
As I have noted before - you are forever locked into
the personal
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:11:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I believe GWB to be sincere also.
From: Judy Taylor
The l
y is not on the throne.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:28:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
How could one ask for more than to be present
on a 'chat room' where ppl illustrate the absence of a democratic f
America is not a Democracy
Lance; it is a Democratic Republic - which is good
training because God's Kingdom is not a "Democracy"
either. You should be relieved that the will of
fallen humanity is not on the throne.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:28:53 -0500 "Lance Mui
the US on her flight one
of whom must have been a
disciple of whoever Lance is listening to because he badmouthed GWB
the entire time in a loud voice.
From: Kevin Deegan
SP's are really Secret Agents for GWB!
LOL
Are y
.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 08:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
Can you describe what you call "being teachable" looks like for us
Lance?
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 06:33:12 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
ther because he loves you so much that your old stinkin flesh won't
matter one bit because it has
been subsumed?" (or whatever the word is that
you and Bill use)
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:22:36 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
DH:TT has a NEW P
glory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 07:19
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re:
[TruthTalk] spirit of Hinn
THE other?
"another"
see dictionary for distinction
or do you want more names?
Gordon B Hinckley
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Who, pray tell, is the 'other snake
handler'?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:58
Subject: [Bulk] Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of
Hinn
Just another snake handler and again the proof is in the pudding
t besides the scripture are of GREAT PLAINESS
Where & in what way did I practice what you preach NON ANSWER?
Your mischaracterization is surely not a good tatic on your part if you
really want others to weigh in on the question as you
claim!Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
w
Actually I don't. I've heard him say some pretty
wierd 'inspired' stuff'.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of
Hinn
Do you need
Now to him that is of power to stablish
you according to my gospel, and
the preaching of Jesus
Christ, according to the revelation of the
mystery
BTW what is wrong with preaching Jesus
Christ?
or should we preach SS & Conversion
IFF he (BH) did say that then, he is. I'd like to
hear from DM on this one. He has come to Hinn's defence often.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] spirit of
Hinn
http
rit' of
truthtalk?
John is a SA for GW?Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'm not. John is.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:02
Subject: Re
nglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Addendum to
'snakes anyone'?
Read the verse real slow
And these signs shall follow them that
believe
What is so difficult about plainess of speech?Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
that is of power to stablish you
according to my gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according
to the revelation of the mystery
BTW what is wrong with preaching Jesus
Christ?
or should we preach SS & Conversion at
our evangelistic meetings?
Lance Muir <[
Now to him that is of power to stablish
you according to my gospel, and the
preaching of Jesus Christ,
according to the revelation of the mystery
BTW what is wrong with preaching Jesus
Christ?
or should we preach SS & Conversion at
our evangel
Got gifts?
If you have them, you "SHALL" have ALL Three
Whoso boasteth himself of a false gift is
like clouds and wind without rain.
Maybe this is why someone tried to eliminate the ending of MK
16?
Easy to fake one not easy to fak
avoidance of some questions!!!!
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It'd appear that we do all speak English, Dean.
Now, as everyone else has taken, IMO a rather unconvincing, run at the fg,
may I ask YOU, Dean...Rather than proof-texting (the except
tery
BTW what is wrong with preaching Jesus
Christ?
or should we preach SS & Conversion at our
evangelistic meetings?
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DH:TT has a NEW POPE! You're just going to have
to adjust. IMO your mystification re:SP types ain't
I'm not. John is.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 08, 2006 06:02
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
SP's are really Secret Agents for GWB! LOL
Are you a conspiracy
one not easy to fake the other two.
Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't mind funnin' even at my expense. Why
would I as I've done so often, often myself. However, shall I ask of you,
Iz, whether you believe the Appalachian sn
oore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 18:28
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
- Original Message -----
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/7/2006 5:54:36 AM
Subject:
t' of
truthtalk?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/7/2006 6:04:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
Follow your conscience,
DH:TT has a NEW POPE! You're just going to have to
adjust. IMO your mystification re:SP types ain't a mystery. Preach the (their)
gospel (their doctrine) by any means whatsoever. As they see it the end
justifies the means. Though you and I are most assuredly not of one mind as to
Jesus yet,
olds
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Imagination
anyone?
From: Judy
Taylor
Hey Kevin, this is
excellent - one question - is there room for &quo
IFO thought quite the opposite. But then you know
me.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 20:06
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
DaveH, I cant help
but notice the change in yo
I don't mind funnin' even at my expense. Why would
I as I've done so often, often myself. However, shall I ask of you, Iz, whether
you believe the Appalachian snake handlers to be testing God or, obeying His
Word?
I note that upon raising an actual matter (HS &
tongues) everyone fled to th
Is that the one owned by Dolly Parton?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 20:06
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Truth
Wont buy him a
ticket to Gloryland. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[m
is not written to be interpreted by
unregenerate ppl with unrenewed fallen minds;
please read 1 Cor 2:14 and pray that God will
open your eyes
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:46:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
you added SIN to SIN in refusing to answer questions about such
False testimonyLeviticus 5:1. And if a soul
sin, and hear the voice of swearing, and is a witness, whether he hath
seen or known of it; if he do not utter it, then
he shall bear his iniquity. Lance
Muir &
: Is that is
because you do not consider yourself a protected friend of the moderator and
fear reprisal, Lance.or is it because you have a measure of respect for TT
rules and other TTers?Lance Muir wrote:
So Kevin, at least I know where we stand.
Thanks for the
I did likewise, Dave.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 10:01
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
The truth is not Ad. Hom attacks if one can prove
his point to a reasonable conclusio
e can count on to take every opportunity to lift the name of
JESUS!!O it wuz so short you left him out HOW
SAD!Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
SS since age 4.
Converted in an evangelistic mtg age
15
Baptized shortly thereafter
Kept it sh
e shall bear his iniquity. Lance
Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Point proven?? Like I said, I stay for the
humour.
-
Original Message -
From:
Dean Moore
To:
Truth
and pray that God will
open your eyes
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:46:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
But you write as if you, Kevin and, Dean
should be followed/heeded as the only interpreters of Scr
2006 08:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] An Offensive
Gospel.
My answer? If the shoe fits! Now you are
free to give your testimony Lance
I wait with bated breath ...
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:48:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
I await Judy'
ther Lance?
My your Bible must have a lot of holes
cut in it
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:44:11 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
My oh my but, I'm so pleased that this
'dialogue' is being saved for posterity! Aren't you?
I
whatever we are playing with. He has to win.
This may be cute in a 3yr old but should go no
further. We are training him in the way he
should go, so the fun will be temporary and the
imagination eventually brought back to reality.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:03:48 -0500 "Lance
terpreted by
unregenerate ppl with unrenewed fallen minds;
please read 1 Cor 2:14 and pray that God will
open your eyes
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:46:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
But you write as if you,
No Oscar I suppose but, thanks anyway.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 07:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
It is a RED LETTER day lance makes a stand!Lance
Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
g you.
Then you added SIN to SIN in refusing to answer questions about such
False testimonyLeviticus 5:1. And if a soul sin,
and hear the voice of swearing, and is a witness, whether he hath seen or
known of it; if he do not utter it, then he shall
bear his iniquity. Lance Muir
&l
o you Lance?
Scripture is not written to be interpreted by
unregenerate ppl with unrenewed fallen minds;
please read 1 Cor 2:14 and pray that God will open
your eyes
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:46:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
ashes for the devastation caused by
your innocent proteges in New York on 9-11-2003 and
in Israel for the past 40yrs??
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:21:11 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
The 'murderous muslims' shall give account for
t
e for
them?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:00:57 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
DM Judy, during this time of his 'absence' from
TT, is pretty much free of mention.
You, Dean and
Kevin write and, I read you. Thus, an answer to 'w
en north and - as
to disapproval
only GWB has him beat.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:12:48 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This is the 'big one' 'Lizabeth! I 'bin,
ATJudy, 'gottcha'd' by Kevin. Wha
you saying that God needs some of
them to exalt themselves in His Name
with their so called "original thoughts" So where in
scripture are all the artists among God's
Covenant people Israel?
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:16 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
k] An Offensive
Gospel.
John Lennon and three year olds
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:39:56 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Imagination anyone?
From: Judy Taylor
Hey Kevin, this is excellent - one
question - is the
[TruthTalk] An Offensive
Gospel.
You still don't get it do you Lance?
Scripture is not written to be interpreted by
unregenerate ppl with unrenewed fallen minds;
please read 1 Cor 2:14 and pray that God will open
your eyes
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:46:58 -0500 "
lk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 06:55
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
Then where do all the opinions and appraisals from
your email address originate?
You are critical of DM and defer to DZ
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:45:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
6 06:31:05 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
'There is no room for broadmindedness..' =
Kevin, Judy and Dean pronounce only truth and all truth, all of the time.
Why not LET THEM DO YOUR THINKING FOR YOU?
- Original Message --
he list.
Such obvious love/hate going on toward him from the frozen north and - as to
disapproval
only GWB has him beat.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 06:12:48 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
This is the 'big one' 'Lizabeth! I 'bin,
writes:
myth (2+2 is 4, the Earth
revolves around the Sun, gravity dictates the ebb & flow of
Earth's oceanic tides, 'truth came
through Jesus Christ')
On Mon, 6 Mar
Gary is the one artist on TT.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 07, 2006 06:21
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
I thank the Lord for that if what you have been
proferring a
ceanic tides, 'truth came through Jesus
Christ')
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:38:14 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
||
- Original Message -
That was an reference to the 'Appalachian snake
handlers'. Thus, those who've gone a touch overboard on literalism. Look in the
mirror folks.
When listen 'through' Kevin, Judy and, Dean you can
hear which tradition did their thinkin' for 'em. Snakes anyone?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 16:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] WOOHOO Lance -
Here i
"No evidence sugges that I am not' = there is
evidence to suggest that I am
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 23:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
No evidence sugg
After reading some on TT, I can't help but wonder as to the truthfulness of
'Lie # 3'.
- Original Message -
From: "Judy Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: March 06, 2006 16:02
Subject: [TruthTalk] WOOHOO Lance - Here is someone saying the same thing as
me..!!
The Seven Great
the Bible
and Kevin knows this.. as for your plethora of
words... No telling where they are from
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:31:28 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Neither are a plethora of other words!
and
From: Kevin Deegan
e are waiting for the LOW DOWN
Where were you when you OBSERVERED this deplorable action?
Or are you just BEARING TRUELY False witness
again?
where you there?Lance Muir
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Me to
- Original Message -----
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 3/6/2006 12:23:25 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit'
of truthtalk?
Me too, Dave. When TRUELY OBJECTIONABLE
BEHAVIOUR is objected to (by 'acti
THE truth to read MY truth or, truth as I interpret
it.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 18:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of
truthtalk?
Moderator: No-The truth is not Ad. Hom attacks i
She (Anne Lamott) is a writer I thoroughly enjoy. See'Traveling Mercies'.
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "TruthTalk"
Sent: March 07, 2006 02:40
Subject: [TruthTalk] Courtesy of A.Word.A.Day
You can safely assume that you've created God in your own im
Neither are a plethora of other words!
and
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 14:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
Let me point out that the word DISCERNMENT is not in
the Bible![EMAIL PROT
Hereafter WOT shall be employed by me. Thanks,
Gary!!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 10:46
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Truth
is there any reason now to
dispute that discernment is based on partia
Me too, Dave. When TRUELY OBJECTIONABLE BEHAVIOUR
is objected to (by 'acting out') these persons occasionally do seem
surprised.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave Hansen
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 10:43
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit
Art Bell?
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 06, 2006 07:18
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Coming Soon, Who
are they expecting?
http://www.shareintl.org/
Many now expect the return of their awaited Teacher, wheth
Lance says sometimes.
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 05, 2006 23:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Talking
Truth
I agree with you about 1 Cor. 13:12, that we cannot be
all-knowing.But I think you are making
2006 16:36
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] emailing:
sinnersinhand
Why, Lance? Lance Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Lose the adverbs, Christine. Also, lose the
word 'delicious'.
-
Original Message -
From:
301 - 400 of 5161 matches
Mail list logo
