Lance Muir wrote:
Please remember that Jesus already
'gave you a break', Linda. You're not needing a 'break' from me.
Let me say something to everyone on
TT who employs the letters RCC as an epithet; THIS WAS THE BIRTH OF
CHRIST'S CHURCH!! If y'all got a problem with that
2 Jul 2005 11:07:10 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'
Lance, what you fail to ?apprehend? is that if DM and JT are truly seeking Truth (which they are), then eventually they will reach agreement. The nice thing is that they are not disagreeing on anything of
Lance Muir wrote:
Forget what I 'say'. Just stand back
and watch. I'd say that what this amounts to is a sideshow for our
Mormon friends. They are being told by Perry, Kevin, you, David and
Linda that that which and, in Whom, they believe is not Biblical. You
folks are
Myth.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 2:27
PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A
'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'
Please remember that Jesus already
'gave you a break', Linda
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A
'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'
Who says this is not an esstential? You?
DM? And what are these essentials/ Noneof
you fundies ever get around to answering that question. Do you all
think this goes unnoticed?
-Original Message-
From: ShieldsFamily
You did not answer my question? -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:56:40 -0500Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'
Understanding whether Jesus had the ability to be tempted
.
Perry
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A 'prooftexter' vs a 'contexter'
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:41:38 -0500
Lance Muir wrote:
Forget what I 'say'. Just stand back and watch. I'd say that what
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
