two cents
Linda Dunbar
From: tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
at IETF
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2017 10:30 AM
To: Bob Briscoe
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org >> tsv-area@ietf.org ; pa...@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [Panrg] Proposed Path Aware Networking RG
Brian, Bob
Spencer and Martin,
I would like to serve on the TSV-ART Review Team.
Linda Dunbar
From: tsv-area [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Dawkins
at IETF
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 3:04 PM
To: tsv-cha...@ietf.org; tsv-area@ietf.org >> tsv-area@ietf.org;
tsv-...@ie
See inline below:
-Original Message-
> A communication between two end points traverses multiple
administrative domains.
Yes, but transport protocols don't interact with AD properties per se.
> The TSV-Area AD should have the knowledge of BGP, the domain demarcation
> across different
Today's network is layers of layers of overlay (multiple layers of
encapsulation). A communication between two end points traverses multiple
administrative domains.
The TSV-Area AD should have the knowledge of BGP, the domain demarcation across
different administrative domains.
Linda
-
g.com
> Linda
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Templin, Fred L [mailto:fred.l.temp...@boeing.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 2:10 PM
> To: Linda Dunbar; Black, David; ts...@ietf.org; tsv-area@ietf.org
> Cc: Mark Townsley; int-a...@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Int-area]
To: Linda Dunbar; Black, David; ts...@ietf.org; tsv-area@ietf.org
Cc: Mark Townsley; int-a...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Int-area] Fragmentation and Path MTU text in nvo3 dataplane reqts
draft
Hi Linda,
The maximum MTU for an IPv4 link is 64KB (per RFC0791) and the maximum MTU for
an IPv6 link is
I am confused of the math here. If most physical links MTU is 1500 bytes (or
2000 bytes for some), how do we have""4GB"" minus the encapsulation overhead
for IPv6, as the "tunnel link Maximum Transmission Unit (MTU)".
Is 4GB correct ???
Linda
-Original Message-
From: Int-area [mailto
I think that the "fragmentation and path MTU text" should be seriously
discussed in SFC WG that is considering Service Chain Header format.
I've heard people mentioning encoding the explicit Service Chain path as
metadata to the data packet header for some scenarios where head-end SC
classifie
Lloyd,
Can you elaborate why zero checksum is bad on the email before the session (to
get people prepared)?
Linda
-Original Message-
From: l.w...@surrey.ac.uk [mailto:l.w...@surrey.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2014 12:45 AM
To: Linda Dunbar; tsv-area@ietf.org
Cc: tsv
At London 89th IETF meeting, the TSV area meeting will be 9am~11:30am on Thurs
March 6 at Viscount.
Here is the draft agenda:
- TSV AD/NOMCOM (20 minutes)
- ANRP talk - Keith Winstein -- (20 + 10 minutes)
- How to train other protocol designers about UDP Design Considerations
(10 + 20 mi
Michael,
Can you give some examples of the "internet applications" stated?
Linda
> -Original Message-
> From: tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Michael Welzl
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 1:31 PM
> To: tsv-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re:
2 PM
> To: Martin Stiemerling; Linda Dunbar; tsv-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Announcing the TSVAREA session on "Evolution of IETF
> Transport Protocols" @ IETF-88
>
> On 10/29/2013 4:18 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
> > Hi Linda,
> >
> > We have a full talk
Martin and Spencer,
Possible to include HTTP? More and more applications run HTTP, and many people
believe that HTTP is the future of the transport protocol(s).
Linda
> -Original Message-
> From: tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-boun...@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Martin Stieme
13 matches
Mail list logo
