[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-455) patch for tuscany-443 using inline functions will not compile/work on Linux

patch for tuscany-443 using inline functions will not compile/work on Linux --- Key: TUSCANY-455 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-455 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C+

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-454) WSDL file misloading running sca demo helloworldws

WSDL file misloading running sca demo helloworldws -- Key: TUSCANY-454 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-454 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: Java SCA Axis Binding Reporter: Jervis Liu

WSDL file misloading running sca demo helloworldws

Hi Guys, I am currently testing the interoperability between Tuscany and Celtix. When I changed Tuscany sca demo helloworldws's WSDL file to include in/out parameters, I found this change in WSDL is not recognized by Tuscany runtime at all. How to reproduce: 1. Change helloworld.wsdl output m

Re: UML diagrams and a draft PDF document for the sandbox core are uploaded to Tuscany Wiki

Thanks Raymond for taking this on. I have made to refactors today so could you regenerate (I hope you didn't have to do the model by hand)? The two basic changes I did are: 1. Rename ScopeContext to ScopeContainer since it "contains component implementation instances" 2. Internalized Instan

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

Good question... In the spec group, one of the major changes we are currently undertaking is a move to a recursive model where components can either be leaf-types ("atomic") or composite, in which case they may contain children. In previous versions of the spec we had a two-level model (m

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-22) Errors serializing an SDO2 graph

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-22?page=all ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-22: --- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in revision 412225. > Errors serializing an SDO2 graph > > > Key: TUSCANY-22 >

UML diagrams and a draft PDF document for the sandbox core are uploaded to Tuscany Wiki

Hi, I uploaded a draft PDF document together with a set of UML class diagrams to Tuscany wiki @ http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SandboxCore. Please note these documents are work in progress and not guaranteed to be accurate and complete. They are produced based on my understanding

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

By the way can someone explain what the term "Recursive Core Architecture" means? Paul On 6/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It looks as if we have the choice of Thursday or Friday this week, or rescheduling for two weeks. I'd prefer we do it this week. Jim On Jun 6, 2006, at 1:28

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

It looks as if we have the choice of Thursday or Friday this week, or rescheduling for two weeks. I'd prefer we do it this week. Jim On Jun 6, 2006, at 1:28 PM, Paul Fremantle wrote: Next week would be better for me. I'm landing home from the US on Friday and 8-10PST is 4-6pm on Friday eveni

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

Next week would be better for me. I'm landing home from the US on Friday and 8-10PST is 4-6pm on Friday evening which aint popular in blighty :-) Paul On 6/6/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm out all next week so it sounds as if Friday is the best time for most people. Jim On Jun

[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-416) Update helloworldws-celtix sample readme on instrumentation support

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-416?page=all ] Daniel Kulp closed TUSCANY-416: --- Resolution: Fixed Patch applied. Thanks! > Update helloworldws-celtix sample readme on instrumentation support > ---

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

I'm out all next week so it sounds as if Friday is the best time for most people. Jim On Jun 6, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Rick wrote: I like to second all of what Ant wrote and also Ken Tam asked if it could not be delayed till next week. I'd like to be up to speed and just a few days more would

Help with proxies and component context's getInstance

Hi everyone, I am experimenting with adding XSLT as an implementation type (with a WSDL interface for now). I have looked at the javascript container and found it very helpful, but I have two questions about the use of ComponentContext and proxy factories. Among other things, I have created

Re: Recursive core architectural overview

I like to second all of what Ant wrote and also Ken Tam asked if it could not be delayed till next week. I'd like to be up to speed and just a few days more would help to digest it all to be more informed, but I'll go with Friday if that's what it is. ant elder wrote: I agree 100% with Ken, cou

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-453) SDO:int is not supported

SDO:int is not supported Key: TUSCANY-453 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-453 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environment: All Reporter: Simon Laws C++ SDO currently i

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-452) IDREF, IDREFS not supported

IDREF, IDREFS not supported --- Key: TUSCANY-452 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-452 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environment: Windows XP Reporter: Simon Laws Readin

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-451) anyType not supported correctly

anyType not supported correctly --- Key: TUSCANY-451 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-451 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environment: WIndows XP Reporter: Simon Laws

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-450) ElementOfSimpleTypeWithSDOPropertyType and ElementOfSimpleTypeWithSDOOppositePropertyType not supported

ElementOfSimpleTypeWithSDOPropertyType and ElementOfSimpleTypeWithSDOOppositePropertyType not supported --- Key: TUSCANY-450 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-450

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-449) Implementation ignores ElementSubstitutionGroupBase

Implementation ignores ElementSubstitutionGroupBase Key: TUSCANY-449 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-449 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environ

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-448) ElementWithSDOName fails on write

ElementWithSDOName fails on write - Key: TUSCANY-448 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-448 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environment: Windows XP Reporter: Simon L

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-447) AttributeWithSDOPropertyType and AttributeWithSDOPropertySDOOppositePropertyType not supported

AttributeWithSDOPropertyType and AttributeWithSDOPropertySDOOppositePropertyType not supported --- Key: TUSCANY-447 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-447 Project: Tu

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-446) tuscany::sca::model::Wsdl does not support WSDL with typed message parts

tuscany::sca::model::Wsdl does not support WSDL with typed message parts Key: TUSCANY-446 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-446 Project: Tuscany Type: Improvement Components:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-445) ComplexTypeOpenContent output element type incorrect

ComplexTypeOpenContent output element type incorrect - Key: TUSCANY-445 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-445 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Envir

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-444) ComplexTypeExtendingSimpleType

ComplexTypeExtendingSimpleType -- Key: TUSCANY-444 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-444 Project: Tuscany Type: Bug Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Environment: Windows XP Reporter: Simon Laws

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-416) Update helloworldws-celtix sample readme on instrumentation support

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-416?page=all ] Daniel Kulp reassigned TUSCANY-416: --- Assign To: Daniel Kulp > Update helloworldws-celtix sample readme on instrumentation support > --

RE: SCA Management API for Tuscany

Hi Adi, I already created a Jira issue regarding how to set up Tuscany helloworldws-celtix demo with JMX instrumentation last week, a patch is provided at the same, which includes an updated readme and a celtix config file. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-416 Dan Kulp has kindly of

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-443) Add further code to support use of string objects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-443?page=all ] Ed Slattery reassigned TUSCANY-443: --- Assign To: Ed Slattery > Add further code to support use of string objects > - > > Key: TUSCANY-

Board Report for June 2006

Dear WS Folks, It's time for our quarterly report to the board. It's our duty as committers and pmc members to provide an accurate and detailed description of our activities to the board. So please take a few minutes and add information on projects that you are involved in. http://wiki.apache.or

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-443) Add further code to support use of string objects

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-443?page=all ] Geoff Winn updated TUSCANY-443: --- Attachment: TUSCANY-443.patch > Add further code to support use of string objects > - > > Key: TUSCANY-4

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-443) Add further code to support use of string objects

Add further code to support use of string objects - Key: TUSCANY-443 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-443 Project: Tuscany Type: Improvement Components: C++ SDO Versions: Cpp-current Envir

Using Interceptors to convert objects to XmlObjects for JavaScript/E4X support

I wondered about using Tuscany PolicyBuilders and Interceptors to help with E4X support for the work required in TUSCANY-418, TUSCANY-419, and TUSCANY-420. Right now the E4X code isn't so elegant with the way it works out when and how to convert the Java objects in a message into E4X XML, and with

[SDO C++] Representing strings as objects rather than C style character pointers

I've been investigating how to modify the C++ variant of SDO to use string objects (ie something like std::string) rather than C style strings as it mostly does currently. Internally we can do what we want, but the user visible interface needs more care and has implications for the specification.