I'm out all next week so it sounds as if Friday is the best time for
most people.
Jim
On Jun 6, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Rick wrote:
> I like to second all of what Ant wrote and also Ken Tam asked if it
> could not be delayed till next week. I'd like to be up to speed and
> just a few days more would help to digest it all to be more
> informed, but I'll go with Friday if that's what it is.
> ant elder wrote:
>> I agree 100% with Ken, could you give just a little more
>> information about
>> whats going on here? That email just gives hints - there's been
>> some SCA
>> spec changes, there's some code in the the sandbox for "recursive
>> core
>> architecture work" and "to clearly demarcate the runtime extension
>> mechanism."
>>
>> What are the spec changes, are there any new spec documents people
>> can
>> review?
>>
>> Is there anything else that has changed from the M1 release code
>> to whats in
>> the sandbox?
>>
>> Whats the state of the sandbox code, does it work, are there any
>> samples,
>> does bigbank run?
>>
>> What is the intention for the future of the sandbox code?
>>
>> It sounds like we're being asked to just go look at some code in
>> the sandbox
>> and work all this out for ourselves. There's a lot of people
>> listening who
>> have no idea whats going on, so some more detailed background
>> information
>> would really help.
>>
>> Friday is bad for me I can't make anything much after 9am PDT,
>> same for
>> Mondays after 5:30BST, but i'll fit in with most times any
other day.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On 6/5/06, Kenneth Tam <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>>>
>>> I am very interested in this, but the short notice also
concerns me.
>>> Can we push this out to at least the end of the week (say
>>> Friday?) or
>>> sometime next week so that more people on the list get a
chance to
>>> find out about it and fit it into their schedules?
>>>
>>> Also, Jim & Jeremy -- if you guys have anything in the way of
>>> explanatory material that you could circulate on the list/wiki
>>> before
>>> the presentation, I think that would be very useful.. certainly I
>>> could use a little more context to help with my own browsing.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> k
>>>
>>> On 6/5/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> > Jim Marino wrote:
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > > There has been some mention offline of Jeremy and I
providing an
>>> > > overview of changes to the SCA specifications and related
>>> recursive
>>> > > core architecture work going on in the sandbox, perhaps
>>> Wednesday. I'm
>>> > > happy to do this, however, I'm a bit concerned that since
>>> this has
>>> not
>>> > > been brought up on the list interested people may not be
>>> able to
>>> attend
>>> > > on short notice. Also, a time has not been mentioned. I
propose
>>> > > 9PST-11PST, using a combination of Web-Ex and toll-free dial-
>>> in,
>>> which
>>> > > will be provided later.
>>> > >
>>> > > If interested people cannot make that time, please speak up
>>> so we can
>>> > > arrange an alternate (please don't hesitate to do so, even if
>>> you are
>>> > > the only one).
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Jim, I'm afraid I can't make 8 to 10 on Wed - can do before or
>>> after.
>>> > --
>>> > Jeremy
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]