Re: svn commit: r431079

2006-08-13 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Thinking a little more, using the ImplementationProcessor mechanisms seems like a better way to tackle this. One major advantage would be that we could add metadata to the service contract based on data type or annotations (e.g. adding metadata saying that a parameter should be bound using

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-616) JavaServiceContract introspection should use the ImplementationProcessor mechanism

2006-08-13 Thread Jeremy Boynes (JIRA)
JavaServiceContract introspection should use the ImplementationProcessor mechanism -- Key: TUSCANY-616 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-616 Project:

Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-611) RMI Binding

2006-08-13 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi Jeremy / Jim, Thanks for continuing to guide me on this :-) - Jim, the concern you raised about the business interface not inheriting from Remote and the need to do some sort of mediation has been a primary concern to me since M1. I have been able to get that working now. Now there is no