OK... I'm a little wary of the SDO changes! I think having a stack of the
namespaces and writing them as required on the element as they are needed is
exactly right, in fact that is how I wrote it originally ;-) Since then,
however, some changes have removed this logic! You may have seen some of t
Pete Robbins wrote:
Sebastien,
Go ahead and commit the changes. I'll review them once committed. The
logging changes sound good.
I'm pretty sure the xsi:type writing has been fixed (many times!) so I'd
like to look at the latest change.
Cheers and good luck!
Pete, Thanks for helping review
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-920?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-920:
---
Attachment: TUSCANY-920.patch
The attached patch was generated by svn diff run from the tuscany/cpp/sdo
directory.
> SDO XML parser do
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-919?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino reassigned TUSCANY-919:
--
Assignee: Pete Robbins
> Incorrect xsi:type and namespace prefix declarations with open types
> ---
SDO XML parser does not consider ns prefix decls. from parent elements
--
Key: TUSCANY-920
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-920
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-919?page=all ]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino updated TUSCANY-919:
---
Attachment: TUSCANY-919.patch
The attached patch was generated by svn diff run from the tuscany/cpp/sdo
directory.
> Incorrect xsi:type
Incorrect xsi:type and namespace prefix declarations with open types
Key: TUSCANY-919
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-919
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
I would like to make the following rule modifications to checkstyle
if no one objects. I will assume lazy consensus if I do not hear back.
1. Change NCSS to 120
2. Change Executable statement count to 100
3. Allow declaring parameters of type LinkedList
Jim
Jim,
See comments inline.
Simon
Jim Marino wrote:
On Nov 10, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Simon Nash wrote:
As far as I know these are the only things (apart from the core Tuscany
runtime and application artifacts) that always need to be physically
packaged within the war. Other things would eith
Hello Willian,
This might be helpful if you have not yet seen it:
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview/RDBDAS_Java_User_Guide
Thanks for your interest!
--
Kevin
Luciano Resende wrote:
Hi William
Very good to hear back from you... I think this would be a very go
Sebastien,
Go ahead and commit the changes. I'll review them once committed. The
logging changes sound good.
I'm pretty sure the xsi:type writing has been fixed (many times!) so I'd
like to look at the latest change.
Cheers and good luck!
On 11/11/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi William
Very good to hear back from you... I think this would be a very good
addition for Tuscany and DAS.
My suggestion would be to use the following Wiki page to collaborate on
the HOW TO :
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview/RDBDAS_HOWTO_HelloDASApp
I cou
Hi everyone!
I would like to build a simple "HOW TO" to help people making their first
DAS app. Is there any tutorial like this? Do you think it'll be heplful?
Doing the "HOW TO" I think I can learn more about Tuscany, and could get
more involved with the project.
My idea is to make i
Tuesday 8 PST works for me.
Thanks
Nicole
-Original Message-
From: Jim Marino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 8:05 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: OSGi Binding
Monday early morning is bad for me (I have a meeting starting early).
Could we do Tu
Hi all,
The last few weeks I went to some conferences (incl. the Colorado
Software Summit, and the WebSphere Technical Exchange in San Francisco)
and had to fix a few bugs in our C++ runtime as I was putting demos
together for these conferences... I've been distracted and didn't have
time to
On Nov 11, 2006, at 6:16 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
The C&I spec defines a conversational interface as annotated with
@Scope("session")
but since we are also considering HTTP Session scopes, it seems
that using @Scope("CONVERSATIONAL") would make things
clearer. Notice that earlier in the
Use MS VS Express compiler for builds
-
Key: TUSCANY-918
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-918
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: C++ Build, C++ SCA, C++ SDO
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-463?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-463.
Resolution: Won't Fix
no longer relevant
> Doc on how to use context
> -
>
> Key: TUSCANY-463
> URL: h
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-869?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-869.
Resolution: Fixed
> SCA binary distro contains include headers for Ruby/Python extensions
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-789?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-789.
Resolution: Fixed
> Update the release notes
>
>
> Key: TUSCANY-789
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/ji
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-787?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-787.
Resolution: Fixed
> Document how to build & run the samples
> ---
>
> Key: TUSCANY-787
> UR
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-793?page=all ]
Pete Robbins closed TUSCANY-793.
Resolution: Fixed
> Update Windows release build scripts
>
>
> Key: TUSCANY-793
> URL: htt
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-796?page=all ]
Pete Robbins resolved TUSCANY-796.
--
Fix Version/s: Cpp-M2
(was: Cpp-current)
Resolution: Fixed
> SCA C++ build fails on VC++ 6
> -
>
The C&I spec defines a conversational interface as annotated with
@Scope("session")
but since we are also considering HTTP Session scopes, it seems
that using @Scope("CONVERSATIONAL") would make things
clearer. Notice that earlier in the spec (sec 1.2.1.4) the annotation
@Scope("CONVERSATION")
Quick question: Is there an annotation that marks an interface as
conversational?
Cheers,
--
Pete
25 matches
Mail list logo
