I have added the following items to the 0.90 branch :
- Updates to Contribution and Contribution javadocs
- Merged the fix for web-apps to store the sca-contribution.xml on the
proper location (root of the war file\META-INF).
A complete rebuild passed with SUCESS, and I have tested both
Jean-Sebastien wrote :
Why can't whole contents of the WAR be part of the contribution?
Currently this is how things are done. Is there any requirement to filter
the contents of WEB-INF\lib, or dependency libraries should also be
processed by the contribution ?
Well, overall, looks like
Well, I thought more about this subject, and I think I'm OK with the
following distributions :
source : all sources for implementation and samples
binary : implementation binaries and dependencies + javadoc + samples
binaries
\lib - api implementation and dependency
\doc - javadocs
Amita, did you solve the JIRA 952 memory leak problem?
Except JIRA 800 that luciano is going to commit, is there any other new
feature or bug to be implemented for this release?
Adriano Crestani
On 5/15/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have committed the initial part of
done
Kelvin.
On 19/05/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone working with SDO publish new snapshots ? The ones available
in
the maven repo today is about a month old and has some inconsistencies
with
current trunk code, this cause issues for those who would like to build
On 5/18/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
SCA now have some samples that integrate with DAS and you will need
the DAS
in your repository. As i don't think we published snapshots after we
renamed
the version, you will need to build it locally, or
ant elder wrote:
On 5/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to do a little bit of cleanup of the new sample modules that
we've added to better separate the sample extensions and the samples
showing how to use them.
I'll make the following changes:
- add missing files
ant elder wrote:
Could i either delete or move the contrib/ and doc/ folders from the
java/sca/ folder so you don't get all that old stuff when you check
out the
sca project? The things in doc/ are a bit out of date now aren't they? or
they could be put on the wiki somewhere. The contrib
Hi all,
I just checked out the java tree and encountered the following problem,
which seems fixable with a one line change (details at bottom).
Running
org.apache.tuscany.sca.databinding.extension.SimpleTypeMapperExtensionTestCase
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
Can we delete tuscany/java/distribution now that our new SCA
distribution is in tuscany/java/sca/distribution?
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 5/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to do a little bit of cleanup of the new sample modules that
we've added to better separate the sample extensions and the samples
showing how to
Hi, Bill.
Welcome to Tuscany.
You hit an interesting known issue related to the format of xsd:gMonth
described at http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/ch19-77111.html. The
following is quoted from that page:
The value space of xsd:gMonth is the period of one calendar month recurring
each
Hi Raymond,
Thanks for the welcome. You hit the nail on the head. I had thought I was
building with Sun JDK 1.5, turns out I was building with Sun JDK 1.6. I
switched to 1.5 and it blew past that problem and another I was having. I
did have to make one change to get it to build though, even
Just took a look inside contrib/host-equinox and discovered it's empty other
than skeleton code for launching equinox. My impression from
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg15054.html that
OSGi was that OSGi support would probably be working now. What I'd like is
an SCA
There were problems with the previous structure that led to the
splitting of these samples. With all the files together in a
single module, the only way to allow the samples to run out of
the box in the binary distro was to place the client/application
code that used the extension in the same
I'm pleased to say that it's working for me from the branch as well.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
The distribution build in the release 0.90 branch works fine for me all the
way through, Very strange!
Simon
-
To
I have updated the DAS distributions to work as proposed under revision
#539815, this should be aligned with the SCA and SDO proposed distributions,
the only difference being that, the samples on the binary distribution have
source code attached to the binary distributions, instead of having the
17 matches
Mail list logo
