On 8/16/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The runtime currently prints the servlet mappings to System.out when it
> starts. In order to make that kind of information easier to use, I've
> started to put together a home page that people can point their Web
> browser to, listi
Demonstrate faulty transaction support in DAS
-
Key: TUSCANY-1543
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1543
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java DAS RDB
Aff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1541?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520146
]
Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1541:
---
Here is the stacktrace. I misread it and the problem actually isn't coming f
The runtime currently prints the servlet mappings to System.out when it
starts. In order to make that kind of information easier to use, I've
started to put together a home page that people can point their Web
browser to, listing some basic information about the running Tuscany
runtime, servlet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520145
]
gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542:
They are different!
SCA has specified BPEL from to direction, one
It seems ok for me, everything ran fine ; )
+1
Adriano Crestani
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>...ant
>
> On 8/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany DAS for Java.
> >
> > All the major is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520141
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-1542:
--
We have started this under java/sca/modules/implementation.bpe
BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
Key: TUSCANY-1542
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Affects
XMLStreamException in when calling XMLHelper.load() with a large XML
Key: TUSCANY-1541
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1541
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type:
Brady,
sorry I haven't had too much time to comment on this but it all looks
sensible and in the right direction to me.
Regarding the schema loading, where you say
"sca-implementation-java.xsd (loaded but ignored) " I think this means
we will load this schema but as no extension is registered to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520109
]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1523:
-
Can you try to register your artifact processor
+1
...ant
On 8/13/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany DAS for Java.
>
> All the major issues reported in previous RC should now be fixed, and
> the only change from RC3 is a fix to file permission issues on the
> distribut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fuhwei Lwo updated TUSCANY-1528:
Attachment: 1528.patch
Based on the comment from Frank B., a package should always has a document
[snip]
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
I am really not able to classify these two as just related to policy
implementation alone. From what I understand these two are mechanisms for
extensions to publish meta-data in general and not specifically metadata
related to their support for policies. I just a
On 8/14/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "tuscany-dev"
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:37 AM
> Subject: Late resolution of reference targets - was:Accessing glo
HI Sebastien, thanks... please see my comments inline.
- Venkat
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Venkata Krishnan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The Assembly Model specs mentions the 'need' for definitions of metadata
> > related to implementation and binding extensions t
You can definetly get Atom feeds using the following URL :
http://apache-tuscany.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default
As for RSS, there is some documentation here [1], but that seems not
working anymore.
As a tip, I also use iGoogle [2] as my homepage, and customized it to
give me access to all r
Hi,
There is no RSS Feed on Tuscany blog[1]. Any one knows how to enable this?
[1]: http://apache-tuscany.blogspot.com/
Haleh
Abstract Static Base Types mixed with Dynamic Extended Types
Key: TUSCANY-1540
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1540
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Co
+1
On 8/14/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tried tests, samples, checked documentation. Looks fine to me.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On 8/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Please vote to release the beta1 distribution of Tuscany DAS for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1538.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied
> InitialContextCreator Patches
> --
You can also increase the memory options in the sca pom, in the
surefire plugin configuration section.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/pom.xml
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/15/07, a
On 8/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Axis2 1.3 has just been released so how about moving up to that? There's a
> lot of improvements and bug fixes in it and as its the level we'll likely
> go
> 1.0 with i think it would be good to get it in sooner so we have time to
> find and fixe
On 8/14/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/11/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We put together a demo [1] on Tuscany/Geronimo integration for the
> > LinuxWorld 2007. You are welcome to play with it and give us feedback.
> >
> > Please follow
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >
On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ant elder wrote:
> > > > > On 8/15/07, Je
Hi,
There is a phase in the policy fwk impl that needs to validate attachment
points for the intents attached (or specified) in them. A PolicyIntent
definition has a 'constrains' attribute that lists the valid attachment
points (bindings / implementations) for an intent. This list is a list of
Q
On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > ant elder wrote:
> > > > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Jean-
On 8/14/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We aggresively create the invocation chains for each runtime wire in
> > CompositeActivatorImpl. I'm changing the code to defer the creations
> > to a later point when they are used for the first t
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>>
> [snip]
>
>
> >> Another problem is all our
Hi Steve,
I am posting this to Tuscany-dev to see if there is a problem with the
nightly while I am also downloading the latest to see if I run into the
issue.
Haleh
On 8/14/07, Steve Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been working through the example. Everything builds OK.
>
> I
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Raymond Feng wrote:
> > Comments inline.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Raymond
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "Simon Laws"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "tuscany-dev"
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:37 AM
> > Subject: Late
On 8/15/07, Ville Kaseva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I can't access http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/ website since
> yesterday.
>
> I am looking for Tuscany SDO binary release for Windows. Is it
> available from somewhere else?
>
> Yours,
>
> Ville
>
> ---
On 8/15/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I always get a "Java heap space" error during the build while the itests
> > are
> > running these days. Runs fine if i build from within the itests folder
> but
> > building from the top
Steve,
Java SCA FAQ says that Java 1.6 may not work. Can you try 1.5?
Here is the link:
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/tuscany-sca-java-faq.html#TuscanySCAJava-FAQ-BuildA
Haleh
On 8/14/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
> I am posting this to Tuscany-dev to see if th
Amita,
Maybe I am not getting this. What is the user case scenario that you are
trying to cover with your suggestion (I understand what you are suggesting
to do, but not sure of use case)? In what case client needs what you are
mentioning, beyond what is provided today?
Thanks for the clarificati
On 8/15/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I always get a "Java heap space" error during the build while the itests
> are
> running these days. Runs fine if i build from within the itests folder but
> building from the top sca folder always fails. Does anyone else ever see
> this? Anyone
Its working fine for me when i try now.
Just to confirm the URLs, the Tuscany download page is:
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/sdo-java-releases.html
You can get the actual release artifacts directly from the Apache
distribution area at:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/tuscany/java/s
Hi,
I can't access http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/ website since yesterday.
I am looking for Tuscany SDO binary release for Windows. Is it
available from somewhere else?
Yours,
Ville
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTE
I always get a "Java heap space" error during the build while the itests are
running these days. Runs fine if i build from within the itests folder but
building from the top sca folder always fails. Does anyone else ever see
this? Anyone know if there's something i can fiddle with in the mvn config
ant elder wrote:
On 8/10/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 8/8/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We talked about this before (
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>
> >>> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >>>
> [snip]
>
>
> >> Another problem is all our
ant elder wrote:
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Another problem is all our bindings work differently. So
, <
binding.rmi/> etc all result in a
service
bei
On 8/15/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> >> [snip]
> >>
> Another problem is all our bindings work differently. So
> , <
> > binding.rmi/> etc all result in a
> > service
> > being
Now that callbacks are represented as regular services/references, are
the "if (callback.) { }" on lines 503 and 579 of
CompositeActivatorImpl still necessary?
If yes, then the next question is: Why? :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
--
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
Another problem is all our bindings work differently. So
, <
> binding.rmi/> etc all result in a
> service
> being available at a different endpoint. Also the uri attribute
on those
>
> bindings all work differently so uri
Haleh,
Your right it is a Java 6 problem. If I build with jre1.5.0_11 the demo
starts up OK.
Things are not right on the demo web page. The apple, orange and pear
check boxes and labels are missing. I'm looking into this now.
Cheers.
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 23:01, haleh mahbod wrote:
> Stev
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The Assembly Model specs mentions the 'need' for definitions of metadata
related to implementation and binding extensions types as follows:
"2665 In addition to the definition for the new implementation instance
element, there needs to be an
2666 associated implemen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved TUSCANY-1464.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Wrong query results when SELECT misses PKs
> --
Raymond Feng wrote:
Comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Simon Laws"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "tuscany-dev"
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:37 AM
Subject: Late resolution of reference targets - was:Accessing global
domain information
Currently in Composit
51 matches
Mail list logo
