Luciano Resende wrote:
Could you also post what maven version you are using ?
On 9/20/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can you post more information about which module is failing? Do you try to
build from an empty maven repo?
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise bug
reports and assign them to releases. Based on Ant's branch freeze suggestion
how about we now
1/ create the following
[snip]
ant elder wrote:
Just a reminder there is still a change freeze on the 1.0 branch.
Its still possible we may need to respin for some reason, but how about also
planning on doing some 1.0.x releases after 1.0 is out? If we keep changes
in the branch to an absolute minimum it should be
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I uploaded an updatesite for the plugins. To try it do the following:
1. In Eclipse, select Help / Software Updates / Find and Install /
Search for new features to install.
2. Add a new Remote Site,
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
Initially I saw a similar problem with the updatesite but it was
fixed under r579012. I can export the feature without problems on
WTP 2.0.
Thanks,
Raymond
Two questions:
- I am getting this error when exporting the feature. Could you
Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Rauymond wrote:
It seems that there is a PDE maven plugin @
http://mojo.codehaus.org/pde-maven-plugin/. Would it help
automate the build for our eclipse plugins?
I will check it out.
Historically maven and eclipse builds have been like oil and water...
but
Hi,
I am not speaking here as policy spec expert but just as somebody who is
familiar with how its implemented for Tuscany ;-).
It does seem that Sebastien has a point here about getting to specify these
things using policies.
As far as our policy fwk implementation goes with our release 1.0,
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
It feels like we have been getting better at using JIRA in the run up to
0.99 and 1.0 release in terms of the consistency with which we raise bug
reports and assign them to releases. Based on Ant's
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/21/07, Simon Nash (JIRA) tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org wrote:
i like the diagram on the Wiki version of the Web site a lot better.
I have been browsing the Wiki. I couldn't find a diagram different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530075
]
gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1803:
My transaction management is at a very low level, it means any
Dear root,
Please create an id for Simon Nash on the Tuscany project under Incubation.
Preferred userid:nash
Full name:Simon Nash
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for:ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
Votes:
tuscany-private
Hi Jean,
The following is my configuration:
- are you running a J2SE program or are you running in a WAR [War]
- are you using tuscany-sca-all.jar? [No - I use a subset of the jars -
please find the listing below]
activation-1.1.jar annogen-0.1.0.jar avalon-framework-4.1.3.jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530130
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1806:
-
Hi Dinesh
Thanks for the patch. I've just applied it to my local repo.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530131
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1806:
-
Is this just cause by Axis2 now that we have a JMS transport receiver
Auto Gen keys not getting updated in generated pojos
Key: TUSCANY-1807
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1807
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java
Same for me. Feature and site exports work fine.
The build/build all on the site will sync up generetaed plugins and
feature version in the site.xml
The feature export will also sync up (using the convention to put 0.0.0
as a plugin version in the feature.xml) and update its plugins versions
with
Jean Seabastien wrote:
Here's the updated structure in SVN r579109:
tools/eclipse/plugins/core
tools/eclipse/plugins/runtime
tools/eclipse/features/feature
tools/eclipse/site/updatesite
This is nicer and will also allow people to create other
folders under
tools for other
All:
Some of the built binaries alreday have a manifest that is
semi-osgi'fied.
I suggest that it would be really nice if all the tuscany binaries could
be delivered with a complete OSGi manifest.
I can see only good stuffs from that as it makes OSGi friendly for Felix
or Eclipse or general OSGi
All:
Some of the built binaries alreday have a manifest that is
semi-osgi'fied.
I suggest that it would be really nice if all the tuscany binaries could
be delivered with a complete OSGi manifest.
I can see only good stuffs from that as it makes OSGi friendly for Felix
or Eclipse or general OSGi
I am a big fan of IRC.
There is a channel #tuscany on freenode.
Why not have more folks join the fun there?
I would suggest that there is a public log of the channel that is setup,
to keep the chats in the open.
I could ask a buddy there : http://echelog.matzon.dk/logs/ to setup a
log bot for it.
Sounds like a good idea. Just yesterday I looked in Tuscany's homepage to
see if they use an IRC channel, but did not find any. It will be very
useful in getting help on issues real quick.
Vamsi
On 9/25/07, Philippe Ombredanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am a big fan of IRC.
There is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530205
]
dinesh shahane commented on TUSCANY-1806:
-
Simon,
I didn't see this error in my idea build when I run the
I have updated the Getting Involved page [1] to have the IRC
information. It should be live in the next couple hours.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-involved.html
On 9/25/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. Just yesterday I looked in
I am getting the following error when building from the latest sources.
My m2 repository is clean and the sources are up to date. Do I need to
modify any build scripts?
I will appreciate any pointers to resolve this issue.
C:\tuscany\trunk\sca mvn
...
...
---
[INFO] Building Apache
Luciano Resende wrote:
I have updated the Getting Involved page [1] to have the IRC
information. It should be live in the next couple hours.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-involved.html
On 9/25/07, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. Just
Copyright statements are inconsistent
-
Key: TUSCANY-1808
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1808
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Task
Components: Java SCA Spring Implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1756.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Patch Applied. Thanks !!!
Using EmbeddedSCADomain to deploy two
Dinesh Shahane wrote:
I am getting the following error when building from the latest sources.
My m2 repository is clean and the sources are up to date. Do I need to
modify any build scripts?
I will appreciate any pointers to resolve this issue.
C:\tuscany\trunk\sca mvn
...
...
---
Hi,
I did some investigation by debugging into a Tuscany web app with Tomcat. My
focus was on the usage of DOM. Here are some findings:
1) Tuscany uses DOM to hold the property values from the StAX stream
2) Axis2 Java2WSDL uses DOM
3) Rampart ws-security uses DOM
4) WSDL4J uses DOM
We could
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-1808:
Assignee: Luciano Resende
Copyright statements are inconsistent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-1808.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Files updated
Copyright
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-1770:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
The atom feed generated by feed-aggregator cannot be displayed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-1770.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed under r577546 and merged into trunk under r578945
The atom feed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1770?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng closed TUSCANY-1770.
-
The atom feed generated by feed-aggregator cannot be displayed by IE7
+1 for public log too...
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote:
I have updated the Getting Involved page [1] to have the IRC
information. It should be live in the next couple hours.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/getting-involved.html
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Dinesh Shahane wrote:
I am getting the following error when building from the latest sources.
My m2 repository is clean and the sources are up to date. Do I need to
modify any build scripts?
I will appreciate any pointers to resolve this issue.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1806?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530291
]
dinesh shahane commented on TUSCANY-1806:
-
I think we could just remove the transport description
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Philippe Ombredanne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 10:16 AM
Subject: Tuscany and IRC #tuscany on freenode
I am a big fan of IRC.
There is a channel #tuscany on freenode.
Why not have
Build Error - SCA topology XML model fails to resolve tuscany-core-spi
--
Key: TUSCANY-1809
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1809
Project: Tuscany
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530305
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-1809:
--
Are you using maven 2.0.5 ?
Build Error - SCA topology XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530307
]
dinesh shahane commented on TUSCANY-1809:
-
I am using version 2.0.7.
Build Error - SCA topology XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12530308
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-1809:
---
Hi,
I believe you are building the trunk instead of 1.0 release.
Some static files are still stored in SVN [1], and I see a
image-sources there, so we could either use that one, or a new one. As
for syncup, yes, it's still happening.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/site/
On 9/25/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the
Cool I'll ask my buddy to add a public IRC log at echelog, and will edit the
wiki page as soon as it is done :-)
--
Philippe
Hi, every body
My team is constructing a chinese community focusing sca and tuscany.
Would you like to suggest me a pretty domain name for the web host?
-
Don't let your dream ride pass you by.Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos.
Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
All:
Some of the built binaries alreday have a manifest that is
semi-osgi'fied.
I suggest that it would be really nice if all the tuscany binaries could
be delivered with a complete OSGi manifest.
I can see only good stuffs from that as it makes OSGi friendly for Felix
Hi,
Thanks for all your suggestions. I am kind of new to this policy framework.
Is there some documentation or code snip someone could provide me so I can
get a starting point?
Thanks,
Chris
On 9/25/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am not speaking here as policy spec
Comments inline.
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I did some investigation by debugging into a Tuscany web app with
Tomcat. My focus was on the usage of DOM. Here are some findings:
1) Tuscany uses DOM to hold the property values from the StAX stream
I think this is too heavy. Could we try the
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
All:
Some of the built binaries alreday have a manifest that is
semi-osgi'fied.
I suggest that it would be really nice if all the tuscany binaries could
be delivered with a complete OSGi manifest.
I can see only good stuffs from that as
I'm looking at java/sca/modules and java/sca/itest and would like to
delete or move to contrib some old / dormant / broken / unused modules.
Delete
- modules/host-home, an empty module created by me, I'm happy to remove
it as I was initially planning to put some admin pages there, but the
This is already due...
+1
On 9/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at java/sca/modules and java/sca/itest and would like to
delete or move to contrib some old / dormant / broken / unused modules.
Delete
- modules/host-home, an empty module created by me, I'm
Hi, every one,
Suggestion expected.
I keep processing some try on local transaction support.
I want to find a place to hold a only instance of a TransactionManager in
Tuscany.
Tuscany uses ExtensionPointRegistries to hold those global instances, so it
seems TM instance should be held the same
Hi, every one,
Meta file:
META-INF/services/org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.StAXArtifactProcessor
was commented.
Thus any xml mark like intent will not get processed?
Could you please give me some clue?
Thanks.
-
Boardwalk for $500? In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar reassigned TUSCANY-1807:
Assignee: Amita Vadhavkar
Auto Gen keys not getting updated in generated pojos
What if we start be defining some scenarios and concrete test cases
before we start making changes on the runtime ? This would probably
make things much easier and would help on the integration with
existing parts of the runtime. Thoughts ? Let me also think little
more overnight and send a more
+1 and thanks for doing this Philippe
- Venkat
On 9/26/07, Philippe Ombredanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool I'll ask my buddy to add a public IRC log at echelog, and will edit
the
wiki page as soon as it is done :-)
--
Philippe
Hi Chris,
There's not much that is specific to Tuscany with Policy Framework other
than what you could understand from the specs. Here is the link to the
specs...
http://osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_Policy_Framework_V100.pdf?version=1
The specs should give you a good idea of how to
Hi,
I am in the process of enabling the definitions and policy processors for
lazy initialization by specifying them in the META-INF/services. Right now
these processors need and instance of the ExtensibleStAXArtifactProcessor to
deal with various extensions such as policy attachments within
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1665?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar resolved TUSCANY-1665.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Resolved
Sample to demo DAS with external Transaction Manager
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar resolved TUSCANY-1543.
--
Resolution: Fixed
was jira with test cases only, no code fix
Demonstrate faulty
60 matches
Mail list logo
