Hi,
sorry I missed responding to this.
Haleh, I like the changes to the abstract.
Patrick, a joint session sounds really good.
However, having got this far I now find I have an issue with the
timing of ApacheCon, so is there someone else from Tuscany community
that might like to present
On 10/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sorry I missed responding to this.
Haleh, I like the changes to the abstract.
Patrick, a joint session sounds really good.
However, having got this far I now find I have an issue with the
timing of ApacheCon, so is there
On 10/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sorry I missed responding to this.
Haleh, I like the changes to the abstract.
Patrick, a joint session sounds really good.
However, having got this far I now find I
Simon,
Thank you for your note. Yes, you are right, we should have a separate
classloader for the SPI with its own visibility rules.
In terms of static dependencies (these are shown in Raymond's graph),
Tuscany modules are fairly neatly separated out. These are the compile-time
dependencies in
Simon,
you are right, I haven't submitted the abstract, so please do,
and thanks for stepping in.
Kelvin.
On 18/10/2007, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sorry I
Sebastien,
I have been trying to recreate the problem with the latest build, but I
couldn't. I will take a look through the code and see if I can figure out
what went wrong.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 10/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that this is the
Geng,
These Chinese pages look like a great way to increase Tuscany interest
and accessibility for the Chinese developer community.
Can they be hosted on the Tuscany Web site instead of on a separate
site? I am thinking of a toggle on the Tuscany site that allows the
viewer to select either an
Rajini Sivaram wrote:
Simon,
Thank you for your note. Yes, you are right, we should have a separate
classloader for the SPI with its own visibility rules.
In terms of static dependencies (these are shown in Raymond's graph),
Tuscany modules are fairly neatly separated out. These are the
On 10/18/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon,
Thank you for your note. Yes, you are right, we should have a separate
classloader for the SPI with its own visibility rules.
In terms of static dependencies (these are shown in Raymond's graph),
Tuscany modules are fairly neatly
On 10/18/07, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sebastien,
I have been trying to recreate the problem with the latest build, but I
couldn't. I will take a look through the code and see if I can figure out
what went wrong.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 10/17/07,
JS, Raymond,
I have attached a picture depicting the components the Shopping Store
Composite will have. I hope this represents the same picture you had in
mind. Otherwise, please let me know.
As you can see there, some questions arose:
1 - The composite will offer its service via WS or
Simon,
The error you are seeing is because Felix didn't shutdown properly after a
previous test, so the next test fails to start a new Felix runtime. I am not
sure why it didn't shutdown, because Felix is shutdown explicitly in
test.tearDown for every test (and Tuscany should have shutdown Felix
Simon,
At the moment my SPI bundle contains tuscany-core-spi, tuscany-contribution,
tuscany-policy, tuscany-interface and tuscany-assembly. From Simon Nash's
note, I assumed that SPI meant tuscany-core-spi and used that project + its
dependencies. I am ignoring host-embedded classes at the
Folks,
Comments inline
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Rajini
Re. 4 on Simon's list. Maybe it is useful to more clearly distinguish
between those Tuscany modules that are expect to be loaded statically,
assembly, core, etc and those that expected to be loaded dynamically,
binding.?, implementation.?
On 10/18/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
Comments inline
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi Rajini
Re. 4 on Simon's list. Maybe it is useful to more clearly distinguish
between those Tuscany modules that are expect to be loaded statically,
assembly, core, etc and those that
Add Create Conversation ID Factory Extension Point so code for creating
Conversation IDs is not duplicated throughout code base
---
Key: TUSCANY-1856
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1856?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Combellack updated TUSCANY-1856:
-
Attachment: ConversationIDExtensionPoint.patch
The attached patch contains:
Create an itest to test conversations over web services
---
Key: TUSCANY-1857
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1857
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-1857:
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Affects Version/s: Java-SCA-1.0
Create an itest to test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535929
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1857:
-
I've duplicated the conversation itest as a new itest
I've fixed JIRA 1804 and as soon as i've the net again at home, i'm
going to provide you the patch. I followed the Axis Async Test and
added to HTTP_CACHED_CLIENT, a MultiThreadedConnectionManager and to
SCANodeImpl a control to shutdown the management interface.
I've done even if i've not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535931
]
Jiang Chen commented on TUSCANY-1833:
-
Thanks. That was the problem.
I assumed arrays are wrapped in a parent
Hi
Similar code for handling conversational state as appears in the
JDKInvocationHandler has been added to the RuntimeWireInvoker and I was just
putting a change in and spotted something that looks a little strange. I'm
expecting the RuntimeWireInvoker to be used by many different conversations
On 10/18/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've fixed JIRA 1804 and as soon as i've the net again at home, i'm
going to provide you the patch. I followed the Axis Async Test and
added to HTTP_CACHED_CLIENT, a MultiThreadedConnectionManager and to
SCANodeImpl a control to shutdown the
Hope you've all see whats going on with our vote over on Incubator general:
http://marc.info/?t=11919162302r=1w=2
Looks like we've found some words most people are happy with:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for
Sample calculator-distributed README document outlines file structure that does
not reflect what actually exists
Key: TUSCANY-1858
URL:
26 matches
Mail list logo
