[jira] Closed: (TUSCANY-1833) XML2JavaBeanTransformer has problem transforming to beans with array fields

2007-12-27 Thread Venkatakrishnan (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan closed TUSCANY-1833. Resolution: Invalid Seems like the user's perspective of array representation was

Authentication Authorization across wsBinding java Implementation - was : Using security policies in the Bigbank scenario

2007-12-27 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi, Going further with the Bigbank scenario I have now split up the three different accounts - Savings, Stock and Checkings into individual composites. The checkingAccount service is exposed as a webservice and is enabled for authentication. Now I am trying to incorporate authorization into the

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process

2007-12-27 Thread Luciano Resende (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luciano Resende reassigned TUSCANY-1542: Assignee: Luciano Resende BPEL extension to link sca component into a business

Adding IE support for Feed Binding (binding-atom.js) , was: Fwd: svn commit: r607107 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca: demos/customer-map/src/main/resources/html/ modules/binding-feed/src/main/resourc

2007-12-27 Thread Luciano Resende
I found some issues using our Store scenario in Internet Explorer and after some investigation, realized that the issue was related to a IE behavior that was not populating responseXML for non xml contentTypes. I have updated the Feed javascript client to overcome this IE limitation and it is now

Re: Release 1.1 - what will be ready for next week?

2007-12-27 Thread haleh mahbod
Hi Simon, Thank you for trying to get a release candidate ready during the holidays. Why is implementation.bpel excluded? Haleh On 12/21/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 19, 2007 10:18 AM, Rajini Sivaram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon, No, I don't have an ID yet. Please