Re: Anyone seeing a test failure in itest/databindings/sdogen and how can I force the Continuum server to do a build of Tuscany?

Mark Combellack wrote: [snip] * Are other people seeing this problem with the itest/databindings/sdogen iTest? SVN revision r619725 just built OK for me. * How can I force the Continuum server to do a build? You need to create a continuum account [1]. Then once we add your acco

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=47819&projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Error Started at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 18:37:37 -0800 Finished at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 19:35:15 -0800 Total time: 57m 37s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=47819&projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Error Started at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 18:37:37 -0800 Finished at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 19:35:15 -0800 Total time: 57m 37s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Nu

Re: Consistent URI for binding.ws in J2SE and Web environment

Luciano Resende wrote: On Feb 6, 2008 3:28 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, When we run a Tuscany application with binding.ws in the J2SE (w/ embedded Jetty or Tomcat), the base URI of the service binding is http://locahost:/. If we package the same artifacts into a WAR and deplo

Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework

Raymond Feng wrote: One more question: Do you think if the participants to enforce PBV know their data capability upfront (static) or do they have to defer the decision to the actual invocation time (dynamic)? It seems that you were leaning to the dynamic style in your proposal. Static, per

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=47799&projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 16:03:40 -0800 Finished at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 17:02:35 -0800 Total time: 58m 54s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numbe

[continuum] BUILD ERROR: Apache Tuscany SCA Implementation Project

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=47799&projectId=277 Build statistics: State: Error Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 16:03:40 -0800 Finished at: Thu 7 Feb 2008 17:02:35 -0800 Total time: 58m 54s Build Trigger: Schedule Build Numbe

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2031) Error encountered when trying to use dynamic Data APIs and SDO code-generated APIs at the same time

Error encountered when trying to use dynamic Data APIs and SDO code-generated APIs at the same time --- Key: TUSCANY-2031 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TU

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2030) Java 2 security

Java 2 security --- Key: TUSCANY-2030 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2030 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0.1 Reporter: Greg Dritschler In environments w

Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework

Thank you for the smart idea :-). One more question: Do you think if the participants to enforce PBV know their data capability upfront (static) or do they have to defer the decision to the actual invocation time (dynamic)? It seems that you were leaning to the dynamic style in your proposal.

Re: Graduation next steps

ant elder wrote: On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to decide - should the replies go to both or just dev? In such a case I thin

Re: Graduation next steps

sebb wrote: Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote: Or can we configure JIRA to only send a message when a comment is added to an issue? Surely one needs all the JIRA changes? You're right, I was initially thinking that we could cut on the number of useless JIRA notifications, but after reviewing a

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-761) Support the ability to unregister all the SDO Types in a namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566684#action_12566684 ] Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-761: Yes, this is still a requirement. Again, my conce

Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework

Raymond Feng wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 9:56 AM Subject: Re: Bypassing unnecessary transforms by Tuscany databinding framework Raymond Feng wrote: I was initially thinking about the interce

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-2029) Multiple levels of Nested Composite References do not work as they are using the wrong URI in the binding

Multiple levels of Nested Composite References do not work as they are using the wrong URI in the binding - Key: TUSCANY-2029 URL: https://issues.apache.org/ji

Anyone seeing a test failure in itest/databindings/sdogen and how can I force the Continuum server to do a build of Tuscany?

Hi, I've just checked out the latest revision of Tuscany source code. When I run the iTests, one of the tests in itest/databindings/sdogen hangs. The test is trying to access the following URL: http://<>:8085/services/GreeterServiceWebServiceBinding Where <> is the full DNS name of my h

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1999) ConversationAttributes and expiry doesn't work with Stateless Conversational components

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566553#action_12566553 ] Thomas Greenwood commented on TUSCANY-1999: --- No probs about the user error - it

Re: Conversation from a non-SCA application

Hi Simon, You have mentioned in your last mail that there is only workaround for it is to use callaback injection... but i have already tried what you have mentioned... and i have mentioned the exception "Both the TO and MessageContext.TRANSPORT_OUT property are null, so nowhere to send" in my fir

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1835) XSDHelper.getAppinfo() returns wrong result

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566505#action_12566505 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1835: -- Please give more details,what constr

Re: Graduation next steps

On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a > > JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to > > decide - should the replies go to both or just dev? > > > In such a case I think the r

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-2014) XMLDocument object's rootElement member not intialized properly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566500#action_12566500 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-2014: -- Please comment on importance of this

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1918) Support for dynamic containment

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566498#action_12566498 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1918: -- This issue has a dependency on spec.

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1327) Generate static SDO APIs from wsdl files with type definition from and

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566497#action_12566497 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-1327: -- Fuhwei, please confirm if this issue

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-761) Support the ability to unregister all the SDO Types in a namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566490#action_12566490 ] Amita Vadhavkar commented on TUSCANY-761: - There is some discussion on Feb4,5,6 20