Hi Luciano,
Here is what I am facing...
- The targetnamespace attribute is a part of the sca:definitions element and
that is read by the SCADefnProcessor.
- For subsequent elements such as Intents and Policysets in the
definitions.xml, the SCADefnsProcessor delegates to the extension processor
w
Hi Sebastien,
If the SCADefinitions model must hold jms binding definitions, I guess it
must add the jms binding as a dependency. On the other hand the jms binding
already brings in the 'definitions' module as a downsteam dependency.
I guess that some cleaning up of the Contribution might ease a
Hi,
I have an issue with the component service not coming up. below mentioned
is my scenario.
I have a JSP (default.jsp) which does the following:
<%@ page import="org.apache.tuscany.sca.host.embedded.SCADomain"%>
<%@ page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8" language="java" %>
<%
SCADom
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:46 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Ok
Maybe you could describe a little more what is the issue you are
having, and we could try helping finding another solution for your
issue, particularly related to targetNamespace, as it might be
available trough the parser API. Also, I usually try to avoid context
objects, as they usually grow out
There is positive feedback on Tuscany from J. Aaron who conducted Asia OS
Tuscany Code fest session [1].
Some comments are:
"One interesting observation was that the Tuscany team (students) got
started faster thanks to good project documentation and fewer software
prerequisites. "
"However, they
It would be great if people could start changing the subject when
replying with comments to a given committs, this would allow others to
better identify what's going on and possible jump and help on the
discussion.
Just my 2c
Thanks
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apac
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi Ant,
I suppose this is going to simply use the StAX processor that we currently
have for jms binding. That being the case I see there is going to be
circular dependency issues
I may be able to help with the circular dependencies issues, could you
help me understand
Simon Laws wrote:
Hi
There is now a test in the binding name creation code that checks that two
service bing types are the same before testing for duplicate names. I don't
think the binding type is relevant here. We should actually be testing that
the scheme that the bindings intend to use are
FYI, here is a post [1] from J. Aaron about what happened on the AOSS Code Fest.
[1] http://cubiclemuses.com/cm/blog/2008/codefest.html
2008/3/5 Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please review the page with the suggestions discussed on this thread.
> I plan to send this tomorrow for the eve
I have updated the client application to start components from
composite after all contributions have been contributed (revision
#635652), but now I'm getting other issues, that might be unrelated.
Please let me know if this helps, and if the issue I'm seeing is
related or not.
*** Calling BIG-BAN
Hi,
If I have the (component, service/reference, binding, operation) model
instances handy, how can I get a list of effective policySets for the
operation? Are we consolidating the declarations at different levels to the
binding?
We can use the following example (I intentionally omit the @re
Hi Luciano,
I have split up the bigbank demo into two. 1) bigbank and 2)
bigbank-account.
The bigbank is the facade to the users and the bigbank-account is the
account management module used by the bigbank. I have also pulling in
policies and security - whatever that has been working with the
s
I was going to take a quick look at this, but before I do, let me ask
if svn revision #635604 is related to the issue you are asking here.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently faced a situation where I wished to passed some context from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577038#action_12577038
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-2056:
-
Hi Daniel
I just tried this against the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-2056:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
> Conversation does not continue if a Service Reference is passed as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12577029#action_12577029
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-1162:
-
Is this covered by what Sebastien has been doi
@ConversationId injection in @Scope(Composite) services
---
Key: TUSCANY-2071
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2071
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1511.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SCA-Next)
Java-SCA-1.2
Cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-2070:
Description:
The @ConversationAttributes(singlePrincipal=false) attribute is not yet
implemented
@ConversationAttributes(singlePrincipal=false) is not yet implemented
-
Key: TUSCANY-2070
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2070
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1779.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
There is now a new mechanism (workspace) for locating and parsing
contribut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1957.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
The store tutorial now uses a different mechanism for parsing contributions a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1958.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
The store tutorial now uses a different mechanism for parsing contributions a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-1952.
---
Resolution: Won't Fix
The store tutorial now uses a different mechanism for parsing contributions a
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=63406&projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Mon 10 Mar 2008 05:20:38 -0700
Finished at: Mon 10 Mar 2008 06:45:59 -0700
Total time: 1h 25m 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=63406&projectId=277
Build statistics:
State: Error
Previous State: Building
Started at: Mon 10 Mar 2008 05:20:38 -0700
Finished at: Mon 10 Mar 2008 06:45:59 -0700
Total time: 1h 25m 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576963#action_12576963
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1974:
Another very useful tool for debugging this is T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576948#action_12576948
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-1974:
As a quick test i tried debugging through the cu
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: jsdelfino
> Date: Sun Mar 9 22:43:19 2008
> New Revision: 635435
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=635435&view=rev
> Log:
> Fixed algorithm in CompositeConfigurationBuilder to produce correct URIs,
> in particular avoid
Continuum VMBuild Server wrote:
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=63376&projectId=277
SVN revision r635507 contains a fix for this failure.
--
Jean-Sebastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Hi,
I recently faced a situation where I wished to passed some context from one
StAXArtifact Processor to others down the chain. More specifically, to get
the 'targetNamespace' of the definitions.xml file apply to PoliyIntent and
PolicySet names, I wished to pass the 'targetNamespace' value from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-2067:
---
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.2
> URL Handling in Tuscany breaks when Tuscany is run under OSGi
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-2068:
---
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-1.2
> itest/osgi-implementation is broken due to recent changes
> -
34 matches
Mail list logo
