Simon Laws wrote:
I uncommented the lines in this code
protected Port createPort(Definition definition, Binding binding,
Service service) throws WSDLException {
Port port = definition.createPort();
port.setBinding(binding);
configurePort(definition, port, binding);
I think we should keep the following piece. As the comment
said,create a remote service ref , so it can delegate to the binding
implementation to handle remote case.
// Lookup the component in the domain
Component component = componentManager.getComponent(componentName);
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588395#action_12588395
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2220:
-
I have been investigating how this used to
I believe we now understand the impact of this problem and we
have a fix/workaround that could be applied to the codebase
(see [1] for details). We need to decide whether it's worth
holding the 1.2 release for a respin to include this fix.
On the pro side for holding the release:
Problems
+1 for a respin - I think this one's a big enough of a problem to justify it.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we now understand the impact of this problem and we
have a fix/workaround that could be applied to the codebase
(see [1] for details).
Hi All,
-1 from me - there's one outstanding JIRA issue [1] which I don't feel
is acceptable to be included on a release, a respin to resolve this
issue would bring the release up to the normal high standards :)
Dave.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently facing issues when attmepting to utilise the wsdl
generated by a service exposed using
One comment inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for the response.
Indeed this is a change in Tuscany behaviour - using the same service
running under 1.0-incubating or 1.1-incubating the WSDL generated
Can't this be handled via a patch on top of 1.2?
On 4/13/08, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for a respin - I think this one's a big enough of a problem to justify
it.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe we now understand the impact of
Where we are with a proper fix for TUSCANY-2220 ?
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:57 AM, haleh mahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't this be handled via a patch on top of 1.2?
On 4/13/08, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for a respin - I think this one's a big enough of a problem
Hi Simon
Are we close to a fix to this issue ?
- Luciano
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:19 AM, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One comment inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Dave Sowerby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hey Simon,
Thanks for
Comments inline
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:42 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/04/2008, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
I think I have the final fix by passing the uri into the port generation and
I'm running the full build now.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:05 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
I checked in a fix into trunk for TUSCANY-2220 under r647623. I'll let you
to decide if you want to merge it into 1.2 branch.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2008 12:05 PM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588426#action_12588426
]
Raymond Feng commented on TUSCANY-2220:
---
I checked in a fix into trunk for
Tutorial Marketplace scenario ready
---
Key: TUSCANY-2224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Java SCA Tutorial
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2224:
-
Attachment: StoreMarketNode.zip
Tutorial Marketplace scenario ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2224:
-
Attachment: LaunchStoreMarketNode.zip
Tutorial Marketplace scenario ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2224:
-
Attachment: market.zip
Tutorial Marketplace scenario ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2224:
-
Attachment: store-market.zip
Tutorial Marketplace scenario ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2224:
-
Description:
Hello,
I have finished coding the tutorial marketplace scenario.
I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mario Antollini updated TUSCANY-2223:
-
Component/s: (was: C++ SCA)
Java SCA Tutorial
Recursive Target
Hello,
I have finished coding the tutorial marketplace scenario.
I have attached all the necessary files in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224
Please, follow these steps in order to add it as another module of the
tutorial:
market.zip - contains the logic to obtain
Thanks Raymond.
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I checked in a fix into trunk for TUSCANY-2220 under r647623. I'll let you
to decide if you want to merge it into 1.2 branch.
Thanks,
Raymond
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Luciano Resende resolved TUSCANY-2224.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-Next
Assignee: Luciano
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi,
I checked in a fix into trunk for TUSCANY-2220 under r647623. I'll let
you to decide if you want to merge it into 1.2 branch.
Thanks, Raymond. I tried this on my test case and it worked OK.
Simon
Thanks,
Raymond
Luciano Resende wrote:
Please review and vote on the 1.2 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~lresende/tuscany/sca-1.2-RC3b/
This includes the signed binary and source distributions, the RAT report,
and the Maven
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588481#action_12588481
]
Simon Nash commented on TUSCANY-2220:
-
Thanks, Raymond.
I tried this fix on my test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12588483#action_12588483
]
Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-2220:
--
I'm going to merge this fix to SCA
30 matches
Mail list logo
