[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ilya Kanonirov resolved TUSCANY-2320.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> The contextPath init parameter for TuscanyServletFilter.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12598180#action_12598180
]
Ilya Kanonirov commented on TUSCANY-2320:
-
Never used distributed domain nodes. :
The contextPath init parameter for NodeServletFilter
Key: TUSCANY-2327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2327
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java S
Sounds good to me.
...ant
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I now have the Calculator sample running using all the great work
> Rajini did to use Equinox, 1 bundle per third-party library, and
> absolute jar paths. It results in 119 bundles
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I completely agree with you that having a ClassLoader delegate to a
ModelResolver delegating to a ClassLoader etc will cause confusion.
So, how about having ContributionClassLoader implement the ModelResolver
interface?
Yes, that sounds like a good idea - if it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng resolved TUSCANY-2290.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied under r658007. Thanks Dan for the patch.
> Java 2 Security
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Raymond Feng reassigned TUSCANY-2290:
-
Assignee: Raymond Feng
> Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part 1)
> -
Jeff Anderson wrote:
To everybody out there interested in seeing SCA being more widely adopted.
Recently I posted a general overview of SCA coverage at JavaWorld last
week in San Francisco. Which can be found at
http://agileconsulting.blogspot.com/2008/05/highlights-of-sca-at-javaworld-2008.html
I have tried to build the source distribution with a clean maven repo,
and I was getting errors:
[INFO]
[ERROR] FATAL ERROR
[INFO]
[INFO] Failed to reso
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I now have the Calculator sample running using all the great work
> Rajini did to use Equinox, 1 bundle per third-party library, and
> absolute jar paths. It results in 119 bundles, uses 19MB and takes
> about 5
Hi,
I now have the Calculator sample running using all the great work
Rajini did to use Equinox, 1 bundle per third-party library, and
absolute jar paths. It results in 119 bundles, uses 19MB and takes
about 50 seconds to run. If folks are ok with this, I will create a
Jira and submit it as a pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2290.2.patch)
> Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: (was: TUSCANY-2290.1.patch)
> Java 2 Security enablement for Tuscany sample (part
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: TUSCANY-2290.3.patch
Trying once more. This time using TortoiseSVN to generate patch
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I am interested in getting rid of the need to have a physical deploy.xml
> file in the directory with a BPEL process file.
>
> Can I supply the same information to the ODE runtime through some other
> means, suc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws resolved TUSCANY-2277.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Checked in at r657881. Thanks Ram
> Standardization of registering msg with
I've just checked in Ram's patch to convert validation messages (i.e. those
messages indicating that the user have provided invalid input of some form)
to resource bundles and pass them through the Monitor. We need to take
account of this change as we change or add code to do with validation.
Prima
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone seeing the same problem? svn.apache.org seems very slow today and
> times out most of the times.
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
Yep. SVN has been up and down regularly today. I've only manage to do one
checkin
Raymond Feng wrote:
>I have some trouble applying the patch. It complains an unknown line
>type is found line 573 (I don't know what it means:-(.
Hi Raymond. I regenerated the patch as TUSCANY-2290.2.patch and attached
it to the TUSCANY-2290 JIRA. I think with the previous patch I deleted
some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dan Becker updated TUSCANY-2290:
Attachment: TUSCANY-2290.2.patch
I saw on the Tuscany dev list that there was a problem with the
Anyone seeing the same problem? svn.apache.org seems very slow today and
times out most of the times.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Folks,
I am interested in getting rid of the need to have a physical deploy.xml file in the directory with
a BPEL process file.
Can I supply the same information to the ODE runtime through some other means, such as method
parameters or some in-memory mechanism?
For the SCA integration, the
ant elder wrote:
i'm happy to wait till ... I've got things more working
...ant
Ant,
Yes - I'm happy for you to beaver away getting it ready, but keep off general release until it does
work OK ;-)
Yours, Mike.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seeing the same problem. (... and it doesn't seem very
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Mike Edwards <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
>>> data transformation. It seem
ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
there. If possible, I would like to leverage the l
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting to look into the performance improvements in the JAXB/AXIOM
> data transformation. It seems that the Axis2 1.4 has done a lot of good work
> there. If possible, I would like to leverage the latest AXIOM
I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment.
Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven 2.0.7 I
got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when trying to build
from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, perhaps if w
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:03 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:22 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing the same problem. (... and it doesn't seem very intermittent)
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Rajini Sivaram <
More comments in line...
Simon
> Created a separate factory for it (separate as I though the model may need
>> to be pluggable as some point)
>>
>
> Would it be possible to just add the create method the AssemblyFactory?
Yep, we could do that. Am going to hold back for a little while on thi
There's an RC3 of rampart out today, so hopefully it shouldn't be too much
longer for the official release. If we can get everything working we could
temporarily add the maven repo for that RC3 to our pom.xml's so we can start
the 1.4 upgrade now...but, right now I'm having some trouble getting it
Hi Rajini,
2008/5/18 Rajini Sivaram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Graham,
>
> Is there any reason you didn't switch over to one-bundle-per-3rdparty jar?
>
I couldn't get the itest/osgi-tuscany tests to pass and ran out of
time :-( . I've tried with the latest and most are now passing, but I
still have
32 matches
Mail list logo
