Re: [BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework

2008-05-14 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, To improve the Tuscany databinding framework for simplicity and flexibility, I come out a list of potential TODOs. Your feedback/ideas/help will be very welcome. That's a nice list, I marked the items I feel really important with +1 and some comments. * Refine/si

Re: [BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework

2008-05-14 Thread Dan Becker
Raymond Feng wrote: >To improve the Tuscany databinding framework for simplicity and >flexibility, I come out a list of potential TODOs. Your >feedback/ideas/help will be very welcome. Being a developer, I may be biased towards items that make the developer's life a bit easier, so I tend to f

Re: [BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework

2008-05-14 Thread Scott Kurz
Raymond, All of these sound interesting. A minor point: In "making the databinding framework easy to use as a utility" it would help to refactor out the exception/fault matching code so it's not tied to an interceptor, as other users of the Mediator may need to do the same routine. An

[BRAINSTORM] Future improvements for Tuscany databinding framework

2008-05-12 Thread Raymond Feng
Hi, To improve the Tuscany databinding framework for simplicity and flexibility, I come out a list of potential TODOs. Your feedback/ideas/help will be very welcome. * Refine/simplify the databinding SPIs (for better extensibility and consumeablity) * Make the databinding framework easy to u